| Literature DB >> 26761167 |
Sun Moon Kang1, Geunho Kang1, Pilnam Seong1, Beomyoung Park1, Soohyun Cho1.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of the packaging method on the lipid and protein oxidation, and color in aged top round from Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) for 14 d at 4℃. Catalase activity was the highest (p<0.05) in vacuum packaging (VP) treatment during storage, and was higher (p<0.05) in 50% Ox-MAP and 50% Ox-MAP+vacuum skin packaging (VSP) treatments than in other treatments at d 14. Superoxide dismutase activity was higher (p<0.05) in VP, 50% Ox-MAP, and 50% Ox-MAP+VSP treatments than in other treatments at d 14. During storage, total antioxidant activity was the highest (p<0.05) in VP treatment and was higher (p<0.05) in 50% Ox-MAP+VSP treatment than in 80% Ox-MAP treatment. TBARS value was the lowest (p<0.05) in VP treatment during storage and was lower (p<0.05) in 50% Ox-MAP and Ox-MAP+VSP treatments than in 80% Ox-MAP and Ox-MAP treatments, respectively. Carbonyl content was the lowest (p<0.05) in VP treatment from 10 d. From 7 d, the a* value was the highest (p<0.05) in VP treatment and was higher (p<0.05) in 50% Ox-MAP and 50% Ox-MAP+VSP treatments than in other treatments. The b* value was the highest (p<0.05) in VP treatment from 3 d, and was higher (p<0.05) in 80% Ox-MAP+VSP, 50% Ox-MAP, and 50% Ox-MAP+ VSP treatments than in 80% Ox-MAP treatment at d 14. Therefore, VP improved the oxidation and red color stabilities in stored-aged top round compared with Ox-MAP. In addition, 50% Ox-MAP improved the lipid oxidation and red color stabilities compared with 80% Ox-MAP, and its inhibitory effect on lipid oxidation was enhanced by combination with VSP.Entities:
Keywords: aged; color; lipid oxidation; packaging method; protein oxidation; top round
Year: 2014 PMID: 26761167 PMCID: PMC4597862 DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.3.273
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour ISSN: 1225-8563 Impact factor: 2.622
Effect of packaging method on the antioxidant enzyme activity in aged top round from Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) during storage at 4℃
| Items | Storage time (d) | VP | 80% Ox-MAP | 80% Ox-MAP+VSP | 50% Ox-MAP | 50% Ox-MAP+VSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Catalase (Units/g meat) | 1 | 129.49±14.04a | 91.94±8.90b | 99.02±18.88b | 105.51±10.30b | 101.57±3.96b |
| 7 | 114.89±16.86a | 87.23±6.87b | 86.74±6.46b | 84.15±22.45b | 85.96±18.22b | |
| 14 | 127.71±8.53a | 70.35±15.37c | 81.33±7.32c | 93.70±6.57b | 97.87±9.56b | |
| GSH-Px (Units/g meat) | 1 | 2.13±0.20 | 1.98±0.41 | 2.22±0.18 | 2.14±0.33 | 2.28±0.22 |
| 7 | 2.33±0.24 | 2.16±0.49 | 2.30±0.14 | 2.11±0.40 | 2.01±0.42 | |
| 14 | 2.39±0.50 | 2.05±0.53 | 2.29±0.45 | 2.42±0.46 | 2.38±0.51 | |
| SOD (Units/g meat) | 1 | 114.46±10.43 | 105.07±15.27 | 118.47±3.97 | 114.80±9.16 | 112.24±5.80 |
| 7 | 156.46±5.34 | 135.07±13.21 | 139.39±14.27 | 147.55±6.84 | 149.08±11.68 | |
| 14 | 120.61±6.30a | 101.19±7.06b | 110.20±10.09b | 123.74±11.35a | 120.95±5.84a | |
a-cMeans±S.D. in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05)
Fig. 1.Effect of packaging method on the total antioxidant activity (TAA) in aged top round from Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) during storage at 4℃. Values are means± S.D. a-cDifferent letters indicate significant differences among packaging methods within the same storage time (p<0.05).
Fig. 2.Effect of packaging method on the TBARS value in aged top round from Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) during storage at 4℃. Values are means±S.D.
Fig. 3.Effect of packaging method on the carbonyl content in aged top round from Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) during storage at 4℃. Values are means±S.D.
Effect of packaging method on the surface color in aged top round from Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) during storage at 4℃
| Items | Storage time (d) | VP | 80% Ox-MAP | 80% Ox-MAP+VSP | 50% Ox-MAP | 50% Ox-MAP+VSP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | 1 | 42.66±3.68 | 44.93±1.68 | 44.77±3.14 | 43.97±1.35 | 43.28±1.94 |
| 3 | 43.72±1.90 | 43.89±2.00 | 43.48±1.47 | 42.49±1.36 | 43.04±2.11 | |
| 7 | 43.38±2.79 | 43.46±1.82 | 45.16±3.49 | 46.48±3.84 | 43.18±2.30 | |
| 10 | 39.79±1.73c | 45.26±2.20a | 42.91±1.68b | 43.51±1.93b | 42.94±1.60b | |
| 14 | 44.04±2.28 | 45.75±2.06 | 44.98±2.80 | 45.48±3.34 | 45.60±2.72 | |
| a* | 1 | 24.86±0.79 | 24.28±1.64 | 23.55±2.07 | 23.01±2.55 | 24.04±1.03 |
| 3 | 23.41±1.97b | 24.20±1.21a | 24.48±1.22a | 24.80±2.25a | 24.70±1.29a | |
| 7 | 24.39±2.65a | 21.47±1.53c | 21.31±2.37c | 23.02±1.94b | 22.14±1.87b | |
| 10 | 24.48±1.15a | 17.90±1.60c | 18.22±1.21c | 19.05±1.98b | 19.36±1.85b | |
| 14 | 22.16±4.80a | 13.23±2.79c | 13.36±1.25c | 14.49±1.66b | 14.85±1.69b | |
| b* | 1 | 11.42±0.73b | 10.57±1.27c | 10.19±0.98c | 10.06±1.45c | 12.37±0.65a |
| 3 | 11.06±1.65a | 10.08±0.68b | 10.40±0.78b | 10.41±1.39b | 10.98±0.64b | |
| 7 | 11.72±1.45a | 8.94±0.90d | 9.65±0.66c | 10.32±0.91b | 9.63±0.97c | |
| 10 | 10.91±0.71a | 7.94±0.68b | 8.18±0.88b | 7.71±0.55b | 7.90±0.89b | |
| 14 | 11.42±0.85a | 6.87±0.69c | 7.42±1.49b | 7.58±1.26b | 7.75±1.25b | |
a-cMeans±S.D. in the same row with different superscripts differ significantly (p<0.05)