Jessica H Fan1, Sarah A Lyons1, Melody S Goodman1, Melvin S Blanchard2, Kimberly A Kaphingst1. 1. Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri (Ms Fan, Ms Lyons, Dr Goodman, Dr Kaphingst) 2. Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri (Dr Blanchard).
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between health literacy and overall medication nonadherence, unintentional nonadherence, and intentional nonadherence. Limited health literacy may be associated with worse diabetes outcomes, but the literature shows mixed results, and mechanisms remain unclear. Medication adherence is associated with diabetes outcomes and may be a mediating factor. Distinguishing between unintentional and intentional nonadherence may elucidate the relationship between health literacy and nonadherence in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 208 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited from a primary care clinic in St. Louis, Missouri. Information was obtained from written questionnaire and patient medical records. Bivariate and multivariable regression were used to examine predictors of medication nonadherence. RESULTS: The majority of patients in the study were low income, publicly insured, and African American, with limited health literacy and a high school/GED education or less. In multivariable models, limited health literacy was significantly associated with increased unintentional nonadherence but not intentional nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest differences in factors affecting intentional and unintentional nonadherence. The findings also suggest interventions are needed to decrease unintentional nonadherence among patients with type 2 diabetes and limited health literacy. Efforts to address unintentional medication nonadherence among patients with type 2 diabetes with limited health literacy may improve patient health.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between health literacy and overall medication nonadherence, unintentional nonadherence, and intentional nonadherence. Limited health literacy may be associated with worse diabetes outcomes, but the literature shows mixed results, and mechanisms remain unclear. Medication adherence is associated with diabetes outcomes and may be a mediating factor. Distinguishing between unintentional and intentional nonadherence may elucidate the relationship between health literacy and nonadherence in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of 208 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited from a primary care clinic in St. Louis, Missouri. Information was obtained from written questionnaire and patient medical records. Bivariate and multivariable regression were used to examine predictors of medication nonadherence. RESULTS: The majority of patients in the study were low income, publicly insured, and African American, with limited health literacy and a high school/GED education or less. In multivariable models, limited health literacy was significantly associated with increased unintentional nonadherence but not intentional nonadherence. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest differences in factors affecting intentional and unintentional nonadherence. The findings also suggest interventions are needed to decrease unintentional nonadherence among patients with type 2 diabetes and limited health literacy. Efforts to address unintentional medication nonadherence among patients with type 2 diabetes with limited health literacy may improve patient health.
Authors: Manel Pladevall; L Keoki Williams; Lisa Ann Potts; George Divine; Hugo Xi; Jennifer Elston Lafata Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Melody S Goodman; Richard T Griffey; Christopher R Carpenter; Melvin Blanchard; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2015 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Lee A Lindquist; Lise Go; Jori Fleisher; Nelia Jain; Elisha Friesema; David W Baker Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2011-10-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: M Vervloet; L van Dijk; J Santen-Reestman; B van Vlijmen; P van Wingerden; M L Bouvy; D H de Bakker Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Jeffrey S Gonzalez; Steven A Safren; Enrico Cagliero; Deborah J Wexler; Linda Delahanty; Eve Wittenberg; Mark A Blais; James B Meigs; Richard W Grant Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2007-05-29 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Stacy Cooper Bailey; Angela G Brega; Trisha M Crutchfield; Tom Elasy; Haley Herr; Kimberly Kaphingst; Andrew J Karter; Sarah Moreland-Russell; Chandra Y Osborn; Michael Pignone; Russell Rothman; Dean Schillinger Journal: Diabetes Educ Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 2.140
Authors: Erika A Waters; Caitlin Biddle; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Elizabeth Schofield; Marc T Kiviniemi; Heather Orom; Yuelin Li; Jennifer L Hay Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jane E Hamilton; Eduardo Blanco; Salih Selek; Kelly L Wirfel; Elmer V Bernstam; Dawn Velligan; Meghana Gudala; Kirk Roberts Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 2.314
Authors: Marcee E Wilder; Paige Kulie; Caroline Jensen; Paul Levett; Janice Blanchard; Luis W Dominguez; Maria Portela; Aneil Srivastava; Yixuan Li; Melissa L McCarthy Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jared W Magnani; Mahasin S Mujahid; Herbert D Aronow; Crystal W Cené; Victoria Vaughan Dickson; Edward Havranek; Lewis B Morgenstern; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Amy Pollak; Joshua Z Willey Journal: Circulation Date: 2018-06-04 Impact factor: 29.690