Literature DB >> 26774249

Assessing the evidentiary value of smokeless powder comparisons.

Dana-Marie K Dennis1, Mary R Williams1, Michael E Sigman2.   

Abstract

Gas chromatography-electron ionization-mass spectrometry (GC-EI-MS) and physical characteristics data for 726 smokeless reloading powders were analyzed by pairwise comparisons of samples comprising the same product and different products. Pairwise comparisons were restricted to samples having matching kernel shape, color, presence or absence of a perforation and measurements. Discrete results were analyzed for same and different products having matching chemical composition determined from a list of 13 organic components. A continuous score-based likelihood ratio was determined for same and different product comparisons using the Fisher transform of the Pearson correlation between the total ion spectra of the compared samples. Probability distributions for same product and different product comparisons appeared bimodal and were modeled with kernel density distributions. In the discrete and continuous data comparisons, the likelihood ratios for probabilities conditioned on same shape, color, presence/absence of perforation and size were found to provide relatively limited support for either the proposition of same product or different product. Further restricting the pairwise comparisons to samples belonging to the same cluster, as determined by agglomerative hierarchical cluster analysis, provided probability distributions for same product and different product comparisons that were more normal, but did not improve the resulting likelihood ratios. These results inform the forensic analyst regarding the evidentiary value of database search results and direct comparisons of recovered and control samples of smokeless powders.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Evidentiary value; Forensic science; Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; Likelihood ratio; Smokeless powder; Total ion spectrum

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26774249     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  3 in total

Review 1.  Interpol review of gunshot residue 2016-2019.

Authors:  Sébastien Charles; Nadia Geusens; Emeline Vergalito; Bart Nys
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 2.  Interpol review of detection and characterization of explosives and explosives residues 2016-2019.

Authors:  Douglas J Klapec; Greg Czarnopys; Julie Pannuto
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Vapor Signatures of Double-Base Smokeless Powders and Gunshot Residues for Supporting Canine Odor Imprinting.

Authors:  Ta-Hsuan Ong; James Ljunggren; Ted Mendum; Geoff Geurtsen; Roderick Russell Kunz
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.