Wijnand van den Boom1, Udi Davidovich, José Heuker, Femke Lambers, Maria Prins, Theo Sandfort, Ineke G Stolte. 1. From the *Department of Infectious Diseases Research and Prevention, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; †Department of Infectious Diseases, Tropical Medicine and AIDS, CINIMA, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; and ‡HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies, Department of Psychiatry, New York State Psychiatric Institute and Columbia University, New York, NY.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Group sex has been suggested as a potential high-risk setting for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM). We investigated whether group sex is associated with lower condom use during anal sex and higher proportions of STIs compared with dyadic sex among HIV-negative MSM between 2009 and 2012. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 7 data waves of the Amsterdam Cohort Studies were used. The sample consisted of 465 MSM who either reported both group and dyadic sex (at n = 706 visits) or dyadic sex only (at n = 1339 visits) in the preceding 6 months. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to investigate the association between sexual setting (group vs. dyadic sex), condomless anal sex, and STI. RESULTS: Group sex was reported at 35% (706/2045) of visits. Condomless sex was more often reported during dyadic than group sex (odds ratio, 3.64 95% confidence interval, 2.57-5.16). Men who had group sex were more likely diagnosed as having gonorrhea compared with men with dyadic sex (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.97), but this effect was not retained in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate within-person differences in sexual behavior during group and dyadic sex among MSM. Men were more likely to use condoms during group sex than during dyadic sex. Thus, for some, group sex may not necessarily be risky for HIV infection compared with dyadic sex. However, group sex may be a higher-risk setting for acquiring STIs other than HIV, such as gonorrhea. Group sex encounters should be recognized as distinct sexual settings with specific risk characteristics that need to be addressed accordingly.
BACKGROUND: Group sex has been suggested as a potential high-risk setting for HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) among men who have sex with men (MSM). We investigated whether group sex is associated with lower condom use during anal sex and higher proportions of STIs compared with dyadic sex among HIV-negative MSM between 2009 and 2012. METHODS: Cross-sectional data from 7 data waves of the Amsterdam Cohort Studies were used. The sample consisted of 465 MSM who either reported both group and dyadic sex (at n = 706 visits) or dyadic sex only (at n = 1339 visits) in the preceding 6 months. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to investigate the association between sexual setting (group vs. dyadic sex), condomless anal sex, and STI. RESULTS: Group sex was reported at 35% (706/2045) of visits. Condomless sex was more often reported during dyadic than group sex (odds ratio, 3.64 95% confidence interval, 2.57-5.16). Men who had group sex were more likely diagnosed as having gonorrhea compared with men with dyadic sex (odds ratio, 1.71; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.97), but this effect was not retained in the multivariate model. CONCLUSIONS: Results demonstrate within-person differences in sexual behavior during group and dyadic sex among MSM. Men were more likely to use condoms during group sex than during dyadic sex. Thus, for some, group sex may not necessarily be risky for HIV infection compared with dyadic sex. However, group sex may be a higher-risk setting for acquiring STIs other than HIV, such as gonorrhea. Group sex encounters should be recognized as distinct sexual settings with specific risk characteristics that need to be addressed accordingly.
Authors: F Jin; G P Prestage; L Mao; S C Kippax; C M Pell; B Donovan; P H Cunningham; D J Templeton; J M Kaldor; A E Grulich Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2006-09-27 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Garrett P Prestage; Jeff Hudson; Ian Down; Jack Bradley; Nick Corrigan; Michael Hurley; Andrew E Grulich; David McInnes Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2008-09-26
Authors: Fengyi Jin; June Crawford; Garrett P Prestage; Iryna Zablotska; John Imrie; Susan C Kippax; John M Kaldor; Andrew E Grulich Journal: AIDS Date: 2009-01-14 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Denton Callander; Su Hyun Park; Yazan A Al-Ajlouni; John A Schneider; Maria R Khan; Steven A Safren; Dustin T Duncan Journal: AIDS Educ Prev Date: 2019-04
Authors: Lauren R Violette; Lisa A Niemann; Vanessa M McMahan; David A Katz; Pollyanna R Chavez; Hollie A Clark; Andy Cornelius-Hudson; Steven F Ethridge; Sarah J McDougal; George Ure Ii; Joanne D Stekler; Kevin P Delaney Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2019-11-27
Authors: Mario Martín-Sánchez; Richard Case; Christopher Fairley; Jane S Hocking; Catriona Bradshaw; Jason Ong; Marcus Y Chen; Eric P F Chow Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-11-24 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Chen Lew; Christopher K Fairley; Julien Tran; Tiffany R Phillips; Ei T Aung; Kate Maddaford; Marcus Y Chen; Catriona S Bradshaw; Eric P F Chow Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2022-04-06