Literature DB >> 26770941

Long-Term Safety and Longevity of a Mixture of Polymethyl Methacrylate and Cross-Linked Dextran (Lipen-10®) after Penile Augmentation: Extension Study from Six to 18 Months of Follow-Up.

Ma Tae Kim1, Kyungtae Ko1, Won Ki Lee2, Sae Chul Kim3, Dae Yul Yang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of a mixture of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and cross-linked dextran Lipen-10® used for penile augmentation under the physical impact generated during sexual intercourse.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 2010 to October 2011, a total of 20 patients with a mean age of 44 years (interquartile range, 20~70 years) who requested penile augmentation participated in this study. Lipen-10® filler is a mixture of 75% cross-linked dextran, 15% PMMA, and 10% hypromellose solution. With the patient in the supine position, Lipen-10® was injected into the subcutaneous tissue between the dartos fascia and Buck's fascia of the penis using a fanning technique. Penile length and circumference were measured before the procedure and six, 12, and 18 months after the procedure. Values were compared using the Student's t-test and the paired t-test.
RESULTS: A total of 15 patients completed this study. The increases in circumference and length observed six months after the procedure were found to have been maintained without change at 12 and 18 months of follow-up. At 12 and 18 months of follow-up, no abnormal findings were observed. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging conducted at 18 months of follow-up showed no trace of the injected filler having migrated to other sites, and the volume was well maintained.
CONCLUSIONS: Lipen-10®, a mixture of PMMA and cross-linked dextran, showed good durability and tolerability over 18 months of follow-up during which the participants were sexually active.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cross-linked dextran; Filler; Penile enhancement; Polymethyl methacrylate

Year:  2015        PMID: 26770941      PMCID: PMC4709437          DOI: 10.5534/wjmh.2015.33.3.202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Mens Health        ISSN: 2287-4208            Impact factor:   5.400


  14 in total

Review 1.  Collagen fillers.

Authors:  Elizabeth Rostan
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.918

2.  Penile enlargement surgery--fact or illusion?

Authors:  Yoram Vardi; Lior Lowenstein
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Urol       Date:  2005-03

Review 3.  The status of penile enhancement procedures.

Authors:  Yoram Vardi; Ilan Gruenwald
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 4.  Breakthroughs in US dermal fillers for facial soft-tissue augmentation.

Authors:  David J Goldberg
Journal:  J Cosmet Laser Ther       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.247

5.  Tolerability and efficacy of newly developed penile injection of cross-linked dextran and polymethylmethacrylate mixture on penile enhancement: 6 months follow-up.

Authors:  D Y Yang; W K Lee; S C Kim
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.896

6.  Physiological function of connective tissue polysaccharides.

Authors:  W D Comper; T C Laurent
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 37.312

7.  Use of Zyderm in the aging face.

Authors:  F V Nicolle
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 8.  Hyaluronic acid fillers.

Authors:  Gary D Monheit; Kyle M Coleman
Journal:  Dermatol Ther       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.851

9.  Collagen-containing fillers: alone and in combination.

Authors:  Leslie Baumann
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.017

10.  Human histology and persistence of various injectable filler substances for soft tissue augmentation.

Authors:  Gottfried Lemperle; Vera Morhenn; Ulrich Charrier
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 2.326

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Focusing on sexual rehabilitation besides penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy is important.

Authors:  Daphné Vanderhaeghe; Maarten Albersen; Emmanuel Weyne
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 2.  Multidisciplinary approach and management of patients who seek medical advice for penile size concerns: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nicolò Schifano; Omer Onur Cakir; Fabio Castiglione; Francesco Montorsi; Giulio Garaffa
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 3.  Penile girth enhancement procedures for aesthetic purposes.

Authors:  Celeste Manfredi; Javier Romero Otero; Rados Djinovic
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  New bulking agent for the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux: Polymethylmethacrylate/dextranomer.

Authors:  Sang Woon Kim; Yong Seung Lee; Young Jae Im; Sang Won Han
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-04-10

5.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes between Hyaluronic and Polylactic Acid Filler Injections for Penile Augmentation in Men Reporting a Small Penis: A Multicenter, Patient-Blinded/Evaluator-Blinded, Non-Inferiority, Randomized Comparative Trial with 18 Months of Follow-up.

Authors:  Dae Yul Yang; Hyun Cheol Jeong; Kyungtae Ko; Seong Ho Lee; Young Goo Lee; Won Ki Lee
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-05       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Penile Girth Enhancement Using Hyaluronic Acid Filler and the Clinical Impact on Ejaculation: A Multi-Center, Patient/Evaluator-Blinded, Randomized Active-Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sun Tae Ahn; Ji Sung Shim; Woong Jin Bae; Sae Woong Kim; Je Jong Kim; Du Geon Moon
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 5.400

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.