Winston W Tan1, Jacob B Allred2, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia3, Donald W Northfelt4, James N Ingle5, Matthew P Goetz5, Edith A Perez3. 1. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. Electronic address: tan.winston@mayo.edu. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. 3. Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ. 5. Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Histone deacetylase inhibitors have been found to restore sensitivity to the estrogen receptor in endocrine-resistant and triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. We decided to test panobinostat, a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, because of preclinical data, combined with letrozole in a phase I study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with metastatic breast cancer to determine the safety and tumor response using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. Dose level 1 was panobinostat 20 mg orally 3 times weekly with oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily. Dose level 2 was panobinostat 30 mg orally 3 times weekly, with the same dose of letrozole. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (6 at each dose level) were enrolled, and 43 cycles of treatment were given. Of the 6 patients at dose level 1, 1 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (20-mg dose level; an increase in creatinine). At the 30-mg dose level, 3 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity, 1 each of grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 diarrhea. The maximum tolerated dose was 20 mg. Of the 12 patients, 2 experienced a partial response, and 5 had stable disease. The most common severe adverse event was thrombocytopenia, occurring in 4 of 12 patients. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II starting dose is panobinostat 20 mg orally 3 times weekly (eg, Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily. This dose should be escalated to 30 mg orally 3 times weekly if no grade 3 toxicity has developed, because the partial responses occurred in patients receiving the 30-mg dose.
INTRODUCTION: Histone deacetylase inhibitors have been found to restore sensitivity to the estrogen receptor in endocrine-resistant and triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. We decided to test panobinostat, a pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor, because of preclinical data, combined with letrozole in a phase I study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with metastatic breast cancer to determine the safety and tumor response using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors. Dose level 1 was panobinostat 20 mg orally 3 times weekly with oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily. Dose level 2 was panobinostat 30 mg orally 3 times weekly, with the same dose of letrozole. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients (6 at each dose level) were enrolled, and 43 cycles of treatment were given. Of the 6 patients at dose level 1, 1 experienced dose-limiting toxicity (20-mg dose level; an increase in creatinine). At the 30-mg dose level, 3 of 6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity, 1 each of grade 3 thrombocytopenia with bleeding, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, and grade 3 diarrhea. The maximum tolerated dose was 20 mg. Of the 12 patients, 2 experienced a partial response, and 5 had stable disease. The most common severe adverse event was thrombocytopenia, occurring in 4 of 12 patients. CONCLUSION: The recommended phase II starting dose is panobinostat 20 mg orally 3 times weekly (eg, Monday, Wednesday, Friday) and oral letrozole 2.5 mg daily. This dose should be escalated to 30 mg orally 3 times weekly if no grade 3 toxicity has developed, because the partial responses occurred in patients receiving the 30-mg dose.
Authors: Denise A Yardley; Roohi R Ismail-Khan; Bohuslav Melichar; Mikhail Lichinitser; Pamela N Munster; Pamela M Klein; Scott Cruickshank; Kathy D Miller; Min J Lee; Jane B Trepel Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: X Yang; A T Ferguson; S J Nass; D L Phillips; K A Butash; S M Wang; J G Herman; N E Davidson Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2000-12-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Thehang H Luu; Robert J Morgan; Lucille Leong; Dean Lim; Mark McNamara; Jana Portnow; Paul Frankel; David D Smith; James H Doroshow; Carol Wong; Ana Aparicio; David R Gandara; George Somlo Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Judith Clancy Keen; Lan Yan; Kelly M Mack; Catherine Pettit; Dawn Smith; Dipali Sharma; Nancy E Davidson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Chandra R Tate; Lyndsay V Rhodes; H Chris Segar; Jennifer L Driver; F Nell Pounder; Matthew E Burow; Bridgette M Collins-Burow Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2012-05-21 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: P N Munster; K T Thurn; S Thomas; P Raha; M Lacevic; A Miller; M Melisko; R Ismail-Khan; H Rugo; M Moasser; S E Minton Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Zuzana Tatarova; Dylan C Blumberg; James E Korkola; Laura M Heiser; John L Muschler; Pepper J Schedin; Sebastian W Ahn; Gordon B Mills; Lisa M Coussens; Oliver Jonas; Joe W Gray Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 68.164
Authors: Pulak R Manna; Ahsen U Ahmed; Deborah Molehin; Madhusudhanan Narasimhan; Kevin Pruitt; P Hemachandra Reddy Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-06-03
Authors: Maryam Nakhjavani; Jennifer E Hardingham; Helen M Palethorpe; Tim J Price; Amanda R Townsend Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2019-09-02 Impact factor: 3.588