Literature DB >> 26774264

Removal of the pesticides imazalil and tebuconazole in saturated constructed wetland mesocosms.

Tao Lv1, Yang Zhang2, Liang Zhang3, Pedro N Carvalho3, Carlos A Arias3, Hans Brix3.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the removal of the pesticides imazalil and tebuconazole at realistic concentration levels (10 and 100 μg L(-1)) in saturated constructed wetland (CW) mesocosms planted with five wetland plant species (Typha latifolia, Phragmites australis, Iris pseudacorus, Juncus effusus and Berula erecta) at different hydraulic loading rates during summer and winter. The removal of imazalil and tebuconazole was not influenced by the influent concentration, but the removal efficiency for both compounds was lower in winter than in summer. Planted mesocosms had significantly higher removal efficiencies than the unplanted controls only in summer. The first-order kinetics model fitted the tebuconazole removal in all mesocosms, and the reaction rate constants varied by plant species and season (0.1-0.7 d(-1) in winter and 0.6-2.9 d(-1) in summer). For imazalil, the first-order kinetics model fitted the removal only in mesocosms planted with Phragmites australis (k = 1.2 ± 0.4 d(-1)) and in the unplanted control (k = 1.2 ± 0.5 d(-1) in both summer and winter). The removal of imazalil and tebuconazole by sorption to the bed substrate and plant uptake were low, suggesting a high rate of metabolization in the saturated CW mesocosms. The removal of imazalil and tebuconazole correlated with the rate of evapotranspiration and the removal of nutrients (N and P) during summer and with the DO/oxygen saturation during winter. This reveals two possible metabolization pathways: degradation inside the plant tissue after uptake and plant-stimulated microbial degradation in the bed substrate. Furthermore, the results indicate that nitrifying bacteria may play an active role in the biodegradation of these pesticides.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocides; Emerging organic pollutants; Fungicides; Macrophytes; Phytoremediation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26774264     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  5 in total

1.  Effect of multilayer substrate configuration in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands: assessment of treatment performance, biofilm development, and solids accumulation.

Authors:  Yanli Ding; Tao Lyu; Shaoyuan Bai; Zhenling Li; Haijing Ding; Shaohong You; Qinglin Xie
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-11-04       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 2.  Phytoremediation potential and control of Phragmites australis as a green phytomass: an overview.

Authors:  Shahabaldin Rezania; Junboum Park; Parveen Fatemeh Rupani; Negisa Darajeh; Xin Xu; Rahim Shahrokhishahraki
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Superabsorbent polymer as a supplement substrate of constructed wetland to retain pesticides from agricultural runoff.

Authors:  Yuying Jing; Martin Krauss; Simon Zschieschang; Anja Miltner; Andrii Butkovskyi; Trine Eggen; Matthias Kästner; Karolina M Nowak
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2021-10-16       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Triazophos (TAP) removal in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands (HSCWs) and its accumulation in plants and substrates.

Authors:  Juan Wu; Zhu Li; Liang Wu; Fei Zhong; Naxin Cui; Yanran Dai; Shuiping Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Challenges and Current Status of the Biological Treatment of PFAS-Contaminated Soils.

Authors:  Esmaeil Shahsavari; Duncan Rouch; Leadin S Khudur; Duncan Thomas; Arturo Aburto-Medina; Andrew S Ball
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.