Literature DB >> 26760492

Reporting Diagnostic Scores in Educational Testing: Temptations, Pitfalls, and Some Solutions.

Sandip Sinharay1, Gautam Puhan1, Shelby J Haberman1.   

Abstract

Diagnostic scores are of increasing interest in educational testing due to their potential remedial and instructional benefit. Naturally, the number of educational tests that report diagnostic scores is on the rise, as are the number of research publications on such scores. This article provides a critical evaluation of diagnostic score reporting in educational testing. The existing methods for diagnostic score reporting are discussed. A recent method ( Haberman, 2008a ) that examines if diagnostic scores are worth reporting is reviewed. It is demonstrated, using results from operational and simulated data, that diagnostic scores have to be based on a sufficient number of items and have to be sufficiently distinct from each other to be worth reporting and that several operationally reported subscores are actually not worth reporting. Several recommendations are made for those interested to report diagnostic scores for educational tests.

Year:  2010        PMID: 26760492     DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2010.483382

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res        ISSN: 0027-3171            Impact factor:   5.923


  3 in total

Review 1.  Development of diagnostic score reporting for a dental hygiene structured clinical assessment.

Authors:  Alix Clarke; Hollis Lai; Alexandra DE Sheppard; Minn N Yoon
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2021-02-15

2.  Effect of diagnostic score reporting following a structured clinical assessment of dental hygiene student performance.

Authors:  Alix Clarke; Hollis Lai; Alexandra DE Sheppard; Minn N Yoon
Journal:  Can J Dent Hyg       Date:  2021-02-15

3.  Classification Accuracy of Mixed Format Tests: A Bi-Factor Item Response Theory Approach.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Fritz Drasgow; Liwen Liu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.