C Beard1, K J Hsu2, L S Rifkin2, A B Busch2, T Björgvinsson2. 1. McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, United States. Electronic address: cbeard@mclean.harvard.edu. 2. McLean Hospital/Harvard Medical School, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The PHQ-9 was originally developed as a screener for depression in primary care and is commonly used in medical settings. However, surprisingly little is known about its psychometric properties and utility as a severity measure in psychiatric populations. We examined the full range of psychometric properties of the PHQ-9 in patients with a range of psychiatric disorders (i.e., mood, anxiety, personality, psychotic). METHODS: Patients (n=1023) completed the PHQ-9 upon admission and discharge from a partial hospital, as well as other self-report measures of depression, anxiety, well-being, and a structured diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Internal consistency was good (α=.87). The PHQ-9 demonstrated a strong correlation with a well-established measure of depression, moderate correlations with related constructs, a weak correlation with a theoretically unrelated construct (i.e., disgust sensitivity), and good sensitivity to change, with a large pre- to post-treatment effect size. Using a cut-off of ≥13, the PHQ-9 demonstrated good sensitivity (.83) and specificity (.72). A split-half exploratory factor analysis/confirmatory factor analysis suggested a two-factor solution with one factor capturing cognitive and affective symptoms and a second factor reflecting somatic symptoms. Psychometric properties did not differ between male and female participants. LIMITATIONS: No clinician-rated measure of improvement, and the sample lacked ethnoracial diversity. CONCLUSIONS: This first comprehensive validation of the PHQ-9 in a large, psychiatric sample supported its use as a severity measure and as a measure of treatment outcome. It also performed well as a screener for a current depressive episode using a higher cut-off than previously recommended for primary care samples.
BACKGROUND: The PHQ-9 was originally developed as a screener for depression in primary care and is commonly used in medical settings. However, surprisingly little is known about its psychometric properties and utility as a severity measure in psychiatric populations. We examined the full range of psychometric properties of the PHQ-9 in patients with a range of psychiatric disorders (i.e., mood, anxiety, personality, psychotic). METHODS:Patients (n=1023) completed the PHQ-9 upon admission and discharge from a partial hospital, as well as other self-report measures of depression, anxiety, well-being, and a structured diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Internal consistency was good (α=.87). The PHQ-9 demonstrated a strong correlation with a well-established measure of depression, moderate correlations with related constructs, a weak correlation with a theoretically unrelated construct (i.e., disgust sensitivity), and good sensitivity to change, with a large pre- to post-treatment effect size. Using a cut-off of ≥13, the PHQ-9 demonstrated good sensitivity (.83) and specificity (.72). A split-half exploratory factor analysis/confirmatory factor analysis suggested a two-factor solution with one factor capturing cognitive and affective symptoms and a second factor reflecting somatic symptoms. Psychometric properties did not differ between male and female participants. LIMITATIONS: No clinician-rated measure of improvement, and the sample lacked ethnoracial diversity. CONCLUSIONS: This first comprehensive validation of the PHQ-9 in a large, psychiatric sample supported its use as a severity measure and as a measure of treatment outcome. It also performed well as a screener for a current depressive episode using a higher cut-off than previously recommended for primary care samples.
Authors: C Beard; A J Millner; M J C Forgeard; E I Fried; K J Hsu; M T Treadway; C V Leonard; S J Kertz; T Björgvinsson Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Christian A Webb; Zachary D Cohen; Courtney Beard; Marie Forgeard; Andrew D Peckham; Thröstur Björgvinsson Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2020-01
Authors: Daniel J Lee; Lewina O Lee; Michelle J Bovin; Samantha J Moshier; Sunny J Dutra; Sarah E Kleiman; Raymond C Rosen; Jennifer J Vasterling; Terence M Keane; Brian P Marx Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2020-06-01
Authors: Philip Held; Brian J Klassen; Charles F Small; Michael B Brennan; Rebecca Van Horn; Niranjan S Karnik; Mark H Pollack; Alyson K Zalta Journal: Cogn Behav Pract Date: 2019-08-09
Authors: R Kathryn McHugh; Andrew D Peckham; Thröstur Björgvinsson; Francesca M Korte; Courtney Beard Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: Kate H Bentley; Hitoshi Sakurai; Kelsey L Lowman; Lisa Rines-Toth; James McKowen; Paola Pedrelli; A Eden Evins; Amy M Yule Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2021-01-07 Impact factor: 4.839