Literature DB >> 26762915

Transcatheter Versus Surgical Closure of Atrial Septal Defects in Children: A Value Comparison.

Yinn Khurn Ooi1, Michael Kelleman2, Alexandra Ehrlich3, Michelle Glanville3, Arlene Porter3, Dennis Kim4, Brian Kogon4, Matthew E Oster4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether a transcatheter procedure or surgical closure offers a better value proposition for atrial septal defect (ASD) closure.
BACKGROUND: Secundum ASDs are common congenital heart defects with both transcatheter and surgical treatment options. Although both options have been shown to have excellent results in children, the relative value of the 2 procedures is unclear.
METHODS: Using data from the Pediatric Hospital Information System for 2004 to 2012, we compared the value of transcatheter versus surgical ASD closure for children ages 1 to 17 years, with value being defined as outcomes relative to costs. Total charges for procedure-related encounters were converted to costs using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios, and all costs were adjusted for inflation to reflect 2012 dollars.
RESULTS: There were 4,606 transcatheter procedures and 3,159 surgeries at 35 children's hospitals. Those undergoing transcatheter closure were more likely to be older (5.6 years vs. 4.5 years, p < 0.0001). There was no mortality in either group. Children with a surgical procedure had a longer length of stay (4.0 days vs. 1.5 days, p < 0.0001), were more likely to have an infection (odds ratio: 3.73, p < 0.0001) or procedural complication (odds ratio: 6.66, p < 0.0001). Costs for transcatheter procedure encounters were lower than costs for surgical encounters (mean of $19,128 vs. $25,359, p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Both transcatheter and surgical ASD closure had excellent short-term outcomes, but transcatheter procedures had lower lengths of stay, rates of infection, and complications, resulting in lower overall costs. For children who are eligible, transcatheter ASD closure provides better short-term value than surgery.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial septal defect; outcome; surgery; transcatheter; value

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26762915     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  23 in total

Review 1.  State-of-the-Art Atrial Septal Defect Closure Devices for Congenital Heart.

Authors:  Michael L O'Byrne; Daniel S Levi
Journal:  Interv Cardiol Clin       Date:  2019-01

2.  Impact of hospital volume on outcomes of percutaneous ASD/PFO closure in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Parth Bhatt; Achint Patel; Varun Kumar; Anusha Lekshminarayanan; Viranchi Patel; Srilatha Alapati; Zeenia Cyrus Billimoria
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 2.764

3.  Increasing propensity to pursue operative closure of atrial septal defects following changes in the instructions for use of the Amplatzer Septal Occluder device: An observational study using data from the Pediatric Health Information Systems database.

Authors:  Michael L O'Byrne; Russell T Shinohara; Elena K Grant; Joshua P Kanter; Matthew J Gillespie; Yoav Dori; Jonathan J Rome; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 4.749

4.  Lower Hospital Charges and Societal Costs for Catheter Device Closure of Atrial Septal Defects.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanchez; Michael D Seckeler
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 1.655

5.  Differences in Cost of Care by Palliation Strategy for Infants With Ductal-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow.

Authors:  Bryan H Goldstein; Michael L O'Byrne; Christopher J Petit; Athar M Qureshi; Dingwei Dai; Heather M Griffis; Ashton France; Michael S Kelleman; Courtney E McCracken; Christopher E Mascio; Subi Shashidharan; R Allen Ligon; Wendy Whiteside; W Jack Wallen; Hitesh Agrawal; Varun Aggarwal; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 6.546

Review 6.  Transcatheter device closure of atrial septal defects: more to think about than just closing the hole.

Authors:  Michael L O'Byrne; Andrew C Glatz; Matthew J Gillespie
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 7.  Atrial septal defect (ASD) device trans-catheter closure: limitations.

Authors:  Alessia Faccini; Gianfranco Butera
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Comparison of Management Strategies for Neonates With Symptomatic Tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Bryan H Goldstein; Christopher J Petit; Athar M Qureshi; Courtney E McCracken; Michael S Kelleman; George T Nicholson; Mark A Law; Jeffery J Meadows; Jeffrey D Zampi; Shabana Shahanavaz; Christopher E Mascio; Paul J Chai; Jennifer C Romano; Sarosh P Batlivala; Shiraz A Maskatia; Ivor B Asztalos; Alicia M Kamsheh; Steven J Healan; Justin D Smith; R Allen Ligon; Joelle A Pettus; Sarina Juma; James E B Raulston; Krissie M Hock; Amy L Pajk; Lindsay F Eilers; Hala Q Khan; Taylor C Merritt; Matthew Canter; Stephan Juergensen; Fatuma-Ayaan Rinderknecht; Holly Bauser-Heaton; Andrew C Glatz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Closure of Secundum Atrial Septal Defects With the AMPLATZER Septal Occluder: A Prospective, Multicenter, Post-Approval Study.

Authors:  Daniel R Turner; Carl Y Owada; Charlie J Sang; Muhammad Khan; D Scott Lim
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 6.546

10.  Transcatheter atrial septal defect closure in an infant (body weight 6.4 kg) using the GORE CARDIOFORM septal occluder (GCSO).

Authors:  Roman Scheidmann; Thomas Paul; Matthias Sigler
Journal:  Mol Cell Pediatr       Date:  2017-11-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.