Literature DB >> 26768568

Simulation-guided phase 3 trial design to evaluate vaccine effectiveness to prevent Ebola virus disease infection: Statistical considerations, design rationale, and challenges.

An Vandebosch1, Robin Mogg2, Nele Goeyvaerts3, Carla Truyers3, Brian Greenwood4, Debby Watson-Jones4, Guillermo Herrera-Taracena5, Wim Parys3, Tony Vangeneugden3.   

Abstract

Starting in December 2013, West Africa was overwhelmed with the deadliest outbreak of Ebola virus known to date, resulting in more than 27,500 cases and 11,000 deaths. In response to the epidemic, development of a heterologous prime-boost vaccine regimen was accelerated and involved preparation of a phase 3 effectiveness study. While individually randomized controlled trials are widely acknowledged as the gold standard for demonstrating the efficacy of a candidate vaccine, there was considerable debate on the ethical appropriateness of these designs in the context of an epidemic. A suitable phase 3 trial must convincingly ensure unbiased evaluation with sufficient statistical power. In addition, efficient evaluation of a vaccine candidate is required so that an effective vaccine can be immediately disseminated. This manuscript aims to present the statistical and modeling considerations, design rationale and challenges encountered due to the emergent, epidemic setting that led to the selection of a cluster-randomized phase 3 study design under field conditions.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ebola; modeling and simulation; phase 3 design; statistical challenges; vaccine efficacy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26768568     DOI: 10.1177/1740774515621059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  5 in total

Review 1.  Design of vaccine efficacy trials during public health emergencies.

Authors:  Natalie E Dean; Pierre-Stéphane Gsell; Ron Brookmeyer; Victor De Gruttola; Christl A Donnelly; M Elizabeth Halloran; Momodou Jasseh; Martha Nason; Ximena Riveros; Conall H Watson; Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo; Ira M Longini
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 17.956

2.  Potential test-negative design study bias in outbreak settings: application to Ebola vaccination in Democratic Republic of Congo.

Authors:  Carl A B Pearson; W John Edmunds; Thomas J Hladish; Rosalind M Eggo
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Addressing challenges for clinical research responses to emerging epidemics and pandemics: a scoping review.

Authors:  Louise Sigfrid; Katherine Maskell; Peter G Bannister; Sharif A Ismail; Shelui Collinson; Sadie Regmi; Claire Blackmore; Eli Harriss; Kajsa-Stina Longuere; Nina Gobat; Peter Horby; Mike Clarke; Gail Carson
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 8.775

4.  EBOVAC-Salone: Lessons learned from implementing an Ebola vaccine trial in an Ebola-affected country.

Authors:  Thomas Mooney; Elizabeth Smout; Bailah Leigh; Brian Greenwood; Luisa Enria; David Ishola; Daniela Manno; Mohamed Samai; Macaya Douoguih; Deborah Watson-Jones
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Response adaptive intervention allocation in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials.

Authors:  Michael J Grayling; James M S Wason; Sofía S Villar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.497

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.