| Literature DB >> 26758740 |
Youyong Kong1,2, Yuanjin Li3,4,5, Jiasong Wu6,7, Huazhong Shu8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The low quality of diffusion tensor image (DTI) could affect the accuracy of oncology diagnosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26758740 PMCID: PMC4710997 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-015-0116-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Eng Online ISSN: 1475-925X Impact factor: 2.819
Fig. 1Consecutive slices of a diffusion weighted image volume. a–d are consecutive slices derived from a three dimensional diffusion weighted image
Fig. 2Initial and learned dictionary for simulated datasets. a is the initial dictinoary and b is the learned dictionary
Fig. 3Denoising results for simulated datasets. The first row is the original diffusion weighted image. The second and third rows are the fractional anisotropy maps. The column a is the original gold standard and the column b is the noisy data. The column c, d and e are the denoising results using the MNLM, SR and our proposed method
Fig. 4Quantitative comparison of different denoising methods. a–d are the fractional anisotropy errors of noisy data and denoising results using MNLM, SR and our proposed method
Fig. 5Quantitative comparison of different denoising methods with different noise levels
Fig. 6FA maps of the denoising results for real datasets. The first and second rows are the denoising results for DTI datasets with b values of 1931 and 3091 respectively. The column a and b are the original fractional anisotropy maps and the denoised maps. The column c and d are the original and denoised color fractional anisotropy maps