Literature DB >> 2675940

Oestrogen and progestin receptors as prognostic indicators in endometrial cancer. A review of the literature.

A Kauppila1.   

Abstract

The history of research on oestrogen and progestin receptors in endometrial cancer goes back about 20 years. Summarized data from several clinical studies demonstrate that cytosol oestrogen (ERC) and progestin receptors (PRC) are clinically useful indicators of prognosis. Absence of receptor or its low concentration is indicative of an increased risk of recurrent malignancy. In this respect PRC tends to be more sensitive than ERC. In some studies PRC assay appeared to be more strongly correlated to prognosis than any of the conventional clinico-pathological parameters. In addition, the information obtained by ERC and/or PRC assay is independent of and additional to the classical prognostic indicators. The value of ERC and PRC assay in predicting the sensitivity of endometrial cancer to progestin therapy is of clinical interest. The accumulated data for many clinical trials show that in detecting the non-responders to progestin therapy negative results of ERC and PRC give similar information with an accuracy of about 90%. In identifying responders to progestin therapy, a positive PRC result appeared to give more precise information than a positive ERC, the accuracy being about 75% for PRC. The use of the combination of ERC and PRC determination as a prognostic indicator or predictor of sensitivity to progestin therapy does not significantly increase the information available by PRC measurement alone. Hence, whatever used--a biochemical ligand binding technique or immunohistochemical staining--PRC determination alone seems recommendable for clinical purposes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2675940     DOI: 10.3109/02841868909092271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  4 in total

1.  Endometrial Cancer Risk Factors, Hormone Receptors, and Mortality Prediction.

Authors:  Evan L Busch; Marta Crous-Bou; Jennifer Prescott; Maxine M Chen; Michael J Downing; Bernard A Rosner; George L Mutter; Immaculata De Vivo
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Oestrogen receptor analysis: correlation between enzyme immunoassay and immunohistochemical methods.

Authors:  T A Aasmundstad; O A Haugen; E Johannesen; A L Høe; S Kvinnsland
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 3.  Molecular targeted therapy in gynaecologic malignancies: primer for radiologists.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Suh; Sree H Tirumani; Abhishek Keraliya; Kyung Won Kim; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Atul B Shinagare
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Nucleophosmin/B23 is a negative regulator of estrogen receptor α expression via AP2γ in endometrial cancer cells.

Authors:  Chiao-Yun Lin; Angel Chao; Tzu-Hao Wang; Li-Yu Lee; Lan-Yan Yang; Chia-Lung Tsai; Hsin-Shih Wang; Chyong-Huey Lai
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-09-13
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.