Literature DB >> 26758759

Postmarket policy considerations for biosimilar oncology drugs.

Matthew J Renwick1, Kate Smolina1, Emilie J Gladstone1, Deirdre Weymann1, Steven G Morgan2.   

Abstract

Oncology biological products are some of the most expensive drugs on the market and are a growing financial burden on patients and health-care systems. By 2020, numerous major biological cancer drugs will lose their patent protection allowing follow-on competitors, known as biosimilars, to enter the market. Clinical and regulatory considerations for biosimilars have begun to harmonise in Europe and the USA to help to define and streamline the pathway for biosimilar market authorisation. Yet, substantial international variation still exists in the pricing and market uptake of approved biosimilar oncology drugs. Differences in national postmarket policies for biosimilars might explain these disparities in pricing and uptake. In this Policy Review, policy approaches to competition between biosimilars and originators used by seven European countries--Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, and the UK--and the USA are discussed, chosen because these countries represent a variety of postmarket policies and build on conclusions from previous work. We discuss these policies within the context of interchangeability, physician prescribing, substitutability, pharmacist dispensing, hospital financing and tendering, and pricing.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26758759     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00381-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  12 in total

1.  Regulatory and Clinical Experiences with Biosimilar Filgrastim in the U.S., the European Union, Japan, and Canada.

Authors:  Brian Chen; Sumimasa Nagai; James O Armitage; Bartlett Witherspoon; Chadi Nabhan; Ashley C Godwin; Y Tony Yang; Anuhya Kommalapati; Sri Harsha Tella; Carlo DeAngelis; Dennis W Raisch; Oliver Sartor; William J Hrushesky; Paul S Ray; Paul R Yarnold; Bryan L Love; LeAnn B Norris; Kevin Knopf; Laura Bobolts; Joshua Riente; Stefano Luminari; Robert C Kane; Shamia Hoque; Charles L Bennett
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2019-03-06

2.  Comparative risk/benefit profile of biosimilar and originator erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs): data from an Italian observational study in nephrology.

Authors:  Domenico Motola; Alberto Vaccheri; Andrea Roncadori; Monia Donati; Giulia Bonaldo; Anna Covezzoli; Piera Polidori; Stefano Bianchi
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  The Rituximab Biosimilar CT-P10 in Rheumatology and Cancer: A Budget Impact Analysis in 28 European Countries.

Authors:  László Gulácsi; Valentin Brodszky; Petra Baji; Fanni Rencz; Márta Péntek
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Sex differences in the risk of receiving potentially inappropriate prescriptions among older adults.

Authors:  Steven G Morgan; Deirdre Weymann; Brandy Pratt; Kate Smolina; Emilie J Gladstone; Colette Raymond; Barbara Mintzes
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 10.668

5.  A Better Prescription: Advice for a National Strategy on Pharmaceutical Policy in Canada.

Authors:  Steven G Morgan; Marc-André Gagnon; Barbara Mintzes; Joel Lexchin
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2016-08

6.  Policies for biosimilar uptake in Europe: An overview.

Authors:  Evelien Moorkens; Arnold G Vulto; Isabelle Huys; Pieter Dylst; Brian Godman; Simon Keuerleber; Barbara Claus; Maria Dimitrova; Guenka Petrova; Ljiljana Sović-Brkičić; Juraj Slabý; Robin Šebesta; Ott Laius; Allan Karr; Morgane Beck; Jaana E Martikainen; Gisbert W Selke; Susan Spillane; Laura McCullagh; Gianluca Trifirò; Patricia Vella Bonanno; Asbjørn Mack; Antra Fogele; Anita Viksna; Magdalena Władysiuk; Helder Mota-Filipe; Dmitry Meshkov; Marija Kalaba; Simona Mencej Bedrač; Jurij Fürst; Corrine Zara; Peter Skiöld; Einar Magnússon; Steven Simoens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Supply-side and demand-side policies for biosimilars: an overview in 10 European member states.

Authors:  Cécile Rémuzat; Anna Kapuśniak; Aleksandra Caban; Dan Ionescu; Guerric Radière; Cyril Mendoza; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-04-28

8.  Key drivers for market penetration of biosimilars in Europe.

Authors:  Cécile Rémuzat; Julie Dorey; Olivier Cristeau; Dan Ionescu; Guerric Radière; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  J Mark Access Health Policy       Date:  2017-01-30

Review 9.  Biosimilars in oncology and inflammatory diseases: current and future considerations for clinicians in Latin America.

Authors:  Morton Scheinberg; Carlos Pineda; Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández; Juan José Zarbá; Aderson Damião; Luiz H Arantes; Ira Jacobs
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 5.857

10.  Prevalence of Use and Cost of Biological and Non-Biological Targeted Therapies for Cancer Treatment: A 5-Year Picture from Southern Italy.

Authors:  Simona Lucchesi; Ilaria Marcianò; Paolo Panagia; Rosanna Intelisano; Maria Pia Randazzo; Carmela Sgroi; Giuseppe Altavilla; Mariacarmela Santarpia; Vincenzo Adamo; Tindara Franchina; Francesco Ferraù; Paolina Reitano; Gianluca Trifirò
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 3.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.