Carol S Camlin1, Torsten B Neilands, Thomas A Odeny, Rita Lyamuya, Alice Nakiwogga-Muwanga, Lameck Diero, Mwebesa Bwana, Paula Braitstein, Geoffrey Somi, Andrew Kambugu, Elizabeth A Bukusi, David V Glidden, Kara K Wools-Kaloustian, Megan Wenger, Elvin H Geng. 1. aDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive SciencesbCenter for AIDS Prevention Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California, USAcResearch Care and Training Program, Center for Microbiology Research and the Family AIDS Care and Education Services Program, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, KenyadNational AIDS Control Program, Dar es Salaam, TanzaniaeInfectious Diseases Institute, Kampala, UgandafKenya Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare (AMPATH), Moi University, Eldoret, KenyagMbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, UgandahDivision of Epidemiology, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, CanadaiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco California USA.jDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IndianakDivision of HIV/AIDS, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Engagement in care is key to successful HIV treatment in resource-limited settings; yet little is known about the magnitude and determinants of reengagement among patients out of care. We assessed patient-reported reasons for not returning to clinic, identified latent variables underlying these reasons, and examined their influence on subsequent care reengagement. DESIGN: We used data from the East Africa International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS to identify a cohort of patients disengaged from care (>3 months late for last appointment, reporting no HIV care in preceding 3 months) (n = 430) who were interviewed about reasons why they stopped care. Among the 399 patients for whom follow-up data were available, 104 returned to clinic within a median observation time of 273 days (interquartile range: 165-325). METHODS: We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) to identify latent variables underlying patient-reported reasons, then used these factors as predictors of time to clinic return in adjusted Cox regression models. RESULTS: EFA and CFA findings suggested a six-factor structure that lent coherence to the range of barriers and motivations underlying care disengagement, including poverty, transport costs, and interference with work responsibilities; health system 'failures,' including poor treatment by providers; fearing disclosure of HIV status; feeling healthy; and treatment fatigue/seeking spiritual alternatives to medicine. Factors related to poverty and poor treatment predicted higher rate of return to clinic, whereas the treatment fatigue factor was suggestive of a reduced rate of return. CONCLUSION: Certain barriers to reengagement appear easier to overcome than factors such as treatment fatigue. Further research will be needed to identify the easiest, least expensive interventions to reengage patients lost to HIV care systems. Interpersonal interventions may continue to play an important role in addressing psychological barriers to retention.
OBJECTIVE: Engagement in care is key to successful HIV treatment in resource-limited settings; yet little is known about the magnitude and determinants of reengagement among patients out of care. We assessed patient-reported reasons for not returning to clinic, identified latent variables underlying these reasons, and examined their influence on subsequent care reengagement. DESIGN: We used data from the East Africa International Epidemiologic Databases to Evaluate AIDS to identify a cohort of patients disengaged from care (>3 months late for last appointment, reporting no HIV care in preceding 3 months) (n = 430) who were interviewed about reasons why they stopped care. Among the 399 patients for whom follow-up data were available, 104 returned to clinic within a median observation time of 273 days (interquartile range: 165-325). METHODS: We conducted exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) to identify latent variables underlying patient-reported reasons, then used these factors as predictors of time to clinic return in adjusted Cox regression models. RESULTS:EFA and CFA findings suggested a six-factor structure that lent coherence to the range of barriers and motivations underlying care disengagement, including poverty, transport costs, and interference with work responsibilities; health system 'failures,' including poor treatment by providers; fearing disclosure of HIV status; feeling healthy; and treatment fatigue/seeking spiritual alternatives to medicine. Factors related to poverty and poor treatment predicted higher rate of return to clinic, whereas the treatment fatigue factor was suggestive of a reduced rate of return. CONCLUSION: Certain barriers to reengagement appear easier to overcome than factors such as treatment fatigue. Further research will be needed to identify the easiest, least expensive interventions to reengage patients lost to HIV care systems. Interpersonal interventions may continue to play an important role in addressing psychological barriers to retention.
Authors: Kara Wools-Kaloustian; Silvester Kimaiyo; Lameck Diero; Abraham Siika; John Sidle; Constantin T Yiannoutsos; Beverly Musick; Robert Einterz; Kenneth H Fife; William M Tierney Journal: AIDS Date: 2006-01-02 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Martin W G Brinkhof; François Dabis; Landon Myer; David R Bangsberg; Andrew Boulle; Denis Nash; Mauro Schechter; Christian Laurent; Olivia Keiser; Margaret May; Eduardo Sprinz; Matthias Egger; Xavier Anglaret Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Elena Losina; Ingrid V Bassett; Janet Giddy; Senica Chetty; Susan Regan; Rochelle P Walensky; Douglas Ross; Callie A Scott; Lauren M Uhler; Jeffrey N Katz; Helga Holst; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Norma C Ware; Monique A Wyatt; Elvin H Geng; Sylvia F Kaaya; Oche O Agbaji; Winnie R Muyindike; Guerino Chalamilla; Patricia A Agaba Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2013-01-08 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Peter F Rebeiro; Giorgos Bakoyannis; Beverly S Musick; Ronald S Braithwaite; Kara K Wools-Kaloustian; Winstone Nyandiko; Fatma Some; Paula Braitstein; Constantin T Yiannoutsos Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Carol S Camlin; Kara Marson; Alex Ndyabakira; Monica Getahun; Devy Emperador; Ambrose Byamukama; Dalsone Kwarisiima; Harsha Thirumurthy; Gabriel Chamie Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Becky L Genberg; Juddy Wachira; Jon A Steingrimsson; Sonak Pastakia; Dan N Tina Tran; Jamil AbdulKadir Said; Paula Braitstein; Joseph W Hogan; Rajesh Vedanthan; Suzanne Goodrich; Catherine Kafu; Marta Wilson-Barthes; Omar Galárraga Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-05-18 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Lillian B Brown; Monica Getahun; James Ayieko; Dalsone Kwarisiima; Asiphas Owaraganise; Mucunguzi Atukunda; Winter Olilo; Tamara Clark; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Craig R Cohen; Moses R Kamya; Maya L Petersen; Edwin D Charlebois; Diane V Havlir; Carol S Camlin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-23 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Troy J Wood; Kimberly A Koester; Katerina A Christopoulos; John A Sauceda; Torsten B Neilands; Mallory O Johnson Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2018-05-24 Impact factor: 2.711
Authors: James Ayieko; Lillian Brown; Sibyl Anthierens; Annelies Van Rie; Monica Getahun; Edwin D Charlebois; Maya L Petersen; Tamara D Clark; Moses R Kamya; Craig R Cohen; Elizabeth A Bukusi; Diane V Havlir; Carol S Camlin Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Aaloke Mody; Ingrid Eshun-Wilson; Kombatende Sikombe; Sheree R Schwartz; Laura K Beres; Sandra Simbeza; Njekwa Mukamba; Paul Somwe; Carolyn Bolton-Moore; Nancy Padian; Charles B Holmes; Izukanji Sikazwe; Elvin H Geng Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2019-10-29 Impact factor: 11.069