Literature DB >> 26763605

Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Takashi Kubo1, Toshiro Shinke2, Takayuki Okamura3, Kiyoshi Hibi4, Gaku Nakazawa5, Yoshihiro Morino6, Junya Shite7, Tetsuya Fusazaki6, Hiromasa Otake2, Ken Kozuma8, Takashi Akasaka9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optical coherence tomography is becoming increasingly widespread as an adjunctive intravascular diagnostic technique in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), because of its ability to visualize coronary structures at high resolution. Several studies have reported that intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance in PCI might be helpful to reduce subsequent stent thrombosis, restenosis, repeat revascularization, myocardial infarction, and cardiac death. The OPtical frequency domain imaging vs. INtravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary InterventiON (OPINION) trial is aimed at evaluating the impact of optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) guidance in PCI on clinical outcomes compared with IVUS guidance. METHODS AND
DESIGN: The OPINION trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, parallel group, non-inferiority trial in Japan. The eligible patients are randomly assigned to receive either OFDI-guided PCI or IVUS-guided PCI. PCI is performed using the biolimus-eluting stent in accordance with a certain criteria of OFDI and IVUS for optimal stent deployment. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography at 8 months. The primary endpoint is target vessel failure composed of cardiac death, myocardial infarction attributed to the target vessel, and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization at 12 months.
CONCLUSION: When completed, the OPINION trial will contribute to define the clinical value of the OFDI guidance in PCI.
Copyright © 2015 Japanese College of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; Drug-eluting stent; Intravascular ultrasound; Optical coherence tomography; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26763605     DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiol        ISSN: 0914-5087            Impact factor:   3.159


  4 in total

1.  Optical coherence tomography- vs. intravascular ultrasound-guided percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Lorenz Räber; Yasushi Ueki
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Three Technologies That Will Guide Revascularization of Chronic Coronary Syndrome Patients into the 21st Century: A Review.

Authors:  Michael A Winkler; Ripa Patel; Weibo Fu; Vishal Arora; Neal L Weintraub
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2021-08-25

3.  Intravascular imaging-guided intracoronary lithotripsy: First real-world experience.

Authors:  Hannah Sinclair; Lampson Fan; Eoin Fahy; Farhan Shahid; Karim Ratib; James Nolan; Mamas Mamas; Azfar Zaman; Javed Ahmed
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2021-08-09

4.  Optical frequency domain imaging vs. intravascular ultrasound in percutaneous coronary intervention (OPINION trial): one-year angiographic and clinical results.

Authors:  Takashi Kubo; Toshiro Shinke; Takayuki Okamura; Kiyoshi Hibi; Gaku Nakazawa; Yoshihiro Morino; Junya Shite; Tetsuya Fusazaki; Hiromasa Otake; Ken Kozuma; Tetsuya Ioji; Hideaki Kaneda; Takeshi Serikawa; Toru Kataoka; Hisayuki Okada; Takashi Akasaka
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 29.983

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.