| Literature DB >> 26766039 |
Asako Kinoshita1, Ákos Kenéz2, Lena Locher3, Ulrich Meyer4, Sven Dänicke4, Jürgen Rehage5, Korinna Huber2.
Abstract
The glucose homeostasis in dairy cattle is very well controlled, in line with the metabolic adaptation during the periparturient period. Former studies showed that nicotinic acid (NA) lowered plasma non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) concentrations and increased insulin sensitivity in dairy cows. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the expression of proteins involved in hepatic and adipose insulin signaling and protein expression of hepatic glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) were affected by dietary NA and dietary concentrate intake in periparturient dairy cows. Twenty pluriparous German Holstein cows were fed with the same diet from about 21 days before the expected calving date (d-21) to calving. After calving, cows were randomly assigned in 4 groups and fed with diets different in concentrate proportion ("HC" with 60:40% or "LC" with 30:70% concentrate-to-roughage ratio) and supplemented with NA (24 g/day) (NA) or without (CON) until d21. Biopsy samples were taken from the liver, subcutaneous (SCAT) and retroperitoneal (RPAT) adipose tissues at d-21 and d21. Protein expression of insulin signaling molecules (insulin receptor (INSR), phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K), protein kinase Cζ (PKCζ)) and hepatic GLUT2 was measured by Western Blotting. The ratio of protein expression at d21/at d-21 was calculated and statistically evaluated for the effects of time and diet. Cows in HC had significantly higher dietary energy intake than cows in LC. In RPAT a decrease in PI3K and PKCζ expression was found in all groups, irrespectively of diet. In the liver, the GLUT2 expression was significantly lower in cows in NA compared with cows in CON. In conclusion, insulin signaling might be decreased in RPAT over time without any effect of diet. NA was able to modulate hepatic GLUT2 expression, but its physiological role is unclear.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26766039 PMCID: PMC4713095 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Dry matter intake, energy intake, milk yield, and plasma nicotinamide concentration at day 21 (d21) related to calving.
| Group mean | Probability of fixed effects in type 3 test | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | LC-CON | HC-CON | LC-NA | HC-NA | Pooled SEM | Time | Na | Conc | Na × Conc | Na × time | Conc × time |
| Dry matter intake, kg/day | 14.7 | 17.6 | 14.7 | 16.4 | 0.51 | <0.001 | 0.28 | <0.001 | 0.22 | 0.96 | 0.72 |
| Maize silage intake, kg DM/day | 6.25 | 5.34 | 6.34 | 5.11 | 0.26 | 0.18 | 0.77 | <0.001 | 0.52 | 0.80 | 0.015 |
| Gras silage intake, kg DM/day | 4.17 | 3.57 | 4.26 | 3.43 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.88 | <0.001 | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.017 |
| Concentrate intake, kg DM/day | 4.24 | 8.71 | 4.13 | 7.90 | 0.28 | <0.001 | 0.11 | <0.001 | 0.22 | 0.86 | <0.001 |
| NEL intake, MJ/day | 98.3 | 123.9 | 99.3 | 117.1 | 3.82 | <0.001 | 0.45 | <0.001 | 0.32 | 0.97 | 0.45 |
| Milk yield, kg/day | 29.9 | 34.9 | 27.5 | 34.1 | 1.90 | 0.11 | 0.41 | 0.004 | 0.69 | 0.67 | 0.95 |
| Nicotinamide in plasma at d21, μg/mL | 0.66 | 0.66 | 1.40 | 0.92 | 0.13 | - | 0.001 | 0.08 | 0.08 | - | - |
a Group mean: mean from d1 to d21 after calving in each group (n = 5 cows/group); LC-CON: low concentrates (30% on dry matter basis) diet from d1 to d21; HC-CON: high concentrates (60% on dry matter basis) from d1 to d21; LC-NA: low concentrate + 24 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21; HC-NA: high concentrates + 24 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21, SEM: standard error of the mean.
b Na: effect of nicotinic acid supplementation; Conc: effect of concentrate proportion; Na × Conc, Na × time, Conc × time: interaction effects between time, Na, and Conc, DM: dry matter, NEL: net energy lactation.
Concentration of glucose, NEFA, insulin, and RQUICKI at day -21 (d-21) and day 21 (d21) related to calving.
| Group mean | Probability of fixed effects in type 3 test | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | LC-CON | HC-CON | LC-NA | HC-NA | SEM | Time | Na | Conc | Na × Conc | Na × time | Conc × time | |
| Glucose, m | d-21 | 3.87 | 3.90 | 3.85 | 3.94 | 0.073 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.48 | 0.99 | 0.003 | 0.69 |
| d21 | 3.48 | 3.53 | 3.85 | 3.84 | ||||||||
| Insulin, μU/mL | d-21 | 17.3 | 17.6 | 20.4 | 21.6 | 3.18 | 0.004 | 0.27 | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.74 |
| d21 | 10.5 | 12.2 | 11.7 | 14.5 | ||||||||
| Log NEFA | d-21 | 2.44 | 2.38 | 2.42 | 2.36 | 0.12 | <0.001 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.98 |
| d21 | 2.82 | 2.77 | 2.80 | 2.72 | ||||||||
| RQUICKI | d-21 | 0.413 | 0.414 | 0.407 | 0.412 | 0.017 | 0.057 | 0.39 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.59 | 0.49 |
| d21 | 0.406 | 0.387 | 0.383 | 0.374 | ||||||||
a NEFA: nonesterified fatty acids, RQUICKI: revised insulin sensitivity check index.
b n = 5 cows/group; LC-CON: low concentrate (30% on dry matter basis) from d1 to d21; HC-CON = high concentrates (60% on dry matter basis) from d1 to d21; LC-NA: low concentrates + 24 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21; HC-NA: high concentrates + 24 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21, SEM: standard error of the mean
c Na: effect of nicotinic acid supplementation; Conc: effect of concentrate proportion; Na × Conc, Na × time, Conc × time: interaction effects between time, Na, and Conc.
d values after logarithmic transformation.
Effects of diet on the ratio of the expression of hepatic key proteins of insulin signaling and glucose transport.
| Group mean | Probability of fixed effects in type 3 test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | LC-CON | HC-CON | LC-NA | HC-NA | PooledSEM | Na | Conc | Na × Conc |
| INSR | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.96 | 0.80 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.40 | 0.37 |
| Precursor | 1.04 | 1.11 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.15 | 0.19 | 0.71 | 0.91 |
| PI3K | 1.00 | 1.04 | 0.87 | 0.77 | 0.11 | 0.082 | 0.76 | 0.53 |
| GLUT2 | 0.918 | 1.17 | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.087 | 0.033 | 0.090 | 0.31 |
a ratio = protein expression d21/d-21; ratio > 1: increase, ratio < 1: decrease.
b INSR: insulin receptor, precursor: precursor of INSR; PI3K: phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; GLUT2: glucose transporter 2.
c n = 5 cows/group; LC-CON: low concentrate (30% on dry matter basis) from d1 to d21; HC-CON: high concentrate (60% on dry matter basis) from d1 to d21; LC-NA: low concentrate + 24 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21; HC-NA: high concentrate + 24 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21; SEM: standard error of the mean.
d Na: effect of nicotinic acid supplementation; Conc: effect of concentrate proportion; Na × Conc: interaction effects between Na and Conc.
Fig 1Hepatic protein expression as affected by NA and adipose protein expression as affected by time.
A: The ratios of pooled groups (pool “NA” = HC-NA, LC-NA and pool “CON” = HC-CON, LC-CON, 24 or 0 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21) were tested for the influence of nicotinic acid supplementation on the hepatic protein expression of PI3K and GLUT2 by one-way ANOVA (n = 10/group). Hepatic GLUT2 expression decreased from d-21 to d21 (ratio < 1) in cows fed NA, and it was lower in cows fed NA (*p = 0.03) compared to control cows at d21. B, C: The ratios of the protein expression in subcutaneous (B, “SCAT”) and retroperitoneal (C, “RPAT”) adipose tissue from all the cows. Cows were pooled (HC-NA, LC-NA, HC-CON, LC-CON) and tested for the difference to 1 by one-sample t-test (n = 20). The expression of signaling proteins in RPAT was generally lower at d21 compared to at d-21 (ratio < 1; **p < 0.01). Ratio = protein expression d21/d-21; ratio > 1: increase, ratio < 1: decrease; The red line indicates the ratio of protein expression at d-21 (d-21/d-21 = 1). Data are shown as mean ± standard error. NA: nicotinic acid, PI3K: phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase, GLUT2: glucose transporter 2, INSR: insulin receptor, PKCζ = protein kinase Cζ.
Effects of diet on the ratio of the expression of adipose key proteins of insulin signaling.
| Group mean | Probability of fixed effects in type 3 test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | LC-CON | HC-CON | LC-NA | HC-NA | PooledSEM | Na | Conc | Na × Conc |
| INSR | 0.78 | 2.01 | 0.57 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.13 | 0.23 | 0.27 |
| PI3K | 0.94 | 1.32 | 0.96 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.52 |
| PKCζ | 1.37 | 1.30 | 1.22 | 0.86 | 0.47 | 0.54 | 0.66 | 0.76 |
| INSR | 0.64 | 0.86 | 1.19 | 0.66 | 0.32 | 0.59 | 0.64 | 0.26 |
| PI3K | 0.82 | 0.71 | 0.68 | 0.90 | 0.14 | 0.87 | 0.71 | 0.28 |
| PKCζ | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.48 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.69 | 0.79 |
a ratio = protein expression d21/d-21; ratio > 1: increase, ratio < 1: decrease.
b SCAT = subcutaneous adipose tissue; RPAT = retroperitoneal adipose tissue; INSR = insulin receptor; PI3K = phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PKCζ = protein kinase Cζ.
c n = 5 cows/group; LC-CON: low concentrate (30% on dry matter basis) from d1 to d21; HC-CON: high concentrate (60% on dry matter basis) from d1 to d21; LC-NA: low concentrate + 24 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21; HC-NA: high concentrate + 24 g/d nicotinic acid from d1 to d21; SEM: standard error of the mean.
d Na: effect of nicotinic acid supplementation; Conc: effect of concentrate proportion; Na × Conc: interaction effects between Na and Conc.