Peng Lv1, Gang Chen2, Peng Zhang1. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital Tianjin, China. 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University Jinan, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the ability of the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Correlations between the log odds of positive lymph nodes, numbers of dissected lymph nodes, dissected lymph node stations, positive lymph nodes, positive lymph node ratio, and positive lymph node stations were retrospectively evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients (r), survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier, Cox hazard ratio model, and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The numbers of dissected lymph nodes, positive lymph nodes, dissected lymph node stations and positive lymph node stations significantly correlated with the log odds of positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). The five-year survival ratio of postoperative patients with the log odds of positive lymph nodes <11.412 and >-1.412 were 63.9% and 32.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, age and log odds of positive lymph nodes are independent risk factors for overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.660, 95% confidence interval 2.114-3.346, P < 0.001). A new staging system featuring a combination of log odds of positive lymph nodes and a tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system was established for predicting survival. CONCLUSION: The log odds of positive lymph nodes are superior to the positive lymph node ratio and p-N-stage for predicting prognosis of NSCLC. A new staging system that combines log odds of positive lymph nodes and the current TNM staging system predicts prognosis more accurately than the TNM system alone.
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the ability of the log odds of positive lymph nodes to predict prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: Correlations between the log odds of positive lymph nodes, numbers of dissected lymph nodes, dissected lymph node stations, positive lymph nodes, positive lymph node ratio, and positive lymph node stations were retrospectively evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients (r), survival analysis by Kaplan-Meier, Cox hazard ratio model, and log-rank tests. RESULTS: The numbers of dissected lymph nodes, positive lymph nodes, dissected lymph node stations and positive lymph node stations significantly correlated with the log odds of positive lymph nodes (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively). The five-year survival ratio of postoperative patients with the log odds of positive lymph nodes <11.412 and >-1.412 were 63.9% and 32.5%, respectively (P < 0.001). According to multivariate analysis, age and log odds of positive lymph nodes are independent risk factors for overall survival (hazard ratio = 2.660, 95% confidence interval 2.114-3.346, P < 0.001). A new staging system featuring a combination of log odds of positive lymph nodes and a tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging system was established for predicting survival. CONCLUSION: The log odds of positive lymph nodes are superior to the positive lymph node ratio and p-N-stage for predicting prognosis of NSCLC. A new staging system that combines log odds of positive lymph nodes and the current TNM staging system predicts prognosis more accurately than the TNM system alone.
Entities:
Keywords:
Log odds; non-small cell lung cancer; staging system
Authors: Robert A Ramirez; Christopher G Wang; Laura E Miller; Courtney A Adair; Allen Berry; Xinhua Yu; Thomas F O'Brien; Raymond U Osarogiagbon Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-07-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Zhe Sun; Yan Xu; De Ming Li; Zhen Ning Wang; Guo Lian Zhu; Bao Jun Huang; Kai Li; Hui Mian Xu Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Wendy A Woodward; Vincent Vinh-Hung; Naoto T Ueno; Yee Chung Cheng; Melanie Royce; Patricia Tai; Georges Vlastos; Anne Marie Wallace; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Yago Nieto Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544