| Literature DB >> 26759810 |
Zhuan Wei1, Jue Zhou2, WenJing Sun2, FengJie Cui2, QinHua Xu3, ChangFeng Liu3.
Abstract
D-Ribose is a five-carbon sugar and generally used as an energy source to improve athletic performance and the ability. The culture conditions for maximum D-ribose production performance from cheap raw material corn starch hydrolysate were improved by using one-factor-at-a-time experiments and a three-level Box-Behnken factorial design. The optimal fermentation parameters were obtained as 36°C culture temperature, 10% inoculum volume, and 7.0 initial pH. The mathematical model was then developed to show the effect of each medium composition and their interactions on the production of D-ribose and estimated that the optimized D-ribose production performance with the concentration of 62.13 g/L, yield of 0.40 g/g, and volumetric productivity of 0.86 g/L·h could be obtained when the medium compositions were set as 157 g/L glucose, 21 g/L corn steep liquor, 3.2 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 1 g/L yeast extract, 0.05 g/L MnSO4·H2O, and 20 g/L CaCO3. These findings indicated the D-ribose production performance was significantly improved compared to that under original conditions.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26759810 PMCID: PMC4681011 DOI: 10.1155/2015/535097
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Box-Behnken design matrix along with the experimental and predicted values.
| Run | Actual and coded level of variables | D-Ribose production (g/L) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Experimental | Predicted | |
| 1 | 150 (0) | 20 (0) | 3.0 (0) | 60.64 ± 1.34 | 60.29 |
| 2 | 150 (0) | 25 (+1) | 4.5 (+1) | 54.32 ± 2.12 | 54.25 |
| 3 | 180 (+1) | 25 (+1) | 3.0 (0) | 52.09 ± 1.22 | 51.31 |
| 4 | 150 (0) | 15 (−1) | 1.5 (−1) | 49.49 ± 2.01 | 49.56 |
| 5 | 150 (0) | 20 (0) | 3.0 (0) | 60.20 ± 1.67 | 60.29 |
| 6 | 180 (+1) | 20 (0) | 4.5 (+1) | 50.23 ± 1.34 | 51.08 |
| 7 | 120 (−1) | 25 (+1) | 3.0 (0) | 40.82 ± 3.10 | 41.61 |
| 8 | 120 (−1) | 20 (0) | 4.5 (+1) | 42.00 ± 3.12 | 41.28 |
| 9 | 180 (+1) | 20 (0) | 1.5 (−1) | 47.92 ± 1.45 | 48.64 |
| 10 | 180 (+1) | 15 (−1) | 3.0 (0) | 50.72 ± 1.33 | 49.93 |
| 11 | 150 (0) | 20 (0) | 3.0 (0) | 60.04 ± 2.03 | 60.29 |
| 12 | 150 (0) | 25 (+1) | 1.5 (−1) | 53.64 ± 1.34 | 53.71 |
| 13 | 120 (−1) | 20 (0) | 1.5 (−1) | 38.92 ± 1.43 | 38.07 |
| 14 | 120 (−1) | 15 (−1) | 3.0 (0) | 38.48 ± 1.98 | 39.26 |
| 15 | 150 (0) | 15 (−1) | 4.5 (+1) | 54.75 ± 2.50 | 54.68 |
Figure 1Effect of temperature on D-ribose production performance of B. subtilis UJS0717 (fermentation time: 72 h; initial pH 7.0; inoculum volume: 10%, v/v; P < 0.05 compared to 30°C group).
Effect of inoculum volume on D-ribose production performance by B. subtilis UJS0717.
| Inoculum volume | Initial glucose | Residual glucose | Glucose consumption | Glucose consumption | Cell concentration | D-Ribose | D-Ribose yield | D-Ribose productivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5% | 122.0 | 12.75 ± 0.14 | 89.55 ± 0.11 | 1.52 ± 0.00 | 7.79 ± 0.01 | 31.23 ± 0.35 | 0.29 ± 0.00 | 0.43 ± 0.00 |
| 10% | 122.0 | 4.50 ± 0.35 | 96.31 ± 0.29 | 1.63 ± 0.00 | 8.70 ± 0.32 | 36.00 ± 0.75 | 0.31 ± 0.00 | 0.50 ± 0.00 |
| 15% | 122.0 | 6.53 ± 0.58 | 94.65 ± 0.47 | 1.60 ± 0.00 | 9.30 ± 0.20 | 34.73 ± 0.66 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.48 ± 0.00 |
| 20% | 122.0 | 6.51 ± 0.67 | 94.66 ± 0.55 | 1.60 ± 0.00 | 9.37 ± 0.10 | 34.91 ± 0.58 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.49 ± 0.00 |
P < 0.05 compared to 5% inoculum volume (v/v) group.
Effect of the initial pH on D-ribose production performance by B. subtilis UJS0717.
| Initial pH | Initial glucose | Residual glucose | Glucose consumption | Glucose consumption | Cell concentration | D-Ribose | D-Ribose yield | D-Ribose productivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 122.0 | 11.25 ± 0.12 | 90.78 ± 0.10 | 1.54 ± 0.00 | 7.95 ± 0.15 | 30.92 ± 0.47 | 0.28 ± 0.00 | 0.43 ± 0.00 |
| 6.5 | 122.0 | 8.95 ± 0.05 | 92.66 ± 0.04 | 1.57 ± 0.00 | 8.60 ± 0.25 | 31.35 ± 0.35 | 0.28 ± 0.00 | 0.43 ± 0.00 |
| 7.0 | 122.0 | 4.50 ± 0.35 | 96.31 ± 0.29 | 1.63 ± 0.00 | 8.70 ± 0.32 | 36.00 ± 0.75 | 0.31 ± 0.00 | 0.50 ± 0.00 |
| 7.5 | 122.0 | 6.85 ± 0.18 | 94.39 ± 0.15 | 1.60 ± 0.00 | 8.35 ± 0.35 | 34.57 ± 0.55 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.48 ± 0.01 |
| 8.0 | 122.0 | 8.55 ± 0.14 | 92.99 ± 0.11 | 1.57 ± 0.00 | 8.15 ± 0.25 | 31.76 ± 0.68 | 0.28 ± 0.00 | 0.44 ± 0.00 |
P < 0.05 compared to pH 6.0 group.
Figure 2Effect of glucose concentration on D-ribose production performance of B. subtilis UJS0717 (corn steep liquor: 15 g/L; (NH4)2SO4: 7.5 g/L).
Effect of corn steep liquor concentration on D-ribose production performance by B. subtilis UJS0717.
| Corn steep liquor | Initial glucose | Residual glucose | Glucose consumption | Glucose consumption | Cell concentration | D-Ribose | D-Ribose yield | D-Ribose productivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 152.0 | 28.00 ± 1.14 | 81.58 ± 0.93 | 1.72 ± 0.02 | 5.71 ± 0.11 | 28.89 ± 0.94 | 0.23 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.00 |
| 10 | 152.0 | 18.00 ± 0.14 | 88.16 ± 0.09 | 1.86 ± 0.00 | 7.41 ± 0.10 | 34.15 ± 1.54 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.47 ± 0.00 |
| 15 | 152.0 | 6.40 ± 0.06 | 95.79 ± 0.04 | 2.02 ± 0.00 | 10.16 ± 0.16 | 48.25 ± 0.24 | 0.33 ± 0.00 | 0.67 ± 0.00 |
| 20 | 152.0 | 0.13 ± 0.04 | 99.91 ± 0.03 | 2.11 ± 0.00 | 10.71 ± 0.21 | 54.02 ± 0.89 | 0.36 ± 0.00 | 0.75 ± 0.00 |
| 25 | 152.0 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 99.88 ± 0.03 | 2.11 ± 0.00 | 10.21 ± 0.09 | 48.84 ± 0.26 | 0.32 ± 0.00 | 0.68 ± 0.00 |
P < 0.05 compared to corn steep liquor concentration of 5 g/L group.
Effect of (NH4)2SO4 concentration on D-ribose production performance by B. subtilis UJS0717.
| (NH4)2SO4 concentration (g/L) | Initial glucose | Residual glucose | Glucose consumption | Glucose consumption | Cell concentration | D-Ribose | D-Ribose yield | D-Ribose productivity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.5 | 151.0 | 3.85 ± 0.14 | 97.45 ± 0.09 | 2.04 ± 0.00 | 9.40 ± 0.30 | 45.81 ± 1.23 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.64 ± 0.01 |
| 3.0 | 151.0 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 99.92 ± 0.00 | 2.09 ± 0.00 | 10.77 ± 0.17 | 60.11 ± 0.12 | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 0.84 ± 0.01 |
| 4.5 | 151.0 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 99.81 ± 0.01 | 2.09 ± 0.00 | 10.65 ± 0.15 | 56.25 ± 0.67 | 0.37 ± 0.00 | 0.78 ± 0.01 |
| 6.0 | 151.0 | 5.59 ± 0.21 | 96.30 ± 0.14 | 2.02 ± 0.00 | 9.15 ± 0.15 | 42.89 ± 0.17 | 0.29 ± 0.00 | 0.60 ± 0.00 |
| 7.5 | 151.0 | 0.80 ± 0.14 | 99.47 ± 0.09 | 2.09 ± 0.00 | 10.55 ± 0.35 | 54.56 ± 0.30 | 0.36 ± 0.00 | 0.76 ± 0.00 |
| 9.0 | 151.0 | 5.43 ± 0.04 | 96.40 ± 0.28 | 2.02 ± 0.00 | 9.25 ± 0.25 | 43.04 ± 0.64 | 0.30 ± 0.00 | 0.60 ± 0.00 |
P < 0.05 compared to (NH4)2SO4 concentration of 1.5 g/L group.
Analysis of variance for the response surface quadratic model of D-ribose concentration of Box-Behnken design.
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 779.43 | 9 | 86.60 | 83.91 | <0.0001 |
|
| 207.47 | 1 | 207.47 | 201.01 | <0.0001 |
|
| 6.90 | 1 | 6.90 | 6.69 | 0.0491 |
|
| 16.05 | 1 | 16.05 | 15.55 | 0.0109 |
|
| 0.24 | 1 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.6532 |
|
| 0.15 | 1 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.7203 |
|
| 5.24 | 1 | 5.24 | 5.08 | 0.0739 |
|
| 490.36 | 1 | 490.36 | 475.09 | <0.0001 |
|
| 38.80 | 1 | 38.80 | 37.59 | 0.0017 |
|
| 59.13 | 1 | 59.13 | 57.29 | 0.0006 |
| Residual | 5.16 | 5 | 1.03 | ||
|
| 4.97 | 3 | 1.66 | 17.15 | 0.0556 |
|
| 0.19 | 2 | 0.097 | ||
| Cor. total | 784.59 | 14 |
Note: CV% = 2.02; R 2 = 0.9934; Adj. R 2 = 0.9816; Pred. R 2 = 0.8981. Note: X 1 = glucose (g/L); X 2 = corn steep liquor (g/L); X 3 = (NH4)2SO4 (g/L).
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01.
Figure 3(a) The 3D-plot and 2D-projection showing the interaction between glucose and corn steep liquor at 3.0 g/L (NH4)2SO4 on D-ribose concentration (Y). (b) The 3D-plot and 2D-projection showing the interaction between glucose and (NH4)2SO4 at 20 g/L corn steep liquor on D-ribose concentration (Y). (c) The 3D-plot and 2D-projection showing the interaction between corn steep liquor and (NH4)2SO4 at 150 g/L glucose on D-ribose concentration (Y).
Figure 4Comparison of D-ribose production performance of B. subtilis UJS0717 before and after optimization ((a) before optimization; (b) after optimization).
Summarized results of D-ribose biosynthesis previously described in literature.
| Strain | Culture mode | Glucose (g/L) | D-Ribose (g/L) | Fermentation time (h) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Batch | 157 | 62.13 | 72 | In the present work |
|
| Batch | 125 | 31 | 55 | [ |
|
| Batch | 150 | 67 | 60 | [ |
|
| Batch | 140 | 64 | 55 | [ |
|
| Batch | 200 | 95 | 72 | [ |
|
| Batch | 160 | 62 | 72 | [ |
|
| Batch | 100/100a | 60 | 110 | [ |
|
| Batch | 100/50b | 45 | 84 | [ |
|
| Batch | 180 | 60.9 | 68 | [ |
|
| Fed-batch | 20/20 + 200/50c | 46.6 | 63 | [ |
|
| Batch | 200 | 83.4 | 42 | [ |
|
| Shake-flask | 172.75 | 88.57 | 72 | [ |
|
| Batch | 172.75 | 95.27 | 72 | [ |
|
| Single-stage, continuous | 200d | 68.7 | 160 | [ |
a100 g/L glucose plus 100 g/L D-gluconic acid.
b100 g/L glucose plus 50 g/L D-gluconic acid.
cAfter initial sugars of 20 g/L xylose and 20 g/L glucose were consumed completely, a sugar mixture of 200 g/L xylose and 50 g/L glucose was fed stepwise into a bioreactor.
dInitial glucose 200 g/L, starting time 24 h, dilution rates 0.006/h, and influent glucose concentration 200 g/L.