Julia Ann Schillinger1, Rachel Gorwitz, Cornelis Rietmeijer, Matthew R Golden. 1. From the *Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Hepatitis, TB, and STD Prevention, Atlanta, GA; †Bureau of STD Control, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY; ‡Rietmeijer Consulting LLC, Denver, CO; §Public Health-Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA; ¶Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, and ∥Center for AIDS and STD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) is a partner treatment strategy wherein health care providers give patients antibiotics or a prescription to deliver to their sex partners as treatment, without an intervening medical evaluation. METHODS: We used PubMed and the Cochrane database to systematically identify published articles about EPT after 2006 and randomized controlled trials before that date; we also sought conference abstracts and unpublished data from 2013 to 2014. We described key steps in a hypothetical "EPT continuum," beginning with diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a patient and ending with treatment for the patient's sex partner(s) with EPT. All reports were abstracted for a set of defined measures and related interventions. RESULTS: We reviewed 100 published articles, unpublished data reports, and conference abstracts; 42 met the inclusion criteria and provided measures of the following: provider uptake and offer of EPT, patient acceptance and receipt of EPT, patient delivery of EPT to sex partners, and partner receipt of EPT and treatment. Implementation phase, populations, settings, and methodologies varied across reports. Providers' uptake and offer of EPT are rate-limiting steps in the EPT continuum and were the focus of all 5 programmatic interventions we identified. There were 7 population-based measures of patient receipt of EPT; however, several of the patient populations overlapped. CONCLUSIONS: A heterogenous body of literature describes EPT, and variation in study population, setting, and metrics limit generalizability. Programs seeking to increase partner treatment should focus their efforts on provider uptake and offer and should use population-based measures to monitor EPT use.
BACKGROUND: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) is a partner treatment strategy wherein health care providers give patients antibiotics or a prescription to deliver to their sex partners as treatment, without an intervening medical evaluation. METHODS: We used PubMed and the Cochrane database to systematically identify published articles about EPT after 2006 and randomized controlled trials before that date; we also sought conference abstracts and unpublished data from 2013 to 2014. We described key steps in a hypothetical "EPT continuum," beginning with diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a patient and ending with treatment for the patient's sex partner(s) with EPT. All reports were abstracted for a set of defined measures and related interventions. RESULTS: We reviewed 100 published articles, unpublished data reports, and conference abstracts; 42 met the inclusion criteria and provided measures of the following: provider uptake and offer of EPT, patient acceptance and receipt of EPT, patient delivery of EPT to sex partners, and partner receipt of EPT and treatment. Implementation phase, populations, settings, and methodologies varied across reports. Providers' uptake and offer of EPT are rate-limiting steps in the EPT continuum and were the focus of all 5 programmatic interventions we identified. There were 7 population-based measures of patient receipt of EPT; however, several of the patient populations overlapped. CONCLUSIONS: A heterogenous body of literature describes EPT, and variation in study population, setting, and metrics limit generalizability. Programs seeking to increase partner treatment should focus their efforts on provider uptake and offer and should use population-based measures to monitor EPT use.
Authors: Sarah J Willis; Noelle M Cocoros; Liisa M Randall; Aileen M Ochoa; Gillian Haney; Katherine K Hsu; Alfred DeMaria; Michael Klompas Journal: Curr Infect Dis Rep Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 3.725
Authors: Kevin M Weiss; Jeb S Jones; David A Katz; Thomas L Gift; Kyle Bernstein; Kimberly Workowski; Eli S Rosenberg; Samuel M Jenness Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Emily A Groene; Christy M Boraas; M Kumi Smith; Sarah M Lofgren; Meghan K Rothenberger; Eva A Enns Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Jesse L Clark; Eddy R Segura; Catherine E Oldenburg; Jessica Rios; Silvia M Montano; Amaya Perez-Brumer; Manuel Villaran; Jorge Sanchez; Thomas J Coates; Javier R Lama Journal: BMC Med Date: 2017-05-04 Impact factor: 8.775