Literature DB >> 26763510

Radical Prostatectomy Trends in the United States: 1998 to 2011.

Mark D Tyson1, Paul E Andrews2, Robert F Ferrigni2, Mitchell R Humphreys2, Alexander S Parker3, Erik P Castle2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and distribution of radical prostatectomy (RP) in the United States over time. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a serial cross-sectional analysis of time trends using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample of adult men older than 45 years who underwent RP between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 2011.
RESULTS: Weighted estimates revealed that 962,917 men underwent RP during the study period. The annual rate of RP remained relatively stable, from 1425 RPs per million in the period 1998 to 1999 to 1330 RPs per million in the period 2010 to 2011 (7% decrease; P=.90). The annual rate of open RP decreased from 1424 per million to 435 per million (P<.001), whereas the annual rate of minimally invasive RP increased from less than 1 per million to 895 per million (P<.001). Since 2006, hospitals providing open RP decreased by 18% (from 2288 to 1870; P<.001), whereas hospitals providing minimally invasive RP increased by 191% (from 341 to 993; P<.001). The median open RP caseload per hospital decreased by 7% (from 68 to 63; P<.001), whereas the median caseload for hospitals providing minimally invasive RP declined by 17% (from 122 to 101; P<.001). The hospitals providing fewer than 50 minimally invasive RPs per year increased from 12% to 26% (from 144 of 1240 to 3020 of 11,644; P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Per capita utilization of RP in the United States has remained stable from 1998 to 2011. Rapid expansion of the use of minimally invasive RP has reduced open RP utilization rates and median annual hospital caseload.
Copyright © 2016 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26763510     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.09.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  5 in total

1.  Nuclear Shape and Architecture in Benign Fields Predict Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer Patients Following Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Findings.

Authors:  George Lee; Robert W Veltri; Guangjing Zhu; Sahirzeeshan Ali; Jonathan I Epstein; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-06-16

2.  Wide-field optical spectroscopy system integrating reflectance and spatial frequency domain imaging to measure attenuation-corrected intrinsic tissue fluorescence in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Emile Beaulieu; Audrey Laurence; Mirela Birlea; Guillaume Sheehy; Leticia Angulo-Rodriguez; Mathieu Latour; Roula Albadine; Fred Saad; Dominique Trudel; Frédéric Leblond
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Outcomes of health-related quality of life after open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in China.

Authors:  Wei Huang; Yan Zhang; Bai-Hua Shen; Shuo Wang; Hong-Zhou Meng; Xiao-Dong Jin
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 4.  Safety, feasibility and clinical outcome of minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair in patients with previous radical prostatectomy: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Davide La Regina; Paolo Gaffuri; Marcello Ceppi; Andrea Saporito; Matteo Ferrari; Matteo Di Giuseppe; Francesco Mongelli
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.407

5.  Consulting "Dr. Google" for Prostate Cancer Treatment Options: A Contemporary Worldwide Trend Analysis.

Authors:  Giovanni E Cacciamani; Silvia Bassi; Marco Sebben; Anna Marcer; Giorgio I Russo; Andrea Cocci; Paolo Dell'Oglio; Luis G Medina; Nima Nassiri; Alessandro Tafuri; Andre Abreu; Antonio B Porcaro; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Inderbir S Gill; Walter Artibani
Journal:  Eur Urol Oncol       Date:  2019-07-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.