Literature DB >> 26764870

Long-term (>10 Yrs) Outcome of the Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion With Duodenal Switch.

Roel Bolckmans1, Jacques Himpens.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to report 10+ year outcome of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (LDS), with special focus on quality of life.
BACKGROUND: : Reports on long-term morbidity and quality of life after LDS are rare.
METHODS: Records of all patients who underwent LDS 10+ years ago were analyzed. Patients were contacted to answer a questionnaire based on Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System. Blood work was reported when performed within the past year.
RESULTS: Of the 153 patients who underwent LDS, follow-up was available for 113 patients (78.5%). Mean follow-up was 130.2 ± 4.6 months. Percentage total weight loss was 40.7 ± 10.8%. Weight loss was greatest in the super obese category (BMI > 50 kg/m). Remission rate for type 2 diabetes was 87.5% (21/24) and for arterial hypertension 80.9% (38/47). Dyslipidemia remission rates were 93.3% (28/30) for total cholesterol, 89.7% (26/29) for triglycerides, and 95.0% (19/20) for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. However, 42.5% of the patients needed reoperation, including 10.6% for correction of protein malnutrition, the latter exclusively in non-super obese individuals. Most common deficiencies concerned vitamin A and D, iron, and zinc. De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease was reported in 43.8%. The Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System score was good at 4.9 ± 2.2, and 82.3% of participants would choose the procedure again.
CONCLUSIONS: LDS is a very effective metabolic procedure, at the cost of occasional protein and other nutritional deficiencies. Outcome in the long term is best in super obese patients. Overall quality of life is good. The high reoperation rate and incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease are concerning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26764870     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  20 in total

1.  A rodent model of partial intestinal diversion: a novel metabolic operation.

Authors:  Rafael Alvarez; Darleen A Sandoval; Randy J Seeley
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.734

2.  How to Switch to the Switch: Implementation of Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch into Practice.

Authors:  Hamzeh M Halawani; Gintaras Antanavicius; Fernando Bonanni
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Limb Length in Gastric Bypass in Super-Obese Patients-Importance of Length of Total Alimentary Small Bowel Tract.

Authors:  Kamran Shah; Bent Johnny Nergård; Morten Wang Fagerland; Hjörtur Gislason
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Safety and Effectiveness of Single-Anastomosis Duodenal Switch Procedure: 2-Year Result from a Single US Institution.

Authors:  Rena C Moon; Lori Gaskins; Andre F Teixeira; Muhammad A Jawad
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  How to Choose the Best Metabolic Procedure?

Authors:  Lidia Castagneto Gissey; James Rossario Casella Mariolo; Geltrude Mingrone
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Options in Bariatric Surgery: Modeled Decision Analysis Supports One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass as the Treatment of Choice when Type 2 Diabetes Is Present.

Authors:  Conor Brosnan; Jarlath C Bolger; Eamonn M Bolger; Michael E Kelly; Roisin Tully; Mohamed AlAzzawi; William B Robb
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 4.129

7.  Laparoscopic Reversal of the Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch: a Step by Step Video Case.

Authors:  Hamzeh M Halawani; Gintaras Antanavicius
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Weight Loss and Nutritional Outcomes 10 Years after Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch.

Authors:  Philippe Topart; Guillaume Becouarn; Jacques Delarue
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Is there a Reason Why Obese Patients Choose Either Conservative Treatment or Surgery?

Authors:  Lars Fischer; Anna-Laura Wekerle; Johannes Sander; Felix Nickel; Adrian T Billeter; Ulrike Zech; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.129

10.  Mid-Term Results and Responsiveness Predictors After Two-Step Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  José M Balibrea; Ramón Vilallonga; Marta Hidalgo; Andreea Ciudin; Óscar González; Enric Caubet; Andrés Sánchez-Pernaute; José M Fort; Manel Armengol-Carrasco
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.129

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.