Literature DB >> 26761834

Effect of Replacing Beef Fat with Poppy Seed Oil on Quality of Turkish Sucuk.

Vel Gök1.   

Abstract

Sucuk is the most popular dry-fermented meat product. Sucuk has a relatively high fat. Poppy seed oil as animal fat replacer was used in Turkish sucuk and effects of its use on sucuk quality were investigated. There was a significant (p<0.5) treatment × ripening time interaction for moisture, pH (p<0.05) and 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) values (p<0.01). Increasing poppy seed oil level decreased (p<0.05) TBARS values. Addition of poppy seed oil to the sucuks had a significant effect (p<0.01) on hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness and springiness values. Cholesterol content of sucuks decreased (p<0.05) with poppy seed oil addition. Using pre-emulsified poppy seed oil as partial fat replacer in Turkish sucuk decreased cholesterol and saturated fatty acid content, but increased polyunsaturated fatty acids. Poppy seed oil as partial animal fat replacer in Turkish sucuk may have significant health benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cholesterol reduction; fat replacer; polyunsaturated fatty acids; poppy seed oil; turkish sucuk

Year:  2015        PMID: 26761834      PMCID: PMC4682526          DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.2.240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour        ISSN: 1225-8563            Impact factor:   2.622


Introduction

Sucuk is the most popular dry-fermented meat product produced in Turkey. It can be produced from beef and water buffalo meat and it may contain beef fat, sheep tail fat, salt, sugar, nitrite, nitrate and/or nitrite/nitrate and various spices (Gökalp ). Sucuk has relatively high fat content ranging from 30 to 40% and fat is easily recognizable in its slices (Yıldız-Turp and Serdaroğlu, 2008). Fat is a major contributor of flavor, texture, mouth feel, juiciness and overall acceptability of the meat products (Muguerza ). However, unfortunately, high amount of fat in meat products is associated with high amount of saturated fatty acids and cholesterol in meat products. Therefore, meat products are blamed for causing hypertension, obesity, cardiovascular diseases and coronary health diseases (Özvural and Vural, 2008). Moreover, high-fat intake also increases risk of some cancers, namely colon, breast and prostate (Chizzolini ). To this end, health organizations all over the world highly recommend limiting the intake of saturated fatty acids and cholesterol (NCEP, 1988). The demand for healthy meat products has recently increased considerably and the food industry has been trying to develop or modify meat products by decreasing amount of animal fat (Choi ; Gök ; Yıldız-Turp and Serdaroğlu, 2008). Several studies have focused on reducing the fat and cholesterol content of meat products (Ilıkkan ; Kayaardı and Gök, 2004). Oilseeds are major source of fat, protein, and carbohydrate and they have potential to be used in nutraceuticals and functional foods (Bozan and Temelli, 2008). Papaver somniferum (poppy) seeds are very popular in Europe and Turkey and are extensively used in bakery products (Erinc ). Poppy seed oil (PSO) contains 73% linoleic, 10% palmitic, and 13% oleic acid as major fatty acids (Gök ; Nergiz and Otles, 1994). The rich polyunsaturated fatty acid content of poppy seed oil makes it a viable alternative to be used in reduced fat meat products. Therefore, the goals of this study were to produce Turkish sucuk using poppy seed oil as partial animal fat replacer and to determine chemical, textural, color and sensory properties of the product.

Materials and Method

Sucuk formulation and preparation

Meat used in the study came from 3-year old mature cows and beef fat was obtained from Portakaloğllları Meat Corporation (Afyonkarahisar, Turkey). Poppy seed oil was supplied locally (Arpacıoğlu Haşhaş Ezmecilik Company, Turkey) and other ingredients were also purchased locally. The lean meat was separated from visible fat, tendons and other connective tissues. The lean meat and frozen beef fat were minced in a cuter (Germany) to a particle size of about 3 mm and subsequently mixed in a mixer. Sucuk formulation contained 9 kg meat (10% fat, wet basis), 1.1 kg beef fat, 0.20 kg NaCl, 0.16 kg garlic, 0.04 kg sucrose, 0.07 kg hot red pepper, 0.04 kg sweet red pepper, 0.08 kg black pepper, 0.080 kg cumin, 0.02 kg allspice, 300 ppm NaNO3 and 150 ppm NaNO2 and 0.002 g starter culture (Lactobacillus plantarum and Staphylococcus carnosus, Bactoferm TM T-D-66, CHR HANSEN, Germany). The fat content of the first batch (control) was adjusted to 20% by adding beef fat. Poppy seed oil was added to the next three treatments of sucuk dough as pre-emulsified fat (PEF) with sodium caseinate (American Casein Company, USA), by replacing 25, 50 and 75% of beef fat, respectively. To produce the poppy seed oil emulsion, 1 part of sodium caseinate and 8 parts of hot water (75℃) were mixed for 2 min in a blender. The mixture was emulsified with 10 parts of poppy seed oil for 3 min. The resultant mixture and frozen fat were ground through 12- mm plate (Esmak Machine Co, Turkey). Sucuk dough coming from the grinding machine was refrigerated at 4℃ for 8 h and was thoroughly mixed in a bowl cutter (Germany) at 10-12 rpm for 2 min. The mixture was stuffed into the natural cow intestine casings of 38-40 mm in diameter. Sucuk samples were held in a tempering room (10-12℃ and 70-75% relative humidity) for 12 h. Then, they were ripened in an incubation room (Germany) for 12 d with the following protocol: 2 d at 90% relative humidity (RH) and 28℃; 2 d at 85% RH and 24℃; 2 d at 80% RH and 22℃; 2 d at 75% RH and 20℃; 2 d at 70% RH and 18℃; 2 d at 65% RH and 18℃.

Proximate analysis

Moisture, fat (ether-extractable) and pH value were determined according to AOAC (1990) procedures on the day 0 (initial), 4, 7 and 12 of ripening. The number of replication was three for the all the properties measured.

Lipid oxidation analysis

The 2-thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) test was used to assess extent of lipid oxidation throughout ripening. The TBARS test was performed as described by Gök .

Texture profile analysis

For texture profile analysis (TPA), sucuk samples having diameter of 38 mm were cut into cylinders with height of 20 mm, and wrapped with plastic, and held at room temperature for equilibration and were then compressed twice with 50% deformation with a stainless compression probe (Bozkurt and Bayram, 2006). TPA tests were performed using a Texture Analyzer (TA-XT plus, Stable Micro Systems Ltd., UK). The stainless compression probe of 5 cm in diameter, mounted to a 50 kg load cell, was used for texture analyses at a crosshead speeds of 1 mm/s (pretest), 5 mm/s (test), and 5 mm/s (post test); time between two compressions, 5.0 s; trigger type, auto-20 g; and data acquisition rate, 200 point/s. The TPA parameters were obtained from Texture Expert software V.1.22 attached to the Texture Analyzer (Stable Micro Systems). They were determined from force-time curves as described by Bourne (1978): Hardness (resistance at maximum compression of first bite to deform the sample; peak force of the first compression cycle in N), cohesiveness (extent to which sample could be deformed prior to rupture; positive force ratio of the second compression area to the first compression area (A2/A1), Gumminess (force necessary to disintegrate a semi-solid sample for swallowing, it is the multiplication of hardness and cohesiveness, N), springiness (a measure of how well a product physically springs back after it has been deformed during first compression, ability of sample to recover to its original height after the deforming force was removed, mm), chewiness (the energy need to chew a solid sample to a steady state of swallowing hardness multiplied by cohesiveness multiplied by springiness in, Nmm)

Color measurement

Color measurements (CIE L*, a*, b*) were taken with a colorimeter (Minolta CR 400, Japan). The samples were placed into petri dishes before taking the readings; no gap existed between the sample and the petri dish lid during measurement. The lens of the colorimeter was placed against the petri dish lid, and six readings were averaged.

Cholesterol content

Total cholesterol content of sucuks was determined as given by Naeemi . Briefly, 1 g of sucuk sample was hydrolyzed with 5 mL saturated methanolic KOH and then, 5 mL of cyclohexane was added and the mixiture was centrifuged at 2,000 rpm for 2 min. The resultant upper phase was analyzed using a gas chromatograph (Agilent 6890, Germany) fitted with a Ultra performance capillary column (25 m × 0.32 mm × 0.52 μm film thickness, HP 5080-8853) under the following operating conditions: carrier gas, hydrogen, at a flow rate of 2.0 mL/min; oven temperature 180 to 280℃ for 10 min; injector temperature of 290℃; and flame ionization detector at 300℃ (Gök ).

Fatty acid composition

Fat extraction and fatty acids methyl esters (FAME) were determined using the AOAC (1990) method. Analysis of the FAME was accomplished using Agilent 6890 gas chromatograph equipped with flame-ionization detector (FID) on a split injector and a fused-silica capillary column (Supelco (USA) SP 2380, 60 m × 0.25 mm i.d., 0.2 mm film thickness). The column was isothermally (180℃) operated, injector and detector were kept at 250℃ and the oven temperature program was at 120℃ for 1 min, and increased to 240℃ at a rate of 6℃/min and then was kept constant (240℃) for 15 min. The flow rate of carrier gas (helium) was 30 mL/min.

Sensory evaluation

An experienced ten member trained sensory panel evaluated sucuk samples. Panel members were either faculty or graduate students of the Food Engineering Department of Afyon Kocatepe University. Four training sessions were held to familiarize the panelists with the sucuk characteristics to be evaluated and the scale to be used. The samples were served to panelists in artificial light (incandescent) at room (22℃) temperature in a random order all together. Unsalted crackers and deionized rinse water were given to panelists between individual samples. A continuous scale between 1.0 and 9.0 was used for the evaluation of the each attribute. Evaluating only four sucuks per session and two sessions per day was scheduled to prevent fatigue (total nine sessions). Panelists evaluated the samples for appearance ((visual impression of the products’ surface - shape, color), cut appearance (visual impression at the cross section - particle size and uniformity, glistening of fat, stickiness)); Texture (perceived firmness in the mouth); Color (red color intensity); Flavor (intensity of poppy oil flavor), and expressed their overall acceptability. The hedonic scale was as follows: 1-3 (not acceptable), 4-5 (fairly acceptable), 6-7 good (acceptable) and 8-9 very good (Gök ).

Statistical analysis

Design of the experimental part was randomized having 4 (treatment levels) × 4 (ripening times) factorial structure. Treatments included control (T1, 100% all animal fat), T2 (25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat), T3 (50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat), T4 (75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat). Storage times were 0, 4, 7, and 12 d. PROC MIXED procedure was used to analyze the data and means were separated when significant (p<0.05) using the Fisher's protected least significant difference test (SAS, 2001). The treatment structure was completely randomized with 3 replications.

Results and Discussion

There was a significant (p<0.05) treatment × ripening time interaction for pH. During the first 7 d of ripening, the pH values of all sucuk decreased due to the production of lactic acid by lactic acid bacteria. For a given treatment, pH showed a decrease from day 0 to day 7 of ripening, however, it exhibited an increasing trend afterwards (Table 1). The decline in the pH can be attributed to lactic acid produced in carbohydrate breakdown during fermentation (Muguerza ), while the increase in the pH can be explained by nitrogenous compounds formed in proteolysis during fermentation (Aksu and Kaya, 2004).
Table 1.

Least square means values for treatment x ripening time interaction on, pH, moisture, fat, and TBARS content of sucuks (n=3)*

Source of variationpHMoisture (%)Fat (%)TBARS
Treatment × Ripening Time
0 T16.07±0.04859.01±0.4321.18±0.180.33±0.018
0 T26.06±0.03960.04±0.5622.10±0.240.32±0.022
0 T36.05±0.03460.28±0.6522.39±0.200.30±0.020
0 T46.04±0.3260.50±0.6722.90±0.260.36±0.032
4 T14.96±0.2949.16±0.4226.86±0.250.47±0.038
4 T24.93±0.2649.93±0.3627.23±0.270.44±0.035
4 T34.89±0.2450.49±0.5427.91±0.300.40±0.032
4 T44.85±0.2751.02±0.5128.05±0.310.39±0.026
7 T14.90±0.2544.27±0.4330.06±0.260.81±0.042
7 T24.86±0.2244.93±0.4130.83±0.240.75±0.038
7 T34.81±0.1945.75±0.3931.15±0.310.71±0.034
7 T44.77±0.1646.37±0.4831.67±0.330.70±0.032
12 T15.06±0.3137.40±0.2437.70±0.270.96±0.054
12 T25.00±0.2638.24±0.2737.92±0.340.93±0.048
12 T34.96±0.2539.81±0.3138.30±0.300.89±0.045
12 T44.93±0.1840.36±0.3438.76±0.360.83±0.034
LSD**0.030.400.260.03

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat.

*Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations.

**LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number.

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat. *Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations. **LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number. There was a significant (p<0.01) treatment x ripening time interaction (p<0.01) for moisture content (Table 1). For a given treatment, moisture decreased with increased ripening time. The percentage decrease in moisture content was 37% in control (T1), whereas it was only 33% in T4. Caseinate used in pre-emulsification of ground poppy seed oil might have increased water holding capacity of sucuks. Similarly, Mallika and Prabhakar (2011) reported increased water holding capacity for the sausages containing milk co-precipitates. Moreover Muguerza used pre-emulsified olive oil in Spanish fermented sausages as partial animal fat replacer and declared higher water holding capacity for these samples as compared to that of control. Fat contents of samples are shown in Table 1. There was a significant (p<0.01) treatment × ripening time interaction for fat content. Fat content increased with ripening time (Table 1) due to water loss during the drying process. Similarly, Soyer reported increases in the fat content of sucuks over ripening time. All the treatments, had fat content of less than 40%, which is the permissible level in Turkish Food Codex (2000). TBARS content is lipid oxidation markers in meat and meat products (Shahidi ). The TBARS values of the sucuk samples are shown in Table 1. There was a significant (p<0.01) treatment × storage time interaction for TBARS. The TBARS values of the control samples increased about 2 fold (Table 1), nevertheless the increase was only limited to 1.3 fold for T4. Our results are not in agreement with the result of Ilıkkan who reported higher TBARS values in Turkish sucuks having hazelnut as partial animal fat replacer. Lower TBARS values with poppy seed oil addition in this study can be attributed to the antioxidant activity of the α-tocopherol, a naturally found compound in poppy seed oil (Erinç ). Moreover, Shahidi (2000) reported that phenolic compounds found in seed oils might have a protective effect on oxidative rancidity. Similarly, poppy seed oil was reported to have more oxidative stability than safflower or flax oil (Bozan and Temelli, 2008). In addition, Severini reported lower TBARS values in fermented sausages having olive oil as partial fat replacer stored than control samples for 30 d. Addition of poppy seed oil to the sucuks had a significant effect (p<0.01) on hardness (Table 2). T1 had higher (p<0.05) hardness, cohesiveness, gumminess, chewiness but lower (p<0.05) springiness than any other treatment. Poppy seed oil addition to sucuks decreased hardness, which is a significant indicator of palatability. Similarly Yıldız-Turp and Serdarogğlu (2008) reported soft texture for sucuk samples having hazelnut oil as fat replacer. On the other hand, Bloukas detected no difference in texture for sausages having olive oil as fat replacer. Hardness and cohesiveness increased with decreased moisture content in this study. Similarly, Rongrong reported increased hardness and cohesiveness for smoked sausages as their moisture content decreased. Springiness is related to elastic properties of sucuk. T4, having highest poppy seed oil and moisture content, was the most elastic one (p<0.05). To this end, Bozkurt and Bayram (2006), reported decreased elasticity of sucuk during ripening period and attributed this decrease to removal of water.
Table 2.

Textural parameters of sucuk (n=3)*

TreatmentHardness (N)CohesivenessGumminess (N)Springiness (mm)Chewiness (N × mm)
T173.60±2.420.33±0.0124.30±1.717.57±0.05184.03±10.34
T259.72±1.890.31±0.00918.22±1.397.85±0.02142.92±8.32
T357.22±1.350.28±0.00715.74±1.337.97±0.05125.41±4.82
T448.07±1.170.25±0.00511.78±1.228.15±0.0395.99±3.56
LSD**3.450.0263.050.1520.44

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat.

*Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations.

**LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number.

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat. *Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations. **LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number. Treatment × ripening time interaction was only significant (p<0.05) for CIE a*(redness) (Table 3). For a given treatment, redness increased with ripening time, which is in line with Erçoşkun , who reported increased redness with ripening time for sucuks.
Table 3.

Least square means values for treatment, ripening time, treatment x ripening time interaction on instrumental color (CIE L*, a*, b*) of sucuk (n=3)*

Source of variationL*a*b*
Ripening time (d)
038.07±1.8519.46±0.9917.13±2.01
1243.55±1.4120.88±1.3515.23±1.95
P-value<.0001<.0001<.0001
LSD0.45-0.28
Treatment
T138.70±3.7218.60±0.7513.66±1.11
T240.41±2.8819.84±0.4715.58±0.82
T341.36±3.2520.82±0.8016.76±1.44
T442.78±2.8821.41±1.2218.71±1.08
P-value<.0001<.0001<.0001
LSD0.65-0.40
Ripening time × treatment
0T135.91±0.3817.97±0.2514.62±0.17
0T237.93±0.4219.44±0.2216.28±0.19
0T338.56±0.5620.13±0.2418.01±0.32
0T440.29±0.7720.30±0.2619.61±0.52
12T141.89±0.6519.24±0.2012.71±0.15
12T242.91±0.8220.23±0.1414.88±0.16
12T344.16±0.9121.52±0.2215.52±0.19
12T445.27±0.9522.53±0.5217.82±0.26
P-value0.11<.00010.07
**LSD-0.54-

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat.

*Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations.

**LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number.

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat. *Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations. **LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number. The dehydration during the ripening period may also affect the light scatter properties on the surface of the product (Bozkurt, 2006; Erçoşkun ). Lightness (L*) values had an increasing trend while yellowness (b* values) had a decreasing trend with ripening time. The decrease in CIE b* values with ripening time can be explained by formation of brown melanoids, product of browning reactions (Bozkurt and Bayram, 2006). On a given ripening day, control samples (T1) had lower CIE L*, a*, and b* values than any other poppy seed oil containing samples (Table 3). Similarly, Ilıkkan reported high CIE L*, a*, and b* values for sucuk samples having hazelnut oil as fat replacer. Tables 4 illustrates cholesterol content and fatty acid composition of treatments. Cholesterol content of sucuks decreased (p<0.05) as poppy seed oil amount increased. The cholesterol contents decreased 22, 49, and 70% for T2, T3, and T4, respectively, which coincides with Choi who reported lower cholesterol contents in reducedfat frankfurter formulated with vegetables oils and rice bran fiber. Similarly, Yıldız-Turp and Serdaroğlu (2008) determined lower cholesterol values for Turkish sucuks having 15-50% pre-emulsified hazelnut oil as animal fat replacers. These findings are very significant because American Heart Association (2004) have recommended less than 300 mg cholesterol intake per day due to cholesterol’s close relationship with cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases.
Table 4.

Cholesterol content (mg/g samples) and fatty acid composition (%) of sucuks and poppy seed oil (n=3)*

ParametersTreatmentsLSD**

PSO*T1T2T3T4
Cholesterol (mg/100 g)-86.04±2.9866.80±1.9643.69±1.5625.38±1.342.88
Fatty acid composition (%)
Lauric C14:0-0.10±0.0280.08±0.0141.16±0.0421.12±0.0560.11
Miristic C14:00.11±0.0082.61±0.0422.00±0.0711.25±0.0570.25±0.0140.14
Pentadecanoic C15:0-1.24±0.0390.63±0.0310.24±0.0250.12±0.0110.09
Palmitic C16:08.07±0.1224.17±0.2521.56±0.1915.23±0.1414.38±0.090.24
Palmitoleic-2.02±0.0442.47±0.0481.46±0.0341.67±0.0390.18
Margaric C17:0-2.75±0.0562.21±0.0450.85±0.0160.82±0.0130.12
Stearic C18:03.61±0.02523.97±0.1917.89±0.1311.32±0.0610.63±0.030.21
Oleic C18:124.28±0.1236.08±0.3933.28±0.3129.17±0.2523.31±0.210.46
Linoleic C18:260.53±0.235.79±0.0818.35±0.1936.90±0.2841.23±0.320.45
Linolenic C18:33.23±0.0210.56±0.050.88±0.091.97±0.142.31±0.25 0.14
Arachidic C20:0-0.78±0.0290.65±0.0230.45±0.0150.23±0.0090.08
SFA11.78±0.0255.55±0.4845.02±0.4130.50±0.3427.48±0.280.76
MUFA24.45±0.01538.10±0.2535.75±0.2330.63±0.1824.98±0.120.45
PUFA63.76±6.35±0.1119.23±0.1938.87±0.2943.54±0.370.44
UFA88.21±0.4144.45±0.2754.98±0.4369.50±0.5168.52±0.440.46
SFA/UFA0.13±0.0051.25±0.0230.82±0.0180.44±0.0120.40±0.0100.02
PUFA/SFA5.21±0.0070.11±0.0120.43±0.0211.27±0.0311.58±0.0380.03

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat.

*Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations.

**LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids.

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat. *Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations. **LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number; SFA, saturated fatty acids; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acids. PSO addition as animal fat replacer changed (p<0.05) the fatty acid composition of sucuks. Addition of PSO decreased (p<0.05) saturated fatty acid concentration (SFA), but increased (p<0.05) polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) concentration (Table 4). Similarly, Ilıkkan reported decreased SFA, but increased PUFA values in Turkish sucuks with hazelnut oil as animal fat replacers. In this study, PSO addition decreased (p<0.05) miristic, pentadecanoic, palmitic, palmitoleic, margaric, stearic, oleic and arachidic acid, but increased (p<0.05) lauric, linoleic and linolenic acid. The percentage of an important fatty acid, linoleic acid, was 5.79% for T1, but increased to 8.35%, 36.90% and 41.23%, T2, T3, T4, respectively, which is very significant because health benefits of oils rich in linoleic acid, like corn or safflower oils, in lowering serum cholesterol levels were reported by several researchers (Belury ; Bozan and Temelli, 2008; Simopoulos, 1997). Polyunsaturated fatty acids decrease plasma cholesterol levels; also they have potential benefits including reduced blood pressure and cardiac arrhythmias (Wijendran and Hayes, 2004). The ratio of PUFA to SFA was 0.11 in T1, however, it became 4, 11, and 14-fold for T2, T3, and T4, respectively. T3 and T4 treatments in this study exceed the PUFA/SFA ratio of 0.45, which has been recommended by The Committee on the Medical Aspects of Food Policy (COMA 1984). The SFA/UFA ratios decreased 34, 65, and 68% for T2, T3, T4, respectively, as compared to T1. This is in line with the results of Choi who reported decreased SFA/UFA ratios in frankfurters having vegetable oil as partial animal replacer. The use of poppy oil in the formulation of Turkish Sucuk had a significant (p<0.05) effect on appearance, texture, color, flavor and overall acceptability (Table 5). The highest appearance, texture, color, and overall acceptability scores were observed in T3. T2 had the highest flavor score and panelists did not like the texture of T4 which might be attributed to soft texture and mushiness associated with increasing poppy seed oil content. Similarly, Yıldız-Turp and Serdaroğlu (2008) reported reduced texture score for Turkish sucuk as amount of vegetable oil (hazelnut) increased. Reduced flavor scores with increased poppy seed oil amount in this study can be explained by undesirable odor of poppy seed oil. Except for flavor, panelists preferred T3 treatment to any other treatments.
Table 5.

Sensory properties of sucuk (n=3)*

TreatmentAppearanceTextureColorFlavorOverall acceptability
T18.1±0.467.5±0.387.7±0.347.7±0.357.85±0.54
T27.8±0.387.9±0.417.95±0.378.3±0.387.65±0.59
T38.3±0.488.3±0.438.3±0.467.55±0.408.35±0.62
T47.2±0.246.25±0.196.9±0.236.5±0.216.7±0.32
LSD**0.390.350.360.310.26

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat.

*Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations.

**LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number.

T1, Control 100% all animal fat; T2, 25% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/75% animal fat; T3, 50% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/50% animal fat; T4, 75% pre-emulsified poppy seed oil/25% animal fat. *Values are given as mean±standard deviation from triplicate determinations. **LSD, least significant difference (calculated at α=0.05); n, replication number.

Conclusion

Using pre-emulsified poppy seed oil as partial fat replacer in Turkish sucuk decreased cholesterol and saturated fatty acid content, but increased polyunsaturated fatty acids in this study. This finding may have implications for meat industry since reduced saturated fat and cholesterol content offer significant health benefits. Moreover, addition of poppy seed oil significantly increased polyunsaturated fatty acids/ saturated fatty acids ratio which will have additional potential health benefits including reduced blood pressure and decreased incidence of cardiac arrhythmias. In addition sensory analysis revealed acceptable results with poppy seed oil replacement. In closing, poppy seed oil as partial animal fat replacer in Turkish sucuk may have significant health benefits without sacrificing its quality characteristics.
  21 in total

1.  Role of dietary lipids in arteriosclerosis in experimental animals.

Authors:  K Imaizumi; Y Adan; K Shibata
Journal:  Biofactors       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Effect of replacing pork backfat with pre-emulsified olive oil on lipid fraction and sensory quality of Chorizo de Pamplona - a traditional Spanish fermented sausage.

Authors:  E Muguerza; O Gimeno; D Ansorena; J G Bloukas; I Astiasarán
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Effect of fat level and partial replacement of pork backfat with olive oil on processing and quality characteristics of fermented sausages.

Authors:  E Muguerza; G Fista; D Ansorena; I Astiasaran; J G Bloukas
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Effect of replacing pork backfat with olive oil on processing and quality characteristics of fermented sausages.

Authors:  J G Bloukas; E D Paneras; G C Fournitzis
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.209

5.  Effect of replacing beef fat with hazelnut oil on quality characteristics of sucuk - A Turkish fermented sausage.

Authors:  G Yıldız-Turp; M Serdaroğlu
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Utilization of interesterified oil blends in the production of frankfurters.

Authors:  Emin Burçin Ozvural; Halil Vural
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Effect of processing conditions on the quality of naturally fermented Turkish sausages (sucuks).

Authors:  Ayla Soyer; Ahmet Hamdi Ertaş; Ulkü Uzümcüogˇlu
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 8.  Omega-3 fatty acids in the prevention-management of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  A P Simopoulos
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.273

9.  Effects of replacing pork back fat with vegetable oils and rice bran fiber on the quality of reduced-fat frankfurters.

Authors:  Yun-Sang Choi; Ji-Hun Choi; Doo-Jeong Han; Hack-Youn Kim; Mi-Ai Lee; Jong-Youn Jeong; Hai-Jung Chung; Cheon-Jei Kim
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 10.  Dietary n-6 and n-3 fatty acid balance and cardiovascular health.

Authors:  Vasuki Wijendran; K C Hayes
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.848

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Critical Review on Nutritional, Bioactive, and Medicinal Potential of Spices and Herbs and Their Application in Food Fortification and Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Debopriya Mandal; Tanmay Sarkar; Runu Chakraborty
Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol       Date:  2022-10-11       Impact factor: 3.094

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.