Literature DB >> 26762887

MSG-Evoked c-Fos Activity in the Nucleus of the Solitary Tract Is Dependent upon Fluid Delivery and Stimulation Parameters.

Jennifer M Stratford1, John A Thompson2.   

Abstract

The marker of neuronal activation, c-Fos, can be used to visualize spatial patterns of neural activity in response to taste stimulation. Because animals will not voluntarily consume aversive tastes, these stimuli are infused directly into the oral cavity via intraoral cannulae, whereas appetitive stimuli are given in drinking bottles. Differences in these 2 methods make comparison of taste-evoked brain activity between results that utilize these methods problematic. Surprisingly, the intraoral cannulae experimental conditions that produce a similar pattern of c-Fos activity in response to taste stimulation remain unexplored. Stimulation pattern (e.g., constant/intermittent) and hydration state (e.g., water-restricted/hydrated) are the 2 primary differences between delivering tastes via bottles versus intraoral cannulae. Thus, we quantified monosodium glutamate (MSG)-evoked brain activity, as measured by c-Fos, in the nucleus of the solitary tract (nTS; primary taste nucleus) across several conditions. The number and pattern of c-Fos neurons in the nTS of animals that were water-restricted and received a constant infusion of MSG via intraoral cannula most closely mimicked animals that consumed MSG from a bottle. Therefore, in order to compare c-Fos activity between cannulae-stimulated and bottle-stimulated animals, cannulated animals should be water restricted prior to stimulation, and receive taste stimuli at a constant flow.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  drinking bottle; intraoral cannulae; taste

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26762887      PMCID: PMC5006140          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjv082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  53 in total

1.  Differential effects of water deprivation and rehydration on Fos and FosB/DeltaFosB staining in the rat brainstem.

Authors:  Lisa L Ji; Helmut B Gottlieb; Maurice L Penny; Tiffany Fleming; Glenn M Toney; J Thomas Cunningham
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Development of sucrose preferences under two levels of water deprivation.

Authors:  J S Cohen; G J Hachey
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1980-06

3.  Rhythmometry on licking rate of the mouse.

Authors:  H Murakami
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1977-12

4.  Quinine and citric acid elicit distinctive Fos-like immunoreactivity in the rat nucleus of the solitary tract.

Authors:  Susan P Travers
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Taste reactivity alterations after streptozotocin microinjection into the mediodorsal prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Bernadett Nagy; Gábor Takács; István Szabó; László Lénárd; Zoltán Karádi
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Glossopharyngeal nerve regeneration is essential for the complete recovery of quinine-stimulated oromotor rejection behaviors and central patterns of neuronal activity in the nucleus of the solitary tract in the rat.

Authors:  C T King; M Garcea; A C Spector
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Orosensory deprivation alters taste-elicited c-Fos expression in the parabrachial nucleus of neonatal rats.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Haino; Shouji Hironaka; Takafumi Ooka; Kenichi Tokita; Yu Kubota; John D Boughter; Tomio Inoue; Yoshiharu Mukai
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.304

8.  Taste-evoked Fos expression in nitrergic neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract and reticular formation of the rat.

Authors:  Susan P Travers; Joseph B Travers
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Blocking glutamate receptors in the waist area of the parabrachial nucleus decreases taste reactivity behaviors in conscious rats.

Authors:  Joseph W Biondolillo; Learnel A Williams; Michael S King
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  Hedonic sensitivity in adolescent and adult rats: taste reactivity and voluntary sucrose consumption.

Authors:  Carrie E Wilmouth; Linda P Spear
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-03-02       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  5 in total

1.  Sweet and bitter taste stimuli activate VTA projection neurons in the parabrachial nucleus.

Authors:  John D Boughter; Lianyi Lu; Louis N Saites; Kenichi Tokita
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  5-HT3A -driven green fluorescent protein delineates gustatory fibers innervating sour-responsive taste cells: A labeled line for sour taste?

Authors:  J M Stratford; E D Larson; R Yang; E Salcedo; T E Finger
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Genetic Deletion of TrpV1 and TrpA1 Does Not Alter Avoidance of or Patterns of Brainstem Activation to Citric Acid in Mice.

Authors:  Tian Yu; Courtney E Wilson; Jennifer M Stratford; Thomas E Finger
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Sonic hedgehog from both nerves and epithelium is a key trophic factor for taste bud maintenance.

Authors:  David Castillo-Azofeifa; Justin T Losacco; Ernesto Salcedo; Erin J Golden; Thomas E Finger; Linda A Barlow
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 6.868

5.  Immunocytochemical organization and sour taste activation in the rostral nucleus of the solitary tract of mice.

Authors:  Jennifer M Stratford; John A Thompson; Thomas E Finger
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.215

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.