Literature DB >> 26758852

Does activity affect the outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement?

Adam M Ali1, Hemant Pandit2, Alexander D Liddle1, Cathy Jenkins3, Stephen Mellon1, Christopher A F Dodd3, David W Murray4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High levels of activity are considered to be a contraindication to unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) and are not recommended after UKR. To determine if these recommendations should apply to the mobile-bearing Oxford UKR, this study assessed the effect of post-operative activity level on the outcome of this device.
METHODS: The outcome of the first 1000 Phase 3 cemented Oxford UKRs implanted between 1998 and 2010 was assessed using survival analysis, the Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the American Knee Society Objective (KSS-O) and Functional (KSS-F) Scores. Patients were grouped according to the maximum post-operative Tegner Activity Score.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 6.1 years (range 1 to 14). Overall, increasing activity was associated with superior survival (p=0.025). In the high activity group, with Tegner≥5 (n=115) 2.6% were revised and the 12-year survival was 97.3% (confidence interval (CI): 92.0% to 99.1%). In the low activity group, with Tegner≤4, (n=885) 4.3% were revised and the 12-year survival was 94.0% (CI: 91.4 to 95.8). The difference between the two groups was not significant (p=0.44). Although the final OKS and KSS-F were significantly better in the high activity group compared to the low activity group (OKS 45v40, KSS-F 95v78), there was no difference in the change in OKS or KSS-O.
CONCLUSIONS: High activity does not compromise the outcome of the Oxford UKR and may improve it. Activity should not be restricted nor considered to be a contraindication.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity level; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26758852     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  5 in total

1.  Does Activity Level After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Affect Aseptic Survival?

Authors:  David A Crawford; Joanne B Adams; Gerald R Hobbs; Michael J Morris; Keith R Berend; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-08-23

2.  Update on unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications and failure modes.

Authors:  Michele Vasso; Alexander Antoniadis; Naeder Helmy
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 3.  Medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee: a review of surgical options.

Authors:  Daniel J McCormack; Darren Puttock; Steven P Godsiff
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-02-01

4.  Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: Current indications, technical issues and results.

Authors:  E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán; Primitivo Gómez-Cardero
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2018-06-06

5.  The effect of age on the outcomes of cementless mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacements.

Authors:  Hasan Raza Mohammad; Stephen Mellon; Andrew Judge; Christopher Dodd; David Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.342

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.