Literature DB >> 26759827

Quantification of gene-specific methylation of DNMT3B and MTHFR using sequenom EpiTYPER®.

Vikki Ho1, Janet E Ashbury1, Sherryl Taylor2, Stephen Vanner3, Will D King1.   

Abstract

Among 272 patients undergoing a screening colonoscopy, DNA methylation of DNMT3B and MTHFR, genes encoding enzymes critical to one-carbon metabolism, was quantified in blood leukocytes using Sequenom EpiTYPER®. DNA methylation was quantified in 66 and 28 CpG sites of DNMT3B and MTHFR respectively, and conceptualized using two approaches. First, measures representing average methylation across all CpG sites were created. Second, unsupervised principal component (PC) analysis was used as a pattern derivation and data-reduction approach, to develop two summary variables (PC1 and PC2). These two summary variables represented methylation around the transcription start site (PC1) and in the gene-coding area (PC2) for both DNMT3B and MTHFR. The data contained in this article presents the variation of methylation levels for individual CpG sites within the DNMT3B and MTHFR genes and possible correlations uncovered using PC analysis. The data are related to the research article "Gene-specific DNA methylation of DNMT3B and MTHFR and colorectal adenoma risk" in Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26759827      PMCID: PMC4683340          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2015.11.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table

Value of the data

Using the Sequenom EpiTYPER® technology, we quantified methylation levels of 66 and 28 CpG sites located within the promoter regions of DNMT3B and MTHFR, respectively; methylation levels of these CpG sites were highly variable. Future etiological studies investigating the role of gene-specific DNA methylation in DNMT3B and MTHFR could explore different conceptualizations of methylation including principal component analysis. The methodology used in processing raw data values for methylation levels quantified using the Sequenom EpiTYPER® technology could be used as a benchmark for future research. The data derived from our study can be used to inform future investigations relating methylation levels within specific CpG sites to gene expression for DNMT3B and MTHFR.

Data

DNA methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B: NM_006892.3) and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR; NM_005957.4) are two key genes which encode enzymes critical to 1C metabolism, disruption of which has increasingly been implicated in colorectal cancer etiology [1], [2]. DNA methylation involves the covalent addition of a methyl group to cytosine residues that precede guanine (CpG) and is the most commonly studied epigenetic process [3]. In the present work, among 272 patients undergoing a screening colonoscopy, we present the data of leukocytic methylation levels quantified using the Sequenom EpiTYPER® technology for 66 and 28 CpG sites in the DNMT3B and MTHFR genes, respectively. The data are related to the research article “Gene-specific DNA methylation of DNMT3B and MTHFR and colorectal adenoma risk” in Mutation Research – Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis [4].

Experimental design, materials and methods

Overview of study design

Among the 330 patients, aged 40–65, undergoing a screening colonoscopy at Hotel Dieu Hospital in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 272 participants were selected for this research as they met the minimum blood leukocyte DNA concentration required for DNA methylation analysis. Ninety participants were diagnosed with one or more pathologically-confirmed tubular, tubullo-villous or villous adenoma(s) while 182 patients had no abnormality identified during colonoscopy. At the colonoscopy visit, a fasting blood sample was collected in a 10 ml ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid vacutainer. The vacutainer was placed immediately on ice and blood was centrifuged within 45 min; the buffy layer (blood leukocytes) was removed and stored at −20 °C. DNA was isolated from blood leukocytes and purified using the 5-PRIME DNA isolation kit (Inter Medico, Markham, ON, Canada). DNA concentrations were quantified using Quant-iT™ PicoGreen®, and DNA was stored at −20 °C until methylation analysis.

Quantification of gene-specific DNA methylation

DNA methylation of DNMT3B and MTHFR genes was quantified in stored leukocytic DNA using the Sequenom EpiTYPER® technology. EpiTYPER® uses base-specific cleavage and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry to quantify DNA methylation [5], [6], [7]. This validated and reproducible method enables a highly precise and quantitative measurement of methylation at multiple CpG sites within large promoter regions of genes [6], [7]. Methylation analysis was carried out at the McGill University and Génome Quebec Innovation Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Using Sequenom’s EpiDesignerTM software, PCR primers were designed for the two genes of interest (Table 1). Specifically, the genomic region of interest for DNMT3B spanned 1977 base pairs (GRCh37/hg19: chr20: 31349361-31351338, positive strand) and was chosen from the promoter region based on the reported location of a CpG island and literature showing variability between cancer cell lines [8], [9], [10]. The region of interest for MTHFR spanned 2115 base pairs (GRCh37/hg19: chr1:11866473-11864358, negative strand) and included coverage over the promoter region and CpG island; as well, CpG sites located apart from the island approximately 1000 base pairs from the promoter region were also targeted [10], [11], [12], [13], [14].
Table 1

Primer sequences for quantification of DNA methylation of DNMT3B and MTHFR genes using Sequenom EpiTYPER®. Upper case letters are used to denote the gene specific sequence in each primer shown.

GeneFragmentRegionPrimer sequences
Forward 5′–3′Reverse 5′–3′
DNMT3b1chr20:31349428 to 31349886aggaagagagTTGAGTATTTATTGAGATTTTGTTTcagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctCAAACTCCTTCTAAAACCTTTTTCC
2chr20:31349921to 31350352aggaagagagGGAAAAAGGTTTTAGAAGGAGTTTGcagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctTTTACTTAAACCACTTAACCCCAAC
3chr20:31350385 to 31350876aggaagagagGTTGGGGTTAAGTGGTTTAAGTAcagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctCCTTAACTTTTCCCAAAACAAAAAC
4chr20:31350991 to 31351263aggaagagagGTTTTTGTTTTGGGAAAAGTTAAGGcagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctCTAAAAATAAAAAATAAAACCCCAA











MTHFR1chr1:11866175 to 11865734aggaagagagGAGTTTTGGGATTGAGATTAGGAGTcagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctAAACAAAAAACCAAAATCAATCTTC
2chr1:11865705 to 11865291aggaagagagGAAGATTGATTTTGGTTTTTTGTTTcagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctCAACTAAACTCCCATAACACCCTAA
3chr1:11865198 to 11864850aggaagagagTAGGGTGTTATGGGAGTTTAGTTGAcagtaatacgactcactatagggagaaggctAAAATTCATTTCTTTCAAACTATCCA
Participant DNA samples were bisulfite-treated and purified using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold kit from ZymoResearch (cat# D-5007) according to manufacturer’s protocol. This bisulfite conversion (BSC) step selectively deaminates unmethylated cytosines to uracil, but has no effect on 5-methyl-cytosines thereby leading to a primary DNA sequence change that permits differentiation of unmethylated cytosines from methylated cytosines. The regions of interest for DNMT3B and MTHFR were analyzed in 4 and 3 fragments spanning approximately 500 base pairs each, respectively. For each of the 7 fragments, 25 ng of BSC DNA was used to quantify methylation ratios within CpG units (a unit consists of either an individual CpG site or aggregates of multiple CpG sites) located within each fragment. A methylation ratio equals the percentage of methylated cytosines at a specific CpG unit of a gene, divided by the total number of copies of that CpG unit in the sample. For CpG units that consisted of multiple CpG sites, the methylation ratio of that CpG unit was assigned to each of the CpG sites within that unit. Three 96-well plates containing participant samples were run per fragment and for quality control, two high methylated human DNA controls and two low methylated human DNA controls manufactured by EpigenDx were included on each plate. Reliability was assessed using the two high methylated quality control samples and coefficients of variation (CV) were calculated between-plates; the low methylated DNA quality control sample was not utilized as the CV is sensitive to small changes to the mean when the mean is close to zero. For the high methylated DNA quality control sample, the CV between-plates was 5%.

Raw data processing and statistical analysis

Raw data consisted of methylation ratios for 147 CpG sites for DNMT3B and 83 CpG sites for MTHFR. Methylation data was cleaned separately for DNMT3B and MTHFR to remove methylation ratios for CpG sites that were unreliable and had little variability (SD≤0.02) (Fig. 1). Specifically, unreliable methylation ratios for CpG sites were defined as either having: (1) low or high mass outside of the limit of detection of the Sequenom EpiTYPER assay or; (2) more than one silent peak or; (3) overlapping signals or; (4) duplicate CpG units of the same mass. Applying these criteria for DNMT3B, 50 of 147 methylation ratios for CpG sites were excluded. For MTHFR, 26 of 83 methylation ratios for CpG sites were excluded. CpG sites were subsequently defined as informative if they had methylation ratios with standard deviations >0.02; this cut-off was applied to ensure that the calculated methlyation measures were based on methylation ratios for CpG sites displaying meaningful differences. For DNMT3B, methylation ratios for 66 CpG sites had a standard deviation greater than 0.02. For MTHFR, methylation ratios for 28 CpG sites had a standard deviation greater than 0.02. These CpG sites were henceforth considered informative for statistical analysis. For DNMT3B, 31 of 66 informative CpG sites had complete data; for the remaining 35 CpG sites, methylation ratios for 1 or more CpG sites were missing for less than 11% of participants. Of the 28 informative CpG sites in MTHFR, data was complete for 4 CpG sites; for the remaining 24 CpG sites, methylation ratios for 1 or more CpG sites were missing for less than 4% of participants. All missing values were assigned the mean methylation ratio for each CpG site. To ensure that each participant had only a small proportion of missing values imputed, participants with data missing for >10% of CpG sites within DNMT3B or MTHFR were excluded. Based on this cutoff, a total of 259 and 269 participants were included in the statistical analysis for DNMT3B and MTHFR, respectively.
Fig. 1

Data cleaning and processing of methylation ratios for CpG sites within the DNMT3B and MTHFR genes.

For the statistical analysis, gene-specific DNA methylation was conceptualized using two approaches. First, measures representing average methylation across all informative CpG sites were created. Second, unsupervised principal component (PC) analysis was used as a pattern derivation and data-reduction approach, to develop two summary variables (PC1 and PC2) which together accounted for 32% and 42% of the variance of DNA methylation within informative CpG sites in DNMT3B and MTHFR, respectively.

Descriptive analysis of gene-specific DNA methylation in DNMT3B and MTHFR

The percent methylation of each informative CpG site for DNMT3B and MTHFR is presented in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, respectively. The x-axis of the figures denotes where each informative CpG site resides with reference to chromosome location; the y-axis denotes the percent methylation of each informative CpG site. For DNMT3B, average percent methylation across all informative CpG sites among events and non-events was 11% (SD=0.03) and 11% (SD=0.04), respectively. For MTHFR, average percent methylation among events was 13% (SD=0.03) while among non-events was 12% (SD=0.02).
Fig. 2

(A) Average methylation ratio for each informative CpG site in DNMT3B according to chromosome location. CpG sites with Eigenvalues greater than 0.20 for PC1 and PC2 are indicated in red and green, respectively. (B) Diagram illustrating the transcription start site and exon 1 of the DNMT3b gene within the targeted CpG island. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 3

(A) Average percent methylation ratio for each informative CpG site in MTHFR according to chromosome location. CpG sites with Eigenvalues greater than 0.20 for PC1 and PC2 are indicated in red and green, respectively. (B) Diagram illustrating the transcription start site and exon 1 of the MTHFR gene within the targeted CpG island. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

To evaluate possible patterns and correlations within the data, we differentiated CpG sites which correlated with each PC. Specifically, in Fig. 2, Fig. 3, the CpG sites with Eigenvalues greater than 0.20 for PC1 are illustrated in red while those with Eigenvalues greater than 0.20 for PC2 are in green; CpG sites that did not have Eigenvalues greater than 0.20 for neither PCs are in gray. For both DNMT3B (Fig. 2) and MTHFR (Fig. 3), methylation ratios of CpG sites around the transcriptional start site and the gene-coding area were correlated and comprised PC1 and PC2.
Subject areaEpidemiology
More specific subject areaCancer, Epigenetics
Type of dataTable, figure
How data was acquiredSequenom EpiTYPER
Data formatRaw data
Experimental factorsLeukocytic DNA was isolated from blood samples collected from 272 patients undergoing a screening colonoscopy. Ninety participants were diagnosed with one or more pathologically-confirmed tubular, tubullo-villous or villous adenoma(s), while 182 patients had no abnormality identified during colonoscopy.
Experimental featuresThe Sequenom EpiTYPER® technology was used to quantify DNA methylation in 66 and 28 CpG sites of DNMT3B and MTHFR.
Data source locationKingston, Ontario, Canada
Data accessibilityData is available with this article
  13 in total

1.  DNMT3B polymorphisms and cancer risk: a meta analysis of 24 case-control studies.

Authors:  Shimiao Zhu; Hui Zhang; Yang Tang; Peicai Liu; Jianmin Wang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Gene-specific DNA methylation of DNMT3B and MTHFR and colorectal adenoma risk.

Authors:  Vikki Ho; Janet E Ashbury; Sherryl Taylor; Stephen Vanner; Will D King
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  A DNA methylation signature associated with aberrant promoter DNA hypermethylation of DNMT3B in human colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Covadonga Huidobro; Rocío G Urdinguio; Ramón María Rodríguez; Cristina Mangas; Vincenzo Calvanese; Pablo Martínez-Camblor; Cecilia Ferrero; Adolfo Parra-Blanco; Luis Rodrigo; Alvaro J Obaya; Laura Suárez-Fernández; Aurora Astudillo; Henar Hernando; Esteban Ballestar; Agustín F Fernández; Mario F Fraga
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  DNA methylation changes associated with risk factors in tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract.

Authors:  Samson Mani; Katarzyna Szymańska; Cyrille Cuenin; David Zaridze; Karen Balassiano; Sheila C S Lima; Elena Matos; Alexander Daudt; Sergio Koifman; Victor Wunsch Filho; Ana M B Menezes; Maria Paula Curado; Gilles Ferro; Thomas Vaissière; Bakary S Sylla; Massimo Tommasino; Luis Felipe Ribeiro Pinto; Paolo Boffetta; Pierre Hainaut; Paul Brennan; Zdenko Herceg
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.528

5.  Epigenetic regulation of DNA methyltransferases: DNMT1 and DNMT3B in gliomas.

Authors:  Ganeshkumar Rajendran; Karthik Shanmuganandam; Ameya Bendre; Dattatraya Muzumdar; Dattatreya Mujumdar; Abhay Goel; Anjali Shiras
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Quantitative high-throughput analysis of DNA methylation patterns by base-specific cleavage and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Mathias Ehrich; Matthew R Nelson; Patrick Stanssens; Marc Zabeau; Triantafillos Liloglou; George Xinarianos; Charles R Cantor; John K Field; Dirk van den Boom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project.

Authors:  Ewan Birney; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Anindya Dutta; Roderic Guigó; Thomas R Gingeras; Elliott H Margulies; Zhiping Weng; Michael Snyder; Emmanouil T Dermitzakis; Robert E Thurman; Michael S Kuehn; Christopher M Taylor; Shane Neph; Christoph M Koch; Saurabh Asthana; Ankit Malhotra; Ivan Adzhubei; Jason A Greenbaum; Robert M Andrews; Paul Flicek; Patrick J Boyle; Hua Cao; Nigel P Carter; Gayle K Clelland; Sean Davis; Nathan Day; Pawandeep Dhami; Shane C Dillon; Michael O Dorschner; Heike Fiegler; Paul G Giresi; Jeff Goldy; Michael Hawrylycz; Andrew Haydock; Richard Humbert; Keith D James; Brett E Johnson; Ericka M Johnson; Tristan T Frum; Elizabeth R Rosenzweig; Neerja Karnani; Kirsten Lee; Gregory C Lefebvre; Patrick A Navas; Fidencio Neri; Stephen C J Parker; Peter J Sabo; Richard Sandstrom; Anthony Shafer; David Vetrie; Molly Weaver; Sarah Wilcox; Man Yu; Francis S Collins; Job Dekker; Jason D Lieb; Thomas D Tullius; Gregory E Crawford; Shamil Sunyaev; William S Noble; Ian Dunham; France Denoeud; Alexandre Reymond; Philipp Kapranov; Joel Rozowsky; Deyou Zheng; Robert Castelo; Adam Frankish; Jennifer Harrow; Srinka Ghosh; Albin Sandelin; Ivo L Hofacker; Robert Baertsch; Damian Keefe; Sujit Dike; Jill Cheng; Heather A Hirsch; Edward A Sekinger; Julien Lagarde; Josep F Abril; Atif Shahab; Christoph Flamm; Claudia Fried; Jörg Hackermüller; Jana Hertel; Manja Lindemeyer; Kristin Missal; Andrea Tanzer; Stefan Washietl; Jan Korbel; Olof Emanuelsson; Jakob S Pedersen; Nancy Holroyd; Ruth Taylor; David Swarbreck; Nicholas Matthews; Mark C Dickson; Daryl J Thomas; Matthew T Weirauch; James Gilbert; Jorg Drenkow; Ian Bell; XiaoDong Zhao; K G Srinivasan; Wing-Kin Sung; Hong Sain Ooi; Kuo Ping Chiu; Sylvain Foissac; Tyler Alioto; Michael Brent; Lior Pachter; Michael L Tress; Alfonso Valencia; Siew Woh Choo; Chiou Yu Choo; Catherine Ucla; Caroline Manzano; Carine Wyss; Evelyn Cheung; Taane G Clark; James B Brown; Madhavan Ganesh; Sandeep Patel; Hari Tammana; Jacqueline Chrast; Charlotte N Henrichsen; Chikatoshi Kai; Jun Kawai; Ugrappa Nagalakshmi; Jiaqian Wu; Zheng Lian; Jin Lian; Peter Newburger; Xueqing Zhang; Peter Bickel; John S Mattick; Piero Carninci; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Sherman Weissman; Tim Hubbard; Richard M Myers; Jane Rogers; Peter F Stadler; Todd M Lowe; Chia-Lin Wei; Yijun Ruan; Kevin Struhl; Mark Gerstein; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Yutao Fu; Eric D Green; Ulaş Karaöz; Adam Siepel; James Taylor; Laura A Liefer; Kris A Wetterstrand; Peter J Good; Elise A Feingold; Mark S Guyer; Gregory M Cooper; George Asimenos; Colin N Dewey; Minmei Hou; Sergey Nikolaev; Juan I Montoya-Burgos; Ari Löytynoja; Simon Whelan; Fabio Pardi; Tim Massingham; Haiyan Huang; Nancy R Zhang; Ian Holmes; James C Mullikin; Abel Ureta-Vidal; Benedict Paten; Michael Seringhaus; Deanna Church; Kate Rosenbloom; W James Kent; Eric A Stone; Serafim Batzoglou; Nick Goldman; Ross C Hardison; David Haussler; Webb Miller; Arend Sidow; Nathan D Trinklein; Zhengdong D Zhang; Leah Barrera; Rhona Stuart; David C King; Adam Ameur; Stefan Enroth; Mark C Bieda; Jonghwan Kim; Akshay A Bhinge; Nan Jiang; Jun Liu; Fei Yao; Vinsensius B Vega; Charlie W H Lee; Patrick Ng; Atif Shahab; Annie Yang; Zarmik Moqtaderi; Zhou Zhu; Xiaoqin Xu; Sharon Squazzo; Matthew J Oberley; David Inman; Michael A Singer; Todd A Richmond; Kyle J Munn; Alvaro Rada-Iglesias; Ola Wallerman; Jan Komorowski; Joanna C Fowler; Phillippe Couttet; Alexander W Bruce; Oliver M Dovey; Peter D Ellis; Cordelia F Langford; David A Nix; Ghia Euskirchen; Stephen Hartman; Alexander E Urban; Peter Kraus; Sara Van Calcar; Nate Heintzman; Tae Hoon Kim; Kun Wang; Chunxu Qu; Gary Hon; Rosa Luna; Christopher K Glass; M Geoff Rosenfeld; Shelley Force Aldred; Sara J Cooper; Anason Halees; Jane M Lin; Hennady P Shulha; Xiaoling Zhang; Mousheng Xu; Jaafar N S Haidar; Yong Yu; Yijun Ruan; Vishwanath R Iyer; Roland D Green; Claes Wadelius; Peggy J Farnham; Bing Ren; Rachel A Harte; Angie S Hinrichs; Heather Trumbower; Hiram Clawson; Jennifer Hillman-Jackson; Ann S Zweig; Kayla Smith; Archana Thakkapallayil; Galt Barber; Robert M Kuhn; Donna Karolchik; Lluis Armengol; Christine P Bird; Paul I W de Bakker; Andrew D Kern; Nuria Lopez-Bigas; Joel D Martin; Barbara E Stranger; Abigail Woodroffe; Eugene Davydov; Antigone Dimas; Eduardo Eyras; Ingileif B Hallgrímsdóttir; Julian Huppert; Michael C Zody; Gonçalo R Abecasis; Xavier Estivill; Gerard G Bouffard; Xiaobin Guan; Nancy F Hansen; Jacquelyn R Idol; Valerie V B Maduro; Baishali Maskeri; Jennifer C McDowell; Morgan Park; Pamela J Thomas; Alice C Young; Robert W Blakesley; Donna M Muzny; Erica Sodergren; David A Wheeler; Kim C Worley; Huaiyang Jiang; George M Weinstock; Richard A Gibbs; Tina Graves; Robert Fulton; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; Michele Clamp; James Cuff; Sante Gnerre; David B Jaffe; Jean L Chang; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Eric S Lander; Maxim Koriabine; Mikhail Nefedov; Kazutoyo Osoegawa; Yuko Yoshinaga; Baoli Zhu; Pieter J de Jong
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Meta- and pooled analyses of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism and colorectal cancer: a HuGE-GSEC review.

Authors:  E Taioli; M A Garza; Y O Ahn; D T Bishop; J Bost; B Budai; K Chen; F Gemignani; T Keku; C S P Lima; L Le Marchand; K Matsuo; V Moreno; J Plaschke; M Pufulete; S B Thomas; G Toffoli; C R Wolf; C G Moore; J Little
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  A new method for accurate assessment of DNA quality after bisulfite treatment.

Authors:  Mathias Ehrich; Scott Zoll; Sudipto Sur; Dirk van den Boom
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Genomic profiling of CpG methylation and allelic specificity using quantitative high-throughput mass spectrometry: critical evaluation and improvements.

Authors:  Marcel W Coolen; Aaron L Statham; Margaret Gardiner-Garden; Susan J Clark
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  2 in total

1.  Aerobic exercise and DNA methylation in postmenopausal women: An ancillary analysis of the Alberta Physical Activity and Breast Cancer Prevention (ALPHA) Trial.

Authors:  Devon J Boyne; Will D King; Darren R Brenner; John B McIntyre; Kerry S Courneya; Christine M Friedenreich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Monozygotic twins and triplets discordant for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis display differential methylation and gene expression.

Authors:  Ingrid S Tarr; Emily P McCann; Beben Benyamin; Timothy J Peters; Natalie A Twine; Katharine Y Zhang; Qiongyi Zhao; Zong-Hong Zhang; Dominic B Rowe; Garth A Nicholson; Denis Bauer; Susan J Clark; Ian P Blair; Kelly L Williams
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.