Literature DB >> 26773853

Maternal Outcomes in Birth Centers: An Integrative Review of the Literature.

Jill Alliman, Julia C Phillippi.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The birth center, a relatively recent innovation in maternity care, is an increasingly popular location of birth. The purpose of this integrative literature review is to assess the research on maternal outcomes from birth center care.
METHODS: Using methods by Whittemore and Knafl, we conducted an integrative review of studies of birth centers published in English since 1980. Twenty-three quantitative sources and 9 qualitative sources describing maternal outcomes of birth center care were reviewed and synthesized.
RESULTS: Outcomes for women receiving birth care were positive. Spontaneous vaginal birth rates and perineal integrity were higher for women beginning care in a birth center compared to women in hospital care. Rates of cesarean birth were also lower for women planning birth center care. Transfer rates are difficult to compare across studies, but antepartum transfer rates ranged from 13% to 27.2%. Intrapartum transfer rates ranged from 11.6% to 37.4%, and from 11.6% to 16.5% in studies published from 2011 to 2013. Nulliparous women had higher rates of transfer than multiparous women. Few severe maternal outcomes and no maternal deaths were reported in any studies. Women were satisfied with the comprehensive, personalized care that they received from birth centers. DISCUSSION: Quantitative studies reviewed included more than 84,300 women. The heterogeneity of the studies and variations of practice limit generalization of findings. However, even with multisite studies enrolling a variety of birth centers and practice changes over time, the consistency of positive outcomes supports this model of care. Policy makers in the United States should consider supporting the birth center model as a means of improving maternal outcomes.
© 2016 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth; birthing centers; freestanding; integrative review; midwifery; prenatal care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26773853     DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.12356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  10 in total

1.  Freestanding Birth Centers: An Evidence-Based Option for Birth.

Authors:  Jill Alliman; Kate Bauer; Trinisha Williams
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2022-01-01

2.  Using a Birth Center Model of Care to Improve Reproductive Outcomes in Informal Settlements-a Case Study.

Authors:  Jacqueline Wallace
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.671

Review 3.  Costing Alternative Birth Settings for Women at Low Risk of Complications: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Vanessa Scarf; Christine Catling; Rosalie Viney; Caroline Homer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Strong Start in birth centers: Socio-demographic characteristics, care processes, and outcomes for mothers and newborns.

Authors:  Jill Alliman; Susan R Stapleton; Jennifer Wright; Kate Bauer; Kate Slider; Diana Jolles
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.689

5.  Regional variations in childbirth interventions and their correlations with adverse outcomes, birthplace and care provider: A nationwide explorative study.

Authors:  Anna E Seijmonsbergen-Schermers; Dirkje C Zondag; Marianne Nieuwenhuijze; Thomas van den Akker; Corine J Verhoeven; Caroline C Geerts; François G Schellevis; Ank de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Next Steps for Transforming Maternity Care: What Strong Start Birth Center Outcomes Tell Us.

Authors:  Jill Alliman; Kate Bauer
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2020-04-11       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Birth Outcomes of Women with Obesity Enrolled for Care at Freestanding Birth Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Cecilia M Jevitt; Susan Stapleton; Yanhong Deng; Xuemei Song; Kaicheng Wang; Diana R Jolles
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Episiotomy for Medical Indications during Vaginal Birth-Retrospective Analysis of Risk Factors Determining the Performance of This Procedure.

Authors:  Grażyna Bączek; Sylwia Rychlewicz; Dorota Sys; Patryk Rzońca; Justyna Teliga-Czajkowska
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 4.964

9.  Are perinatal quality collaboratives collaborating enough? How including all birth settings can drive needed improvement in the United States maternity care system.

Authors:  Audrey Levine; Vivienne Souter; Carol Sakala
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2021-10-26       Impact factor: 3.081

10.  Outcomes of childbearing Medicaid beneficiaries engaged in care at Strong Start birth center sites between 2012 and 2014.

Authors:  Diana R Jolles; Rae Langford; Susan Stapleton; Sandra Cesario; Anne Koci; Jill Alliman
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.689

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.