Jason G Andrade1, Andrew D Krahn2, Allan C Skanes3, Daniel Purdham4, Antonio Ciaccia4, Sean Connors5. 1. Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Heart Rhythm Services, the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Electronic address: Jason.guy.andrade@umontreal.ca. 2. Heart Rhythm Services, the Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. 4. Bayer Healthcare, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Cardiology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC therapy, and of physicians who prescribe OAC therapy. METHODS: A national survey of randomly selected patients (n = 266) and physicians (n = 178) was conducted between May and September 2014. Each was asked to evaluate the importance of individual OAC attributes and identify which of 2 medication profiles they would prefer (individual attributes were progressively modified to determine which were the most valued and/or influenced treatment choice). Medication adherence and prescription practice was also assessed. RESULTS: The preferences of patients and physicians regarding OAC therapy differed but largely focused on characteristics related to safety and, to a lesser extent, efficacy. When based solely on the basis of the attribute profile (blinded to the specific agent), physicians were more likely to select apixaban (61%), whereas patients showed no significant preference among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Despite this, 49% of physicians spontaneously stated rivaroxaban as their preferred agent (vs 25% apixaban). Patients prescribed and taking once daily medications (rivaroxaban or warfarin) showed better compliance with their OAC therapy (approximately 30% of twice daily medications being taken once daily, with significantly more missed doses compared with once daily medications). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world prescriptions do not reflect reported values, which suggests that other factors influence patient-physician decision-making around OAC therapy. Data on self-reported adherence to OAC therapy and discordance in the use of OACs from prescribed regimens are concerning and warrant further investigation.
BACKGROUND: Real-world data on patients' and physicians' values related to the use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation are currently lacking. We sought to assess the values, preferences, and experience of patients who receive OAC therapy, and of physicians who prescribe OAC therapy. METHODS: A national survey of randomly selected patients (n = 266) and physicians (n = 178) was conducted between May and September 2014. Each was asked to evaluate the importance of individual OAC attributes and identify which of 2 medication profiles they would prefer (individual attributes were progressively modified to determine which were the most valued and/or influenced treatment choice). Medication adherence and prescription practice was also assessed. RESULTS: The preferences of patients and physicians regarding OAC therapy differed but largely focused on characteristics related to safety and, to a lesser extent, efficacy. When based solely on the basis of the attribute profile (blinded to the specific agent), physicians were more likely to select apixaban (61%), whereas patients showed no significant preference among apixaban, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Despite this, 49% of physicians spontaneously stated rivaroxaban as their preferred agent (vs 25% apixaban). Patients prescribed and taking once daily medications (rivaroxaban or warfarin) showed better compliance with their OAC therapy (approximately 30% of twice daily medications being taken once daily, with significantly more missed doses compared with once daily medications). CONCLUSIONS: Real-world prescriptions do not reflect reported values, which suggests that other factors influence patient-physician decision-making around OAC therapy. Data on self-reported adherence to OAC therapy and discordance in the use of OACs from prescribed regimens are concerning and warrant further investigation.
Authors: Daria Generalova; Scott Cunningham; Stephen J Leslie; Gordon F Rushworth; Laura McIver; Derek Stewart Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-09-22 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Gabriello Marchetti; Emanuele Bertaglia; Alberto Camerini; Giuseppe De Angelis; Lucia Filippucci; Antonio Maggi; Sebastiano Marra; Carlo Racani; Carlo Serrati Journal: J Atr Fibrillation Date: 2020-02-28
Authors: Zachary D Hale; Xiowen Kong; Brian Haymart; Xiaokui Gu; Eva Kline-Rogers; Steve Almany; Jay Kozlowski; Gregory D Krol; Scott Kaatz; James B Froehlich; Geoffrey D Barnes Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Daria Generalova; Scott Cunningham; Stephen J Leslie; Gordon Rushworth; Laura McIver; Derek Stewart Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2019-08-02 Impact factor: 4.335