| Literature DB >> 26762530 |
Baljinder Singh Kauldhar1, Balwinder Singh Sooch2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Catalase (EC 1.11.1.6) is one of the important industrial enzyme employed in diagnostic and analytical methods in the form of biomarkers and biosensors in addition to their enormous applications in textile, paper, food and pharmaceutical sectors. The present study demonstrates the utility of a newly isolated and adapted strain of genus Geobacillus possessing unique combination of several industrially important extremophilic properties for the hyper production of catalase. The bacterium can grow over a wide range of pH (3-12) and temperature (10-90 °C) with extraordinary capability to produce catalase.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26762530 PMCID: PMC5377025 DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0410-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Cell Fact ISSN: 1475-2859 Impact factor: 5.328
Fig. 1Soil to industrial applications: Schematic overview of microbial bioprocess for catalase production
Fig. 2a Growth curve of Geobacillus sp. BSS-7; influence of medium constituents on catalase production b carbon sources, c sucrose concentration, d nitrogen sources, e yeast extract concentration
Influence of metal salts on the production of catalase from Geobacillus sp. BSS-7
| Metal salts (%, w/v) | Catalase activity (IU/mg of cells) | Biomass (g/100 ml) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 30,100 | 0.70 |
| CaCl2 | ||
| 0.001 | 13,400 | 0.58 |
| 0.01 | 21,400 | 0.67 |
| 0.05 | 23,400 | 0.74 |
| 0.10 | 20,600 | 0.63 |
| ZnSO4 | ||
| 0.001 | 11,200 | 0.49 |
| 0.01 | 24,500 | 0.70 |
| 0.05 | 12,700 | 0.57 |
| 0.10 | 8700 | 0.37 |
| MnSO4 | ||
| 0.001 | 6500 | 0.29 |
| 0.01 | 10,200 | 0.43 |
| 0.05 | 15,900 | 0.59 |
| 0.10 | 11,200 | 0.47 |
| MgSO4 | ||
| 0.001 | 17,800 | 0.24 |
| 0.01 | 19,300 | 0.31 |
| 0.05 | 22,300 | 0.39 |
| 0.10 | 12,300 | 0.19 |
| FeSO4 | ||
| 0.001 | 9100 | 0.41 |
| 0.01 | 17,400 | 0.47 |
| 0.05 | 12,800 | 0.37 |
| 0.10 | 10,100 | 0.30 |
| BaCl2 | ||
| 0.001 | 23,000 | 0.64 |
| 0.01 | 31,200 | 0.72 |
| 0.05 | 36,400 | 0.85 |
| 0.10 | 16,700 | 0.36 |
| KI | ||
| 0.001 | 4300 | 0.30 |
| 0.01 | 10,400 | 0.41 |
| 0.05 | 11,220 | 0.49 |
| 0.10 | 1340 | 0.13 |
| Na2SO3 | ||
| 0.001 | 900 | 0.09 |
| 0.01 | 5400 | 0.23 |
| 0.05 | 8300 | 0.34 |
| 0.10 | 4800 | 0.17 |
| Na2MoO4 | ||
| 0.001 | 13,400 | 0.50 |
| 0.01 | 21,300 | 0.63 |
| 0.05 | 20,200 | 0.49 |
| 0.10 | 8100 | 0.29 |
Fig. 3Influence of process parameters on catalase production from Geobacillus sp. BSS-7 a pH, b temperature, c inoculum age, d inoculum size, e agitation rate and f incubation time
Fig. 4Transmission Electron Micrographs of Geobacillus sp. BSS-7 showing cell morphology at a 20 °C, b 50 °C, c 80 °C
Central composite design matrix for experimental and predicted results for catalase activity
| Run | Factorsa | Experimental results | Predicted results | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | E | F | Catalase activity (IU/mg wet weight) | ||
| 1 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 24.00 | 42,100 | 42,200 |
| 2 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 19,500 | 19,400 |
| 3 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 18.00 | 5.00 | 12.00 | 25,600 | 25,700 |
| 4 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 12.00 | 36,800 | 35,900 |
| 5 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 12.00 | 5.00 | 12.00 | 46,700 | 47,400 |
| 6 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.06 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 24.00 | 41,900 | 41,500 |
| 7 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 12.00 | 20,800 | 20,600 |
| 8 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 19,500 | 19,400 |
| 9 | 2.00 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 18.00 | 1.00 | 24.00 | 40,400 | 40,300 |
| 10 | 2.00 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 12.00 | 32,000 | 32,100 |
| 11 | 2.00 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 24.00 | 35,200 | 35,400 |
| 12 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 19,500 | 19,200 |
| 13 | 2.00 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 18.00 | 5.00 | 12.00 | 41,900 | 41,600 |
| 14 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 18.00 | 1.00 | 24.00 | 38,500 | 38,200 |
| 15 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 18.00 | 1.00 | 24.00 | 21,800 | 20,900 |
| 16 | 0.50 | 1.25 | 0.01 | 18.00 | 5.00 | 12.00 | 23,300 | 23,100 |
| 17 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 12.00 | 42,100 | 42,000 |
| 18 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 6.00 | 10.00 | 24.00 | 29,300 | 29,500 |
| 19 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 12.00 | 39,100 | 39,200 |
| 20 | 0.50 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 18.00 | 1.00 | 12.00 | 30,300 | 30,000 |
| 21 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 19,500 | 19,300 |
| 22 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 6.00 | 1.00 | 24.00 | 42,600 | 42,100 |
| 23 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 19,500 | 19,400 |
| 24 | 2.00 | 0.25 | 0.10 | 18.00 | 5.00 | 24.00 | 38,000 | 38,100 |
| 25 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 19,500 | 19,200 |
| 26 | 2.00 | 1.00 | 0.01 | 18.00 | 5.00 | 24.00 | 32,000 | 31,700 |
| 27 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 40,200 | 40,400 |
| 28 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 40,200 | 40,400 |
| 29 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 40,200 | 40,400 |
| 30 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 40,200 | 40,400 |
| 31 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 19,500 | 19,700 |
| 32 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 8.61 | 24,800 | 24,600 |
| 33 | 2.42 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 32,500 | 32,200 |
| 34 | 1.25 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 9400 | 9000 |
| 35 | 0.25 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 30,000 | 28,900 |
| 36 | 1.25 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 40,200 | 40,400 |
| 37 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.02 | 12.00 | 8.00 | 18.00 | 28,200 | 28,000 |
| 38 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 21.39 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 39,500 | 40,000 |
| 39 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 18.00 | 11,200 | 11,500 |
| 40 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 6.13 | 18.00 | 42,100 | 41,900 |
| 41 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.13 | 12.00 | 8.00 | 18.00 | 40,500 | 39,800 |
| 42 | 1.25 | 0.63 | 0.06 | 12.00 | 3.00 | 27.39 | 24,600 | 24,700 |
aSymbols A, B, C, D, E, F are the same as mentioned in Table 5
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and model coefficients estimated by multiple linear regression for response surface quadratic model
| Factorsa | Catalase activity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of squares | df |
| Coefficient estimate | Standard error |
| |
| Model | 4.857E+009 | 27 | 0.0041 | 19995.27 | 2563.98 | 11.76 |
| A | 9.897E+007 | 1 | 0.0021 | 2312.83 | 1968.55 | 49.7 |
| B | 2.955E+008 | 1 | 0.0053 | 3989.95 | 1968.55 | 20.08 |
| C | 3.788E+007 | 1 | 0.0124 | 1430.80 | 1968.55 | 10.04 |
| D | 9.9920E+006 | 1 | 0.0134 | −732.22 | 1968.55 | 32.63 |
| E | 1.830E+008 | 1 | 0.0001 | 3145.41 | 1968.55 | 15.06 |
| F | 7.138E+006 | 1 | 0.0244 | 621.15 | 1968.55 | 1.34 |
| AB | 1.353E+008 | 1 | 0.0061 | −2849.29 | 2074.24 | 19.57 |
| AC | 1.562E+008 | 1 | 0.2321 | 3062.07 | 2074.24 | 0.81 |
| AD | 3.113E+008 | 1 | 0.0126 | 4322.13 | 2074.24 | 11.97 |
| AE | 2.914E+006 | 1 | 0.4421 | −418.17 | 2074.24 | 0.55 |
| AF | 1.167E+005 | 1 | 0.0403 | −83.70 | 2074.24 | 1.98 |
| BC | 5.052E+008 | 1 | 0.0093 | 5506.09 | 2074.24 | 12.54 |
| BD | 7.663E+006 | 1 | 0.0042 | 678.11 | 2074.24 | 2.62 |
| BE | 5.779E+007 | 1 | 0.0002 | −1862.18 | 2074.24 | 3.21 |
| BF | 1.168E+008 | 1 | 0.0065 | 2647.28 | 2074.24 | 17.57 |
| CD | 4.738E+006 | 1 | 0.0036 | −533.24 | 2074.24 | 20.12 |
| CE | 1.872E+008 | 1 | 0.2145 | 3351.46 | 2074.24 | 1.37 |
| CF | 9.117E+007 | 1 | 0.0003 | −2339.07 | 2074.24 | 17.32 |
| DE | 3.217E+006 | 1 | 0.0074 | 439.34 | 2074.24 | 5.21 |
| DF | 3.978E+007 | 1 | 0.0256 | −1545.12 | 2074.24 | 3.98 |
| EF | 1.216E+006 | 1 | 0.0001 | 270.17 | 2074.24 | 1.28 |
| A2 | 5.006E+007 | 1 | 0.0215 | 1944.21 | 2326.81 | 6.02 |
| B2 | 7.521E+007 | 1 | 0.0324 | −2383.22 | 2326.81 | 8.32 |
| C2 | 4.030E+008 | 1 | 0.0339 | 5516.38 | 2326.81 | 8.11 |
| D2 | 9.377E+008 | 1 | 0.0031 | 8414.95 | 2326.81 | 41.39 |
| E2 | 99503.63 | 1 | 0.0470 | 86.68 | 2326.81 | 2.21 |
| F2 | 3.292E+007 | 1 | 0.0669 | 1576.79 | 2326.81 | 1.24 |
| Residual | 9.321E+008 | 13 | ||||
| Lack of fit | 9.321E+008 | 7 | ||||
| Pure error | 0.00 | 6 | ||||
| Core total | 6.045E+009 | 41 | ||||
aSymbols A, B, C, D, E, F are the same as mentioned in Table 5
Levels of variables chosen for the experimental design
| Symbols | Factors | Actual levels of coded factors | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1.000 | 0.00 | 1.000 | ||
| A | Sucrose (%, w/v) | 0.25 | 1.00 | 2.00 |
| B | Yeast extract (%, w/v) | 0.25 | 0.50 | 1.25 |
| C | Barium chloride (%, w/v) | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.10 |
| D | Inoculum age (h) | 6.00 | 12.00 | 18.00 |
| E | Inoculum size (%, v/v) | 1.00 | 2.50 | 10.00 |
| F | Time (h) | 6.00 | 18.00 | 24.00 |
Fig. 5Response surface curves showing the effect of interaction of two factors on catalase production keeping other factors constant a sucrose and yeast extract, b inoculum size and inoculum age, c inoculum size and barium chloride, d time and sucrose
Fig. 6Influence of bioreactor parameters on catalase production from Geobacillus sp. BSS-7 a aeration rate, b agitation rate, c fermentation time
Comparison of intracellular catalase production from Geobacillus sp. BSS-7 with other microorganisms
| Microbial source | Production media (g/l)* | Process parameters | Catalase production | Reference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | Temp. | Time (h) | Inoculum | Agitation (rpm)/stationary | ||||
|
| Suc (5.5), YE (10.0), BaCl2 (0.8) | 7.0 | 60 | 12 | 5 %, (v/v) | 150 | 105000 ± 2563 IU/mg | Present study |
|
| Pep (10), YE (5), NaCl (10), H2O2 (0.5) | (–) | 30 | 20 | (–) | 130 | 30420 ± 1083 IU/mg | [ |
|
| CSTL (33.8), citric acid (30) | 7.0 | 30 | 40 | 4 % (v/v) | 400 | 20289 IU/ml | [ |
|
| Pep (8.0), YE (3.0), Sodium succinate (5.0), Aminolevulinic acid (2.0 mM), Tween 60 (1.0) | 7.5 | 27 | 24 | (–) | 60 | 16000 IU/ml | [ |
|
| Pep (8), YE (3), NaCl (5), H2O2 (10 mM) | (–) | 27 | (–) | (–) | (–) | 12000 IU/mg | [ |
|
| Glu (3), YE (5), Pep (5), KH2PO4 (1), NaCl (1.5), NaNO3 (10), CaCl2·2H2O (1.7), FeSO4·7H2O (1.3), MnCl2·4H2O (15.1), ZnSO4·7H2O (0.25), H3BO3 (2.5),CuSO4·5H2O (0.12), Na2MoO4·2H2O (0.12), Co(NO3)2·6H | 10 | 55 | (–) | (–) | 200 | 275 IU/g | [ |
Glu glucose; Pep peptone; YE yeast extract; CSTL corn steep liquor powder; Suc sucrose; (–) Data not available