Literature DB >> 26765251

Evaluation of mRNA markers for estimating blood deposition time: Towards alibi testing from human forensic stains with rhythmic biomarkers.

Karolina Lech1, Fan Liu1, Katrin Ackermann2, Victoria L Revell3, Oscar Lao4, Debra J Skene3, Manfred Kayser5.   

Abstract

Determining the time a biological trace was left at a scene of crime reflects a crucial aspect of forensic investigations as - if possible - it would permit testing the sample donor's alibi directly from the trace evidence, helping to link (or not) the DNA-identified sample donor with the crime event. However, reliable and robust methodology is lacking thus far. In this study, we assessed the suitability of mRNA for the purpose of estimating blood deposition time, and its added value relative to melatonin and cortisol, two circadian hormones we previously introduced for this purpose. By analysing 21 candidate mRNA markers in blood samples from 12 individuals collected around the clock at 2h intervals for 36h under real-life, controlled conditions, we identified 11 mRNAs with statistically significant expression rhythms. We then used these 11 significantly rhythmic mRNA markers, with and without melatonin and cortisol also analysed in these samples, to establish statistical models for predicting day/night time categories. We found that although in general mRNA-based estimation of time categories was less accurate than hormone-based estimation, the use of three mRNA markers HSPA1B, MKNK2 and PER3 together with melatonin and cortisol generally enhanced the time prediction accuracy relative to the use of the two hormones alone. Our data best support a model that by using these five molecular biomarkers estimates three time categories, i.e. night/early morning, morning/noon, and afternoon/evening with prediction accuracies expressed as AUC values of 0.88, 0.88, and 0.95, respectively. For the first time, we demonstrate the value of mRNA for blood deposition timing and introduce a statistical model for estimating day/night time categories based on molecular biomarkers, which shall be further validated with additional samples in the future. Moreover, our work provides new leads for molecular approaches on time of death estimation using the significantly rhythmic mRNA markers established here.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood deposition time; Circadian hormones; Forensic time estimation; Rhythmic gene expression; mRNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26765251     DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet        ISSN: 1872-4973            Impact factor:   4.882


  8 in total

1.  Compass in the data ocean: Toward chronotherapy.

Authors:  Rikuhiro G Yamada; Hiroki R Ueda
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Investigation of metabolites for estimating blood deposition time.

Authors:  Karolina Lech; Fan Liu; Sarah K Davies; Katrin Ackermann; Joo Ern Ang; Benita Middleton; Victoria L Revell; Florence J Raynaud; Igor Hoveijn; Roelof A Hut; Debra J Skene; Manfred Kayser
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.686

3.  Blood transcriptome based biomarkers for human circadian phase.

Authors:  Emma E Laing; Carla S Möller-Levet; Norman Poh; Nayantara Santhi; Simon N Archer; Derk-Jan Dijk
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 4.  Common Ground between Biological Rhythms and Forensics.

Authors:  Klara Janjić; Christoph Reisinger; Fabian Kanz
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-18

5.  Time-dependent expression of high-mobility group box-1 and toll-like receptors proteins as potential determinants of skin wound age in rats: Forensic implication.

Authors:  Yasmina M Abd-Elhakim; Bothina H F Omran; Shimaa A Ezzeldein; Amany I Ahmed; Nabela I El-Sharkawy; Amany Abdel-Rahman Mohamed
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 2.791

Review 6.  Ten years of molecular ballistics-a review and a field guide.

Authors:  Jan Euteneuer; Cornelius Courts
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  A SNP panel for identification of DNA and RNA specimens.

Authors:  Soheil Yousefi; Tooba Abbassi-Daloii; Thirsa Kraaijenbrink; Martijn Vermaat; Hailiang Mei; Peter van 't Hof; Maarten van Iterson; Daria V Zhernakova; Annique Claringbould; Lude Franke; Leen M 't Hart; Roderick C Slieker; Amber van der Heijden; Peter de Knijff; Peter A C 't Hoen
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 8.  Working Time Society consensus statements: Circadian time structure impacts vulnerability to xenobiotics-relevance to industrial toxicology and nonstandard work schedules.

Authors:  Michael H Smolensky; Alain E Reinberg; Frida Marina Fischer
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.179

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.