| Literature DB >> 26761182 |
Byung Ki Kim1, Eun Gyeong Hwang2, Dae Jin Jung1, Jae Jung Ha1, Dong Yep Oh1, Chang Bon Choi3.
Abstract
The current study was conducted to identify technology for the production of high quality pork, based on the meat consumption habits of consumers. Macsumsuk, a type of kaolinite (a clay mineral), and/or a mixture of herbs (Mori Folium, Sophorae Radix, Glycyrrhizae Radix, Citri Leiocarpae Exocarpium, and Pogostemi Herba) were added to the diets of fattening pigs. Sixty barrow pigs (4 kinds of treatment × 5 pigs/treatment × 3 replicates) were randomly assigned to either the Control (no additives), T1 (3% Macsumsuk), T2 (3% Herb mixtures), or T3 (3% Macsumsuk + 3% Herb mixtures) groups, and were fed the diets for 60 d. Dressed weights were in the order of T1 (93.40±4.68kg) > T2 (91.40±6.52kg) > Control (88.80±1.57kg) > T3 (86.80±2.01kg). Back-fat thickness of the Control animals (23.2±1.03) was significantly greater than that of the various treatment groups (p<0.01). Numeric values representing the carcass yield and quality grade were higher for all the treated groups than the Control group, thought the difference was not statistically significant. Crude fat content was significantly higher in the Control group (2.23±0.34%) than in the treated groups (p<0.05). The addition of both Macsumsuk and herb mixtures into the diets of the pigs significantly reduced cooking loss of the pork compared to the Control (p<0.05). No statistically significant changes were observed in the shear force (average 5.87±0.54 kg/cm(2)), water holding capacity (average 54.59±3.16%), or CIE values of the pork, whereas cholesterol levels significantly decreased (p<0.01) in those fed Macsumsuk and/or the herb mixtures. No significant changes in fatty acid composition, total saturated fatty acid (SFA), total unsaturated fatty acid (UFA), or UFA/SFA ratios were observed by any of the treatments. In conclusion, the results obtained from this study suggest that the addition of Macsumsuk and/or herb mixtures into the diets of growing and fattening pigs improves the pork quality by reducing cooking loss, decreasing cholesterol content, and enhancing sensory characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Macsumsuk; herb mixtures; pigs; quality grade; yield grade
Year: 2014 PMID: 26761182 PMCID: PMC4597864 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.3.395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets
| Ingredient (%) | Growing (50-80 kg) | Fattening (80-120 kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Corn | 45.52 | 42.12 |
| Wheat | 13.00 | 13.00 |
| Lupin | 2.50 | 2.50 |
| Rice bran | 4.00 | 8.80 |
| Soybean meal | 19.85 | 17.40 |
| Rapeseed meal | 2.44 | 4.58 |
| Sesame meal | 3.00 | 2.00 |
| Limestone | 0.61 | 0.61 |
| Calcium phosphate | 0.77 | 0.75 |
| Salt | 0.31 | 0.31 |
| Tallow | 4.52 | 4.52 |
| Molasses | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| L-lysine, 98% | 0.14 | 0.14 |
| Vitamin primix1) | 0.15 | 0.11 |
| Mineral primix2) | 0.15 | 0.12 |
| Choline chloride, 50% | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Total | 100 | 100 |
| Chemical composition (%) | ||
| Moisture | 9.99 | 10.42 |
| Crude protein | 18.12 | 15.54 |
| Crude fat | 4.90 | 4.30 |
| Crude fiber | 6.13 | 6.83 |
| Crude ash | 8.25 | 8.21 |
| Ca | 0.58 | 0.46 |
| P | 1.30 | 1.30 |
| ME (kcal/kg) | 3,350 | 3,300 |
1)Vitamin premix: 12,000,000 IU vitamin A, 2,400,000,000 IU vitamin D3, 1,500 mg vitamin E, 2,500 mg vitamin B1, 4,000 mg vitamin B2, 2,000 mg vitamin B6, 20 mg vitamin B12, 12,000 mg pantothenic acid, 40,000 mg niacin, 30 mg biotin, 1,000 mg folic acid, and 6,000 mg antioxidant.
2)Mineral premix: 8,000 mg Cu, 50,000 mg Fe, 70,000 mg Mn, 200 mg Se, and 50,000 mg Zn.
Chemical composition of Macsumsuk and the herb mixture used in this study
| Chemical composition (%) | Macsumsuk | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 0.75 | 8.50 | 7.00 | 6.10 | 11.10 | 8.57 |
| Crude protein | 0.24 | 14.81 | 11.35 | 9.36 | 5.09 | 6.78 |
| Crude fat | 0.24 | 5.67 | 2.19 | 3.37 | 3.36 | 2.76 |
| Crude fiber | - | 53.49 | 20.46 | 13.96 | 9.47 | 31.40 |
| Crude ash | - | 12.57 | 4.72 | 7.13 | 2.21 | 6.82 |
Estimation data
Effects of Macsumsuk and the herb mixture on pig carcass traits
| Items | Control1) | T12) | T23) | T34) | Average | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial weight (kg) | 58.20±8.20 | 57.60±7.40 | 58.10±7.50 | 57.60±9.10 | 57.88±7.29 | - | - |
| Final weight (kg) | 120.50a±4.40 | 120.70a±4.50 | 126.90b±3.50 | 126.40b±4.60 | 124.63±3.80 | 8.544 | 0.003 |
| Feed intake / day (kg) | 3.03±0.17 | 2.91±0.07 | 2.98±0.11 | 2.98±0.11 | 2.98±0.12 | 0.675 | 0.584 |
| Feed conversion rate | 2.92b±0.11 | 2.62a±0.11 | 2.65a±0.07 | 2.65a±0.07 | 2.71±0.15 | 9.839 | 0.041 |
| Dressing weight (kg) | 88.80±1.57 | 93.40±4.68 | 91.40±6.52 | 86.80±2.01 | 91.25±4.12 | 0.787 | 0.524 |
| Dressing percent (%) | 73.69±1.27 | 74.89±4.89 | 72.03±5.36 | 74.74±1.44 | 73.16±3.58 | 0.553 | 0.656 |
| Back-fat thickness (cm) | 23.20b±1.03 | 19.60a±1.36 | 18.41a±4.20 | 19.20a±0.46 | 19.91a±2.87 | 3.961 | 0.036 |
| Yield grade5) | 3.60±0.49 | 3.80±0.80 | 3.76±0.21 | 3.80±0.21 | 3.73±0.45 | 0.131 | 0.940 |
| Quality grade6) | 2.70±0.29 | 2.90±0.18 | 2.94±0.51 | 2.94±0.10 | 2.87±0.30 | 0.538 | 0.665 |
Data are presented as the mean±SD
a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).
1)Control: basal concentrate, 2)T1: 0.3% Macsumsuk powder, 3)T2: 0.3% herb mixture, 4)T3: 0.3% Macsumsuk powder+0.3% herb mixture, 5)Converted into numeric values: A=4, B=3, C=2, and D=1, 6)Converted into numeric values: 1+=4, 1=3, 2=2, 3=1
Effects of Macsumsuk and the herb mixture on pork chemical composition
| Items(%) | Control1) | T12) | T23) | T34) | Average | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture | 73.81±0.82 | 74.08±0.17 | 74.14±0.24 | 73.49±1.01 | 73.88±0.65 | 0.789 | 0.523 |
| Crude protein | 23.15±0.77 | 22.60±0.40 | 22.80±0.61 | 22.87±1.02 | 22.85±0.69 | 0.383 | 0.767 |
| Crude fat | 2.23b±0.34 | 1.84a±0.08 | 1.97ab±1.00 | 1.78a±0.12 | 1.96±0.25 | 4.439 | 0.026 |
| Crude ash | 0.82±0.04 | 0.78±0.13 | 0.80±0.23 | 0.88±0.05 | 0.82±0.05 | 4.716 | 0.021 |
Data are presented as the mean±SD.
a,bMeans with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).
1)Control: basal concentrate, 2)T1: 0.3% Macsumsuk powder, 3)T2: 0.3% herb mixture, and 4)T3: 0.3% Macsumsuk powder + 0.3% herb mixture
Effects of supplementation with Macsumsuk and herb powders on the physicochemical properties of pork from growing- finishing pigs
| Items(%) | Control1) | T12) | T23) | T34) | Average | F-value | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cooking loss (%) | 35.63b±0.43 | 33.07a±0.98 | 34.17a±0.60 | 34.17a±0.63 | 34.26±1.12 | 9.277 | 0.012 | |
| Shear force value (kg/cm2) | 6.19±0.86 | 5.53±0.53 | 5.88±0.32 | 5.88±0.19 | 5.87±0.54 | 1.013 | 0.421 | |
| Water holding capacity (%) | 53.98±0.82 | 54.65±4.00 | 54.88±3.50 | 54.88±4.52 | 54.59±3.16 | 0.059 | 0.980 | |
| Cholesterol content (mg/100g) | 42.03C±0.78 | 36.15B±1.58 | 34.10A±0.96 | 34.10A±1.18 | 36.59±3.51 | 41.524 | 0.004 | |
| CIE5) | L* | 54.24±0.95 | 54.23±1.50 | 55.23±2.07 | 55.20±1.56 | 54.72±1.49 | 0.676 | 0.676 |
| a* | 9.42±0.80 | 10.05±1.05 | 10.11±0.62 | 10.11±0.92 | 9.92±0.83 | 0.617 | 0.617 | |
| b* | 3.52±0.34 | 3.58±0.33 | 3.51±0.25 | 3.51±0.21 | 3.53±0.26 | 0.984 | 0.984 | |
| pH | 5.80±0.37 | 5.80±0.37 | 5.87±0.10 | 5.89±0.32 | 5.89±0.63 | 0.042 | 0.988 | |
| Sensory evaluation | Juiciness | 4.32±0.46 | 4.50±0.14 | 4.56±0.79 | 4.56±0.51 | 4.48±0.48 | 0.901 | 0.901 |
| Tenderness | 3.82±0.13 | 4.14±0.29 | 4.20±0.54 | 4.20±0.29 | 4.09±0.35 | 0.384 | 0.384 | |
| Flavor | 4.20C±0.78 | 3.61B±1.58 | 3.41A±0.96 | 3.41A±0.18 | 3.65±0.51 | 0.005 | 0.005 | |
Data are presented as the mean±SD.
a-cMeans with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).
A-CMeans with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.01).
1)Control: basal concentrate, 2)T1: 0.3% Macsumsuk powder, 3)T2: 0.3% herb mixture, and 4)T3: 0.3% Macsumsuk powder + 0.3% herb mixture, 5)CIE values: L*=lightness, a*=redness, and b*=yellowness
Effects of Macsumsuk and the herb mixture on the fatty acid composition of pork
| Items(%) | Control1) | T12) | T23) | T34) | Average | F-value | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C14:0 | 1.18±0.15 | 1.22±0.12 | 1.20±0.27 | 1.20±0.14 | 1.20±0.16 | 0.032 | 0.992 |
| C16:0 | 23.99±1.41 | 23.58±1.07 | 23.19±0.83 | 23.19±1.64 | 23.49±1.19 | 0.362 | 0.781 |
| C16:1n7 | 2.75±0.21 | 2.76±0.25 | 2.99±0.35 | 3.04±0.39 | 2.89±0.31 | 0.959 | 0.443 |
| C18:0 | 13.10±1.42 | 12.47±1.79 | 12.90±0.49 | 12.85±0.78 | 12.83±1.12 | 0.183 | 0.906 |
| C18:1n9 | 43.45±1.22 | 45.72±0.99 | 45.01±1.36 | 45.15±1.83 | 44.83±1.51 | 1.977 | 0.171 |
| C18:1n7 | 2.55±0.21 | 2.35±0.25 | 2.47±0.87 | 2.42±0.08 | 2.45±0.42 | 0.135 | 0.937 |
| C18:2n6 | 11.02±0.76 | 10.23±0.66 | 10.41±1.61 | 10.31±0.22 | 10.49±0.91 | 0.565 | 0.649 |
| C18:3n6 | 0.05±0.04 | 0.06±0.02 | 0.05±0.02 | 0.05±0.01 | 0.05±0.02 | 0.144 | 0.932 |
| C18:3n3 | 0.47±0.07 | 0.43±0.02 | 0.44±0.02 | .044±0.02 | 0.45±0.04 | 0.882 | 0.478 |
| C20:1n9 | 0.97±0.09 | 0.96±0.10 | 0.90±0.09 | 0.90±0.15 | 0.93±0.10 | 0.472 | 0.707 |
| C20:4n6 | 0.51±0.06 | 0.55±0.06 | 0.54±0.06 | 0.54±0.03 | 0.54±0.05 | 0.438 | 0.730 |
| Total | 100.04±0.02 | 100.33±0.33 | 100.09±0.10 | 100.08±0.01 | 100.14±0.19 | 2.377 | 0.121 |
| SFA5) | 38.27±0.31 | 37.27±0.85 | 37.29±0.23 | 37.23±1.50 | 37.51±0.91 | 1.296 | 0.321 |
| UFA6) | 61.73±0.31 | 62.73±0.85 | 62.72±0.23 | 62.77±1.50 | 62.49±0.91 | 1.296 | 0.321 |
| MUFA7) | 49.73±1.10 | 51.80±1.34 | 51.36±1.69 | 51.51±1.59 | 51.10±1.54 | 1.665 | 0.227 |
| PUPA8) | 12.01±0.86 | 10.94±0.51 | 11.35±1.58 | 11.26±0.25 | 11.39±0.93 | 0.908 | 0.466 |
| UFA/SFA9) | 1.61±0.02 | 1.69±0.06 | 1.68±0.02 | 1.69±0.11 | 1.67±0.07 | 1.397 | 0.291 |
Data are presented as the mean±SD.
a-cMeans with different superscripts in the same row are significantly different (p<0.05).
1)Control: basal concentrate, 2)T1: 0.3% Macsumsuk powder, 3)T2: 0.3% herb mixture, and 4)T3: 0.3% Macsumsuk powder + 0.3% herb mixture, 5)SFA: saturated fatty acid (C14+C16+C18), 6)UFA: unsaturated fatty acids, 7)MUFA: monounsaturated fatty acids,8)PUFA: polyunsaturated fatty acids, and 9)UFA/SFA: unsaturated fatty acids / saturated fatty acids.