Literature DB >> 26760604

Balloon catheter versus basket catheter for endoscopic bile duct stone extraction: a multicenter randomized trial.

Hirotoshi Ishiwatari1, Hiroshi Kawakami2, Hiroyuki Hisai3, Kei Yane4, Manabu Onodera5, Kazunori Eto6, Shin Haba7, Toshinori Okuda8, Hideyuki Ihara9, Takehiro Kukitsu10, Ryusuke Matsumoto11, Keisuke Kitaoka12, Tomoko Sonoda13, Tsuyoshi Hayashi1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Endoscopic bile duct stone (BDS) removal is a well-established treatment; however, the preference for basket or balloon catheters for extraction is operator-dependent. We therefore conducted a multicenter prospective randomized trial to compare catheter performance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled patients with a BDS diameter ≤ 10 mm and common bile duct diameter ≤ 15 mm. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that were treated with basket or balloon catheters between October 2013 and September 2014. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete clearance of the duct; the secondary endpoints were the rate and time to complete clearance in one endoscopic session.
RESULTS: We initially enrolled 172 consecutive patients; 14 were excluded after randomization. The complete clearance rates were 92.3 % (72/78) in the balloon group and 80.0 % (64 /80) in the basket group. The difference in the rates between the two groups was 12.3 percentage points, indicating non-inferiority of the balloon method (non-inferiority limit -10 %; P < 0.001 for non-inferiority). Moreover, the balloon was superior to the basket (P = 0.037). The rate of complete clearance in one endoscopic session was 97.4 % using the balloon and 97.5 % using the basket (P = 1.00). The median times to complete clearance in one endoscopic session were 6.0 minutes (1 - 30) and 7.8 minutes (1 - 37) in the balloon and basket groups, respectively (P = 0.15).
CONCLUSIONS: For extraction of BDSs ≤ 10 mm, complete endoscopic treatment with a single catheter is more likely when choosing a balloon catheter over a basket catheter.University Hospital Medical Information Network Trials Registry: UMIN000011887. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26760604     DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1569573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  6 in total

1.  Prospective randomized study of endoscopic biliary stone extraction using either a basket or a balloon catheter: the BasketBall study.

Authors:  Noritaka Ozawa; Ichiro Yasuda; Shinpei Doi; Takuji Iwashita; Masahito Shimizu; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Masanori Nakashima; Tesshin Ban; Issei Kojima; Koichiro Matsuda; Mitsuru Matsuda; Yusuke Ishida; Yoshinobu Okabe; Nobuhiro Ando; Keisuke Iwata
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 7.527

2.  A feasibility study of digital single-operator cholangioscopy for diagnostic and therapeutic procedure (with videos).

Authors:  Miyuki Imanishi; Takeshi Ogura; Yoshitaka Kurisu; Saori Onda; Wataru Takagi; Atsushi Okuda; Akira Miyano; Mio Amano; Nobu Nishioka; Daisuke Masuda; Kazuhide Higuchi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Application and usefulness of a new eight-wire basket catheter for endoscopic extraction of small common bile duct stones: A retrospective multicenter study.

Authors:  Osamu Inatomi; Masanobu Katayama; Koichi Soga; Takashi Yamamoto; Takao Mikami; Yukihiro Morita; Jun Nakajima; Shuhei Shintani; Yuki Yagi; Yuki Kishi; Kazuyoshi Matsumura
Journal:  DEN open       Date:  2022-06-05

4.  The Incidence of Complications in Single-stage Endoscopic Stone Removal for Patients with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Propensity Score Analysis.

Authors:  Hirokazu Saito; Yoshihiro Kadono; Kentaro Kamikawa; Atsushi Urata; Haruo Imamura; Ikuo Matsushita; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Shuji Tada
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 1.271

5.  Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in single-stage endoscopic common bile duct stone removal.

Authors:  Hirokazu Saito; Takehiko Koga; Masafumi Sakaguchi; Yoshihiro Kadono; Kentaro Kamikawa; Atsushi Urata; Haruo Imamura; Shuji Tada; Tatsuyuki Kakuma; Ikuo Matsushita
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2019-10-15

Review 6.  Difficult Biliary Stones: A Comprehensive Review of New and Old Lithotripsy Techniques.

Authors:  Edoardo Troncone; Michelangela Mossa; Pasquale De Vico; Giovanni Monteleone; Giovanna Del Vecchio Blanco
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 2.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.