Literature DB >> 26758822

Incorporating Midbrain Adaptation to Mean Sound Level Improves Models of Auditory Cortical Processing.

Ben D B Willmore1, Oliver Schoppe2, Andrew J King3, Jan W H Schnupp3, Nicol S Harper3.   

Abstract

Adaptation to stimulus statistics, such as the mean level and contrast of recently heard sounds, has been demonstrated at various levels of the auditory pathway. It allows the nervous system to operate over the wide range of intensities and contrasts found in the natural world. Yet current standard models of the response properties of auditory neurons do not incorporate such adaptation. Here we present a model of neural responses in the ferret auditory cortex (the IC Adaptation model), which takes into account adaptation to mean sound level at a lower level of processing: the inferior colliculus (IC). The model performs high-pass filtering with frequency-dependent time constants on the sound spectrogram, followed by half-wave rectification, and passes the output to a standard linear-nonlinear (LN) model. We find that the IC Adaptation model consistently predicts cortical responses better than the standard LN model for a range of synthetic and natural stimuli. The IC Adaptation model introduces no extra free parameters, so it improves predictions without sacrificing parsimony. Furthermore, the time constants of adaptation in the IC appear to be matched to the statistics of natural sounds, suggesting that neurons in the auditory midbrain predict the mean level of future sounds and adapt their responses appropriately. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: An ability to accurately predict how sensory neurons respond to novel stimuli is critical if we are to fully characterize their response properties. Attempts to model these responses have had a distinguished history, but it has proven difficult to improve their predictive power significantly beyond that of simple, mostly linear receptive field models. Here we show that auditory cortex receptive field models benefit from a nonlinear preprocessing stage that replicates known adaptation properties of the auditory midbrain. This improves their predictive power across a wide range of stimuli but keeps model complexity low as it introduces no new free parameters. Incorporating the adaptive coding properties of neurons will likely improve receptive field models in other sensory modalities too.
Copyright © 2016 Willmore, Schoppe et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptation; auditory cortex; inferior colliculus; mean sound level; model; spectrotemporal receptive field

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26758822      PMCID: PMC4710761          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2441-15.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  54 in total

1.  Spatial structure of complex cell receptive fields measured with natural images.

Authors:  Jon Touryan; Gidon Felsen; Yang Dan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-03-03       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Independence of luminance and contrast in natural scenes and in the early visual system.

Authors:  Valerio Mante; Robert A Frazor; Vincent Bonin; Wilson S Geisler; Matteo Carandini
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-11-13       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  How close are we to understanding v1?

Authors:  Bruno A Olshausen; David J Field
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.026

4.  Optimizing sound features for cortical neurons.

Authors:  R C deCharms; D T Blake; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-29       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Hierarchical representations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Neural representation of natural images in visual area V2.

Authors:  Ben D B Willmore; Ryan J Prenger; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A three-dimensional spatiotemporal receptive field model explains responses of area MT neurons to naturalistic movies.

Authors:  Shinji Nishimoto; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Sound texture perception via statistics of the auditory periphery: evidence from sound synthesis.

Authors:  Josh H McDermott; Eero P Simoncelli
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Adaptation to stimulus statistics in the perception and neural representation of auditory space.

Authors:  Johannes C Dahmen; Peter Keating; Fernando R Nodal; Andreas L Schulz; Andrew J King
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Contrast gain control in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Neil C Rabinowitz; Ben D B Willmore; Jan W H Schnupp; Andrew J King
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  22 in total

1.  Neural responses to natural and model-matched stimuli reveal distinct computations in primary and nonprimary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Sam V Norman-Haignere; Josh H McDermott
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 8.029

Review 2.  Contextual modulation of sound processing in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  C Angeloni; M N Geffen
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Cortical adaptation to sound reverberation.

Authors:  Ben D B Willmore; Kerry M M Walker; Nicol S Harper; Aleksandar Z Ivanov; Andrew J King
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 4.  Incorporating behavioral and sensory context into spectro-temporal models of auditory encoding.

Authors:  Stephen V David
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-31       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Sensory cortex is optimized for prediction of future input.

Authors:  Yosef Singer; Yayoi Teramoto; Ben Db Willmore; Jan Wh Schnupp; Andrew J King; Nicol S Harper
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 8.713

6.  Network Receptive Field Modeling Reveals Extensive Integration and Multi-feature Selectivity in Auditory Cortical Neurons.

Authors:  Nicol S Harper; Oliver Schoppe; Ben D B Willmore; Zhanfeng Cui; Jan W H Schnupp; Andrew J King
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Meta-adaptation in the auditory midbrain under cortical influence.

Authors:  Benjamin L Robinson; Nicol S Harper; David McAlpine
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Predictive Ensemble Decoding of Acoustical Features Explains Context-Dependent Receptive Fields.

Authors:  Izzet B Yildiz; Nima Mesgarani; Sophie Deneve
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Models of Neuronal Stimulus-Response Functions: Elaboration, Estimation, and Evaluation.

Authors:  Arne F Meyer; Ross S Williamson; Jennifer F Linden; Maneesh Sahani
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-12

10.  Olfactory coding in the turbulent realm.

Authors:  Vincent Jacob; Christelle Monsempès; Jean-Pierre Rospars; Jean-Baptiste Masson; Philippe Lucas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.