| Literature DB >> 26771511 |
Md Shariful Alam Jilani1, Jamshedul Alam Mohammad Robayet2, Md Mohiuddin1, Md Rokib Hasan3, Chowdhury Rafiqul Ahsan2, Jalaluddin Ashraful Haq1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Melioidosis, caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, is an endemic disease in Bangladesh. No systematic study has yet been done to detect the environmental source of the organism and its true extent in Bangladesh. The present study attempted to isolate B. pseudomallei in soil samples and to determine its seroprevalence in several districts in Bangladesh. METHODOLOGY ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26771511 PMCID: PMC4714902 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004301
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1Map of Bangladesh showing collection sites (districts) of soil and blood samples.
Shaded areas indicate districts with known melioidosis cases. M = Mymensingh, G = Gazipur, K = Kishoregange, S = Sylhet, N = Narayangange. The distance of Mymensingh, Gazipur, Kishoregange, Sylhet and Narayangange from capital Dhaka is 115, 40, 89, 198 and 14 km respectively. ■ = Site of soil collection; ▲ = Site of blood collection; ● = Capital Dhaka. Source of the map: [9].
Fig 2The effect of adsorption with whole cell P. aeruginosa and B. pseudomallei on the anti- B. pseudomallei IgG antibodies.
Before Ad = Before adsorption; Ps Ad = Adsorption with P. aeruginosa; Bps Ad = Adsorption with B. pseudomallei. n = 24 seropositive sera in each group.
Results of culture of soil samples for the detection of B. pseudomallei from four different melioidosis endemic districts of Bangladesh.
| Place (Districts) | No. of Sites | No. of Sampling points | Location of sampling points | No of Samples | No. of suspected isolates | No. positive for |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gazipur | 4 | 7 | 4 paddy field, 1 cattle shed, 1 poultry shed, 1 riverbank | 41 | 15 | 2 |
| Mymensingh | 3 | 5 | All paddy field | 26 | 4 | 0 |
| Narayangange | 5 | 5 | All paddy field | 31 | 8 | 0 |
| Sylhet | 5 | 5 | All paddy field | 81 | 60 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 22 | - | 179 | 87 | 2 |
Bps = B. pseudomallei
Fig 3PCR analysis of B. pseudomallei isolates from Gazipur district.
Lane 1- 100bp Marker, Lane 2- Positive control (USM strain of B. pseudomallei, Lane 3- Negative control (distilled water), Lane 4- K23 (Gazipur soil isolate) and Lane 5- K35 (Gazipur soil isolate).
Seroprevalence of anti- B. pseudomallei IgG antibodies among study population of four districts and mean OD values of positive and negative cases.
| Place (Districts) | Total No. of Samples | Positive for anti- | Mean (±SE) OD of | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number | % (95% CI) | Positive cases | Negative cases | ||
| Kishoregange | 294 | 27 | 9.2 (5.8–12.5) | 1.1 (0.04) | 0.3 (0.01) |
| Mymensingh | 221 | 68 | 30.8 (24.7–36.8) | 1.2 (0.05) | 0.3 (0.02) |
| Narayangange | 214 | 58 | 22.6 (17.0–28.2) | 1.4 (0.05) | 0.4 (0.02) |
| Sylhet | 211 | 50 | 27.5 (21.5–33.5) | 1.1 (0.03) | 0.4 (0.02) |
| Total | 940 | 203 | 21.5 (18.9–24.9) | 1.2 (0.03) | 0.3 (0.01) |
Cut off OD value for positive cases = 0.8
CI = Confidence interval
OD = Optical density
Age specific seropositivity rate of anti- B. pseudomallei IgG antibodies of study population.
| Age group (years) | Total No of samples | Positive for anti- | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | % | |||
| 1–10 | 57 | 3 | 5.3 | 0–11.1 |
| 11–20 | 89 | 20 | 22.7 | 13.9–31.3 |
| 21–30 | 153 | 22 | 14.4 | 8.9–19.8 |
| 31–40 | 174 | 25 | 14.4 | 9.2–19.6 |
| 41–50 | 214 | 56 | 26.2 | 20.3–32.0 |
| >50 | 253 | 77 | 30.4 | 24.8–36.1 |
| Total | 940 | 203 | 21.5 | 18.8–24.1 |
Cut off OD value for positive cases = 0.8
CI = Confidence interval
Distribution of occupation and sex of B. pseudomallei seropositive cases.
| Characteristics | Total No of samples | Positive for anti- | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | % | |||
| Male | 366 | 95 | 26.0 | 20.1–28.6 |
| Female | 523 | 108 | 20.7 | 16.3–23.0 |
| House wife | 473 | 97 | 20.5 | 16.8–24.2 |
| Farmer | 102 | 27 | 26.5 | 17.9–35.0 |
| Service holder | 137 | 33 | 24.1 | 16.9–31.2 |
| Business | 112 | 31 | 27.7 | 19.4–35.9 |
| Others | 115 | 15 | 13.0 | 6.9–19.1 |
No association with gender (χ2 = 3.441, p = 0.064) and with any occupational group (χ2 = 3.835, p = 0.280)
CI = Confidence interval