Literature DB >> 26760587

Review of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients who require a liver transplant.

Elena Villacastín Ruiz1, Agustín Caro-Patón Gómez, Hermógenes Calero Aguilar, Baltasar Pérez Saborido, Félix García Pajares, Gloria Sánchez Antolín, Beatriz Madrigal Rubiales, David Pacheco Sánchez, Rebeca Pintado Garrido, Sara Plaza Loma, Trinidad Escudero Caro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to retrospectively compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasound (US), contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and contrast-enhanced MRI in cirrhotic patients who were candidates for liver transplantation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 273 consecutive patients with 218 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) nodules, who underwent imaging and subsequent transplantation, were examined. Diagnosis of HCC was based on explant correlation of the whole liver. Three different imaging data sets were evaluated: US, MDCT and MRI unenhanced and dynamic phases. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value, with corresponding 95% confidence intervals, were determined. Statistical analysis was performed for all lesions and for two lesion subgroups (≤2 and >2 cm). Preoperative tumour staging was analysed.
RESULTS: Patient sensitivity to US, MDCT and MRI was 80.4, 81.1 and 90.5%, respectively. Specificity was 96.3, 96.2 and 82.1%. Combined US and MDCT improved sensitivity (88%) without significant loss in specificity (95.7%). Imaging tests resulted in accurate tumour staging in 83.4% of the patients. In per-nodule analysis, technique sensitivity was 55.6, 52.4 and 65.9%, respectively. Sensitivity figures improved when the nodule was larger than 2 cm.
CONCLUSION: Combining imaging techniques is a good strategy for pretransplant HCC diagnosis and provides more accurate cancer staging in patients, which is necessary to decide the correct therapeutic approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26760587     DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000000528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0954-691X            Impact factor:   2.566


  5 in total

Review 1.  Computed tomography for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Tin Nadarevic; Vanja Giljaca; Agostino Colli; Mirella Fraquelli; Giovanni Casazza; Damir Miletic; Davor Štimac
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Tin Nadarevic; Agostino Colli; Vanja Giljaca; Mirella Fraquelli; Giovanni Casazza; Cristina Manzotti; Davor Štimac; Damir Miletic
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-06

3.  Abdominal ultrasound and alpha-foetoprotein for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in adults with chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Agostino Colli; Tin Nadarevic; Damir Miletic; Vanja Giljaca; Mirella Fraquelli; Davor Štimac; Giovanni Casazza
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-04-15

4.  Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017).

Authors:  Ying Ding; Sheng-Xiang Rao; Wen-Tao Wang; Cai-Zhong Chen; Ren-Chen Li; Mengsu Zeng
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Accuracy of Pretransplant Imaging Diagnostic for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective German Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Uta Herden; Wenzel Schoening; Johann Pratschke; Steffen Manekeller; Andreas Paul; Richard Linke; Thomas Lorf; Frank Lehner; Felix Braun; Dirk L Stippel; Robert Sucher; Hartmut Schmidt; Christian P Strassburg; Markus Guba; Marieke van Rosmalen; Xavier Rogiers; Undine Samuel; Gerhard MSc Schön; Bjoern Nashan
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-03-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.