Literature DB >> 26759939

Rating of perceived exertion in maximal incremental tests during head-out water-based aerobic exercises.

Cristine Lima Alberton1, Stephanie Santana Pinto1, Tatiane Gorski2,3, Amanda Haberland Antunes4, Paula Finatto4, Eduardo Lusa Cadore4, Marco Bergamin5, Luiz Fernando Martins Kruel4.   

Abstract

The present study aimed to assess the relationship between rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and percentage of peak oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]) during three head-out water-based aerobic exercises. In addition, the RPE at the second ventilatory threshold (VT2) was also compared among them. Twenty young women performed head-out water-based maximal tests for the exercises stationary running (SR), frontal kick (FK) and cross-country skiing (CCS). RPE was monitored during the tests and the values corresponding to VT2 and training zones corresponding to 50-59%, 60-69%, 70-79%, 80-89% and [Formula: see text] were determined. Regression analysis, descriptive statistics and ANOVA with repeated measures were used. Significant relationships were observed between the RPE and [Formula: see text] (r = 0.858-0.893; P < 0.001) for all head-out water-based aerobic exercises. Average RPE ranged from 12.1-12.7 in the training zone corresponding to 50-59%, from 13.7-14.8 to 60-69%, from 15.8-16.4 to 70-79%, from 17.3-18.1 to 80-89% and from 18.5-18.9 to [Formula: see text]. No significant differences were found among the three head-out water-based aerobic exercises at VT2 (P > 0.05; SR: 16.1 ± 0.9, FK: 16.7 ± 1.5, CCS: 15.9 ± 1.3). The results support the use of RPE to control the relative intensity of training during head-out water-based aerobic exercises and indicate values near to 16-17 when targeting VT2 intensity for young women.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic exercises; oxygen uptake; perceived effort; ventilatory threshold

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26759939     DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1134804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  6 in total

1.  Discussion of "Concurrent and Construct Validation of a Scale for Rating Perceived Exertion in Aquatic Cycling for Young Men".

Authors:  Mauricio Garzon; Alain Steve Comtois
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Cardiorespiratory Parameters Comparison Between Incremental Protocols Performed in Aquatic and Land Environments by Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Luana S Andrade; Cíntia E Botton; Gabriela B David; Stephanie S Pinto; Mariana S Häfele; Cristine L Alberton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  Concurrent and Construct Validation of a Scale for Rating Perceived Exertion in Aquatic Cycling for Young Men.

Authors:  Juan C Colado; Roxana M Brasil
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 2.988

4.  Ratings of Perceived Exertion Misclassify Intensities for Sedentary Older Adults During Graded Cycling Test: Effect of Supramaximal High-Intensity Interval Training.

Authors:  Georges Jabbour; Lina Majed
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Relationship between Oxygen Uptake, Heart Rate, and Perceived Effort in an Aquatic Incremental Test in Older Women.

Authors:  Luana Siqueira Andrade; Ana Carolina Kanitz; Mariana Silva Häfele; Gustavo Zaccaria Schaun; Stephanie Santana Pinto; Cristine Lima Alberton
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Head-Out Water-Based Protocols to Assess Cardiorespiratory Fitness-Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Ogonowska-Slodownik; Paula Richley Geigle; Natalia Morgulec-Adamowicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.