Literature DB >> 26771427

Mutual Suppression: Comment on Paulhus et al. (2004).

Carol Nickerson1.   

Abstract

Paulhus, Robins, Trzesniewski, and Tracy (Multivariate Behavioral Research, 2004 , 39, 305-328) suggested that the three types of two-predictor suppression situations-classical suppression, cooperative suppression, and net suppression--can all be considered special cases of mutual suppression, in that the magnitude of each of the two standardized partial regression coefficients exceeds the magnitude of its corresponding standardized bivariate regression coefficient. Classical suppression and cooperative suppression can be considered mutual suppression, but net suppression cannot. Hypothetical and empirical examples of net suppression in which the magnitude of the standardized partial regression coefficient for the suppressor variable is greater than, equal to, and less than the magnitude of its standardized bivariate regression coefficient are provided. The empirical examples were drawn from the social psychology literature relating psychological well-being outcomes to life aspirations.

Year:  2008        PMID: 26771427     DOI: 10.1080/00273170802490640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  2 in total

1.  The Geometry of Enhancement in Multiple Regression.

Authors:  Niels G Waller
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Simpson's Paradox is suppression, but Lord's Paradox is neither: clarification of and correction to Tu, Gunnell, and Gilthorpe (2008).

Authors:  Carol A Nickerson; Nicholas J L Brown
Journal:  Emerg Themes Epidemiol       Date:  2019-11-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.