Literature DB >> 26767958

Interpreting locomotor biomechanics from the morphology of human footprints.

Kevin G Hatala1, Roshna E Wunderlich2, Heather L Dingwall3, Brian G Richmond4.   

Abstract

Fossil hominin footprints offer unique direct windows to the locomotor behaviors of our ancestors. These data could allow a clearer understanding of the evolution of human locomotion by circumventing issues associated with indirect interpretations of habitual locomotor patterns from fossil skeletal material. However, before we can use fossil hominin footprints to understand better the evolution of human locomotion, we must first develop an understanding of how locomotor biomechanics are preserved in, and can be inferred from, footprint morphologies. In this experimental study, 41 habitually barefoot modern humans created footprints under controlled conditions in which variables related to locomotor biomechanics could be quantified. Measurements of regional topography (depth) were taken from 3D models of those footprints, and principal components analysis was used to identify orthogonal axes that described the largest proportions of topographic variance within the human experimental sample. Linear mixed effects models were used to quantify the influences of biomechanical variables on the first five principal axes of footprint topographic variation, thus providing new information on the biomechanical variables most evidently expressed in the morphology of human footprints. The footprint's overall depth was considered as a confounding variable, since biomechanics may be linked to the extent to which a substrate deforms. Three of five axes showed statistically significant relationships with variables related to both locomotor biomechanics and substrate displacement; one axis was influenced only by biomechanics and another only by the overall depth of the footprint. Principal axes of footprint morphological variation were significantly related to gait type (walking or running), kinematics of the hip and ankle joints and the distribution of pressure beneath the foot. These results provide the first quantitative framework for developing hypotheses regarding the biomechanical patterns reflected by fossil hominin footprints by demonstrating the statistically significant effects of specific kinematic variables on patterns of variation in footprint topography.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ileret; Kenya; Laetoli; Locomotion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26767958     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Evol        ISSN: 0047-2484            Impact factor:   3.895


  6 in total

1.  Laetoli footprints reveal bipedal gait biomechanics different from those of modern humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Kevin G Hatala; Brigitte Demes; Brian G Richmond
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Consistent inconsistencies in braking: a spatial analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra G Hammerberg; Patricia Ann Kramer
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 4.661

3.  Can skeletal surface area predict in vivo foot surface area?

Authors:  E Catherine Strickson; John R Hutchinson; David M Wilkinson; Peter L Falkingham
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Footprints reveal direct evidence of group behavior and locomotion in Homo erectus.

Authors:  Kevin G Hatala; Neil T Roach; Kelly R Ostrofsky; Roshna E Wunderlich; Heather L Dingwall; Brian A Villmoare; David J Green; John W K Harris; David R Braun; Brian G Richmond
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Sexual dimorphism in Homo erectus inferred from 1.5 Ma footprints near Ileret, Kenya.

Authors:  Brian Villmoare; Kevin G Hatala; William Jungers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Footprint evidence of early hominin locomotor diversity at Laetoli, Tanzania.

Authors:  Ellison J McNutt; Kevin G Hatala; Catherine Miller; James Adams; Jesse Casana; Andrew S Deane; Nathaniel J Dominy; Kallisti Fabian; Luke D Fannin; Stephen Gaughan; Simone V Gill; Josephat Gurtu; Ellie Gustafson; Austin C Hill; Camille Johnson; Said Kallindo; Benjamin Kilham; Phoebe Kilham; Elizabeth Kim; Cynthia Liutkus-Pierce; Blaine Maley; Anjali Prabhat; John Reader; Shirley Rubin; Nathan E Thompson; Rebeca Thornburg; Erin Marie Williams-Hatala; Brian Zimmer; Charles M Musiba; Jeremy M DeSilva
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 49.962

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.