Literature DB >> 26762205

Impacts on Emergency Department Visits from Personal Responsibility Provisions: Evidence from West Virginia's Medicaid Redesign.

Tami Gurley-Calvez1, Genevieve M Kenney2, Kosali I Simon3, Douglas Wissoker4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of a 2007 redesign of West Virginia's Medicaid program, which included an incentive and "nudging" scheme intended to encourage better health care behaviors and reduce Emergency Department (ED) visits. DATA SOURCES: West Virginia Medicaid enrollment and claims data from 2005 to 2010. STUDY
DESIGN: We utilized a "differences in differences" technique with individual and time fixed effects to assess the impact of redesign on ED visits. Starting in 2007, categorically eligible Medicaid beneficiaries were moved from traditional Medicaid to the new Mountain Health Choices (MHC) Program on a rolling basis, approximating a natural experiment. Members chose between a Basic plan, which was less generous than traditional Medicaid, or an Enhanced plan, which was more generous but required additional enrollment steps. DATA COLLECTION: Data were obtained from the West Virginia Bureau for Medical Services. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: We found that contrary to intentions, the MHC program increased ED visits. Those who selected or defaulted into the Basic plan experienced increased overall and preventable ED visits, while those who selected the Enhanced plan experienced a slight reduction in preventable ED visits; the net effect was an increase in ED visits, as most individuals enrolled in the Basic plan. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Keywords:  ED visits; Medicaid reform; Mountain Health Choices; personal responsibility

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26762205      PMCID: PMC4946032          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  17 in total

1.  Medicaid 1915(c) home and community-based services waivers: a national survey of eligibility criteria, caps, and waiting lists.

Authors:  Martin Kitchener; Terence Ng; Charlene Harrington
Journal:  Home Health Care Serv Q       Date:  2004

2.  Short-term impacts of coverage loss in a Medicaid population: early results from a prospective cohort study of the Oregon Health Plan.

Authors:  Matthew J Carlson; Jennifer DeVoe; Bill J Wright
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Evaluating pay-for-performance in medicaid through real-world observation.

Authors:  Jon B Christianson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Making pay-for-performance work in Medicaid.

Authors:  Suzanne Felt-Lisk; Gilbert Gimm; Stephanie Peterson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Choice in public health insurance: evidence from West Virginia medicaid redesign.

Authors:  Tami Gurley-Calvez; Adam Pellillo; M Paula Fitzgerald; Michael F Walsh
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Incentives in health: different prescriptions for physicians and patients.

Authors:  George Loewenstein; Kevin G Volpp; David A Asch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Managed care and infant health: an evaluation of Medicaid in the US.

Authors:  Robert Kaestner; Lisa Dubay; Genevieve Kenney
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007.

Authors:  Ning Tang; John Stein; Renee Y Hsia; Judith H Maselli; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Care patterns in Medicare and their implications for pay for performance.

Authors:  Hoangmai H Pham; Deborah Schrag; Ann S O'Malley; Beny Wu; Peter B Bach
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Impact of Medicaid prior authorization requirement for COX-2 inhibitor drugs in Nebraska.

Authors:  Mark V Siracuse; Phillip J Vuchetich
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.402

View more
  1 in total

1.  Medicaid and CHIP Child Health Beneficiary Incentives: Program Landscape and Stakeholder Insights.

Authors:  Connor A Moseley; Madhulika Vulimiri; Robert S Saunders; William K Bleser; Eliana M Perrin; Sarah C Armstrong; Gary X Wang; Peter A Ubel; Mark McClellan; Charlene A Wong
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 7.124

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.