Literature DB >> 26762481

The safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin in female patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: A subgroup analysis of the BRIGHT trial.

Zhenyang Liang1, Yi Li1, Jingping Wang2, Dongmei Wang3, Shouli Wang4, Likun Ma5, Huiliang Liu6, Lixia Yang7, Gregg W Stone8, Yaling Han1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Being female is an independent predictor of adverse events during percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of bivalirudin during emergency PCI in female patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
METHODS: The present study was a subgroup analysis of the randomized Bivalirudin in Acute Myocardial Infarction vs. Heparin and GPI plus Heparin (BRIGHT) trial. A total of 392 female patients enrolled in the BRIGHT trial were assigned to receive bivalirudin with post-procedure dose infusion (n = 127) or heparin with or without tirofiban (n = 265). The primary efficiency endpoint was 30-day net adverse clinical events (NACEs). The secondary efficiency endpoints were 30-day major cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs) and bleeding events defined according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definitions.
RESULTS: For female patients, bivalirudin treatment was associated with significantly lower incidences of 30-day NACEs (6.3% vs. 21.5%, P < 0.001), any bleeding (2.4% vs. 12.8%, P = 0.001) and BARC 2-5 type bleeding (1.6% vs. 7.2%, P = 0.021) compared with the control regimen. The incidence of MACCEs (3.4% vs. 9.4%, P = 0.055) and stent thrombosis (0% vs. 1.1%, P = 0.229) were comparable between the two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that bivalirudin (OR: 0.245, 95% CI: 0.113-0.532, P < 0.001), transradial access (OR: 0.119, 95% CI: 0.067-0.211, P < 0.001), and statin (OR: 0.254, 95% CI: 0.08-0.807, P = 0.02) were independent protective factors for 30-day NACEs in female patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of bivalirudin during emergency PCI for AMI in female patients significantly reduced the bleeding risk with anticoagulation effects compared with heparin with or without tirofiban.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute myocardial infarction; bivalirudin; female

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26762481     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  3 in total

1.  Bivalirudin versus Heparin plus Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in Women Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Bingjian Wang; Jing Yang; Shuren Ma; Xiongwei Xie
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A meta-analysis and cost-minimization analysis of bivalirudin versus heparin in high-risk patients for percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ke-Xin Sun; Bin Cui; Shan-Shan Cao; Wen-Jun Wang; Feng Yu; Jing-Wen Wang; Yi Ding
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2021-05

3.  Safety profile of bivalirudin in Chinese female patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a multi-center study.

Authors:  Fan Wu; Xueying Liu; Huazhong Ran; Qiwei Tang; Cheng Zhong; Yanqing Wu; Jun Xiao
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.298

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.