Literature DB >> 26772632

Metal based nanoparticles as cancer antigen delivery vehicles for macrophage based antitumor vaccine.

Sourav Chattopadhyay1, Sandeep Kumar Dash1, Debasis Mandal1, Balaram Das1, Satyajit Tripathy1, Aditi Dey1, Panchanan Pramanik2, Somenath Roy3.   

Abstract

In the present study, we would like to evaluate the efficacy of modified metal oxide nanoparticles (NPs) as cancer antigen delivery vehicles for macrophage (MФs) based antitumor vaccine. The cobalt oxide nanoparticles (CoO NPs) were promising tools for delivery of antigens to antigen presenting cells and have induced an antitumor immune response. Synthesized CoO NPs were modified by N-phosphonomethyliminodiacetic acid (PMIDA), facilitated the conjugation of lysate antigen, i.e. cancer antigen derived from lysis of cancer cells. The cancer cell lysate antigen conjugated PMIDA-CoO NPs (Ag-PMIDA-CoO NPs) successfully activated macrophage (MФ) evident by the increasing the serum IFN-γ and TNF-α level. Immunization of mice with the Ag-PMIDA-CoO NPs constructed an efficient immunological adjuvant induced anticancer IgG responses, and increased the antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) response than only lysate antigen treated group to combat the cancer cell. The nanocomplexes enhanced the anticancer CD4(+)T cell response in mice. The result showed that Ag-PMIDA-CoO NPs can stimulate the immune responses over only lysate antigens, which are the most important findings in this study. These NP-mediated Ag deliveries may significantly improve the anticancer immune response by activating MФs and may act as adjuvant and will balance the pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory immunoresponse. The crosstalk between the activated MФ with other immune competent cells will be monitored by measuring the cytokines which illustrate the total immunological network setups.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antigen delivery; Cytokines; IgG; Immunotherapy; Metal oxide nanoparticles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26772632     DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.12.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  Nanoparticle Design Strategies for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Praveena Velpurisiva; Aniket Gad; Brandon Piel; Rahul Jadia; Prakash Rai
Journal:  J Biomed (Syd)       Date:  2017

2.  Metallic Nanoparticles for Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Emily Reiser Evans; Pallavi Bugga; Vishwaratn Asthana; Rebekah Drezek
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 31.041

Review 3.  Potential applications of engineered nanoparticles in medicine and biology: an update.

Authors:  Gudepalya Renukaiah Rudramurthy; Mallappa Kumara Swamy
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 3.862

4.  Effect of the hyaluronic acid-poloxamer hydrogel on skin-wound healing: in vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Li; Aimin Li; Fan Feng; Qiyu Jiang; Huiwei Sun; Yantao Chai; Ruichuang Yang; Zhijie Wang; Jun Hou; Ruisheng Li
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2019-04-30

Review 5.  Photodynamic Therapy-Mediated Immune Responses in Three-Dimensional Tumor Models.

Authors:  Nkune Williams Nkune; Nokuphila Winifred Nompumelelo Simelane; Hanieh Montaseri; Heidi Abrahamse
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 6.  Self-adjuvanting cancer nanovaccines.

Authors:  Zhiyun Liao; Jing Huang; Pui-Chi Lo; Jonathan F Lovell; Honglin Jin; Kunyu Yang
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 9.429

Review 7.  Targeting Antitumor Immune Response for Enhancing the Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy of Cancer: Recent Advances and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Yamin Yang; Yue Hu; Hongjun Wang
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 6.543

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.