| Literature DB >> 26761827 |
Young-Hee Cho1, Il-Seung Shin1, Sung-Moon Hong1, Cheol-Hyun Kim1.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to manufacture functional high protein fermented beverage, using whey protein concentrate (WPC) and Lactobacillus plantarum DK211 isolated from kimchi, and to evaluate the physicochemical, functional, and sensory properties of the resulting product. The fermented whey beverage (FWB) was formulated with whey protein concentrate 80 (WPC 80), skim milk powder, and sucrose; and fermented with Lactobacillus plantarum DK211 as single, or mixed with Lactococcus lactis R704, a commercial starter culture. The pH, titratable acidity, and viable cell counts during fermentation and storage were evaluated. It was found that the mixed culture showed faster acid development than the single culture. The resulting FWB had high protein (9%) and low fat content (0.2%). Increased viscosity, and antioxidant and antimicrobial activity were observed after fermentation. A viable cell count of 10(9) CFU/mL in FWB was achieved within 10 h fermentation, and it remained throughout storage at 15℃ for 28 d. Sensory analysis was also conducted, and compared to that of a commercial protein drink. The sensory scores of FWB were similar to those of the commercial protein drink in most attributes, except sourness. The sourness was highly related with the high lactic acid content produced during fermentation. The results showed that WPC and vegetable origin lactic acid bacteria isolated from kimchi might be used for the development of a high protein fermented beverage, with improved functionality and organoleptic properties.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacillus plantarum; antioxidant activity; fermented beverage; sensory analysis; whey protein
Year: 2015 PMID: 26761827 PMCID: PMC4682513 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2015.35.2.189
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
The composition of whey protein concentrate (WPC) and skim milk powder (SMP)
| Concentration (g/100 g powder) | ||
|---|---|---|
| WPC | SMP | |
| Protein | 80 | 35 |
| Fat | 0.1 | 52 |
| Lactose | 6.5 | 1.0 |
Fig. 1.Comparison of proteolytic activity of The plates were incubated at 37℃ for 24, 48 and 72 h.
Fig. 2.Changes in pH and titratable acidity of fermented whey beverage with ● : pH in mixed culture, ○ : pH in Lactobacillus plantarum DK 211, ■ : titratable acidity in mixed culture, □ : titratable acidity in Lactobacillus plantarum DK 211.
Fig. 3.Changes in viable cell counts of whey fermented beverage with Lactobacillus plantarum DK 211 (◇) and mixed culture (Lactobacillus plantarum DK 211+ Lactococcus lactis R704: ◆) during fermentation.
Antimicrobial activity of fermented whey beverage
| Test microorganisms | Clear zone (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFWB | FWB | FWB-LH 166 | FWB-ST Body1 | |
| 0 | 11 ± 0.5 | 11 ± 0.1 | 12 ± 0.3 | |
| 0 | 10.5 ± 0.5 | 10 ± 0.5 | 9.5 ± 0.2 | |
NFWB, non-fermented whey beverage; FWB, whey fermented beverage with mix culture (Lactobacillus plantarum DK 211+ Lactococcus lactis R704); FWB-LH 166, whey fermented beverage with Lactobacillus helveticus LH 166; FWB-ST Body1, whey fermented beverage with Streptococcus thermophilus ST-Body1.
All values are mean±SD of triplicates.
Fig. 4.Comparison in DPPH radical scavenging activity (A) and FRAP values (B) for non-fermented whey beverage, whey fermented beverage with Lactobacillus helveticus LH166, whey fermented beverage with Streptococcus thermophilus ST-Body1 and whey fermented beverage with mixed culture (Lactobacillus plantarum DK 211+ Lactococcus lactis R704), positive control: 0.01% Trolox.
Changes in viable cell counts of fermented whey beverage during storage
| Storage temp. (℃) | Viable cell counts (Log CFU/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 d | 7 d | 14 d | 28 d | |
| 4 | 9.62±0.05 | 9.60±0.03 | 9.57±0.10 | 9.59±0.09 |
| 10 | 9.67±0.06 | 9.41±0.11 | 9.48±0.04 | 9.49±0.05 |
| 15 | 9.60±0.08 | 9.46±0.10 | 9.60±0.05 | 9.45±0.10 |
All values are mean±SD of triplicates.
Fig. 5.Changes in pH and titratable acidity of whey fermented beverage during storage.
The chemical composition and physical property of non-fermented whey beverage (NFWB), fermented whey beverage (FWB) and commercial product (control)
| NFWB | FWB | Control | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein (%) | ND | 9.0 | 4.5 |
| Carbohydrate (%) | ND | 11.5 | 9.0 |
| Fat (%) | ND | 0.2 | 3.0 |
| Lactic acid (mg/mL) | 1.44 | 5.04 | 1.70 |
| Citric acid (mg/mL) | 0.48 | 1.44 | 1.41 |
| Viscosity (cp) | 7.20±0.1 | 33.6±0.1 | 9.6±0.2 |
ND, not detected.
The values for organic acid contents and viscosity are mean±SD of triplicates.
Mean panelist ratings for FWB and commercial product (control)
| Parameters | Samples | |
|---|---|---|
| FWB | Control | |
| Overall taste | 4.92a | 5.03a |
| Flavor | 5.50a | 5.16a |
| Freshness | 4.66a | 4.80a |
| Aftertaste | 4.83a | 4.93a |
| Off-flavor | 4.33a | 4.30a |
| Sourness | 4.14a | 2.83b |
| Sweetness | 3.80a | 3.77a |
FWB, Fermented whey beverage; control, a commercial brand, a banana flavored processed milk fortified with milk protein concentrate.
a,bmeans with different letters are significantly different (p<0.05).