Literature DB >> 26758501

Three-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir in nucleos(t)ide analog-naïve and nucleos(t)ide analog-experienced chronic hepatitis B patients.

Hsin-Ming Wang1,2, Chao-Hung Hung1,2, Chuan-Mo Lee1,2, Sheng-Nan Lu1,2, Jing-Houng Wang1,2, Yi-Hao Yen1,2, Kwong-Ming Kee1,2, Kuo-Chin Chang1,2, Po-Lin Tseng1,2, Tsung-Hui Hu1,2, Chien-Hung Chen1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study compared the efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) up to 3 years of innucleos(t)ide analog (NA)-naïve and NA-experienced chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.
METHODS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated NA-naïve and NA-experienced CHB patients were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: After 3 years of TDF therapy, 97.7%, 71%, and 45.5% NA-naïve patients achieved a virological response, alanine aminotransferase normalization, and hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, respectively. Compared with NA-naïve patients, NA-experienced patients without drug resistance and infected with lamivudine/telbivudine-resistant mutants showed similar results. In contrast, patients previously infected with adefovir-resistant mutants and with a suboptimal entecavir response showed significantly lower rates of virological response and hepatitis B e antigen loss/seroconverion than NA-naïve patients. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate markedly reduced within 12 months of TDF therapy; however, it did not decrease significantly during 12-36 months of treatment. Diabetes mellitus was an independent predictor of a ≥ 0.5 mg/dL increase above baseline in serum creatinine level, and age, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and baseline creatinine level were independent factors for > 20% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline. Liver stiffness measurements improved significantly, but bone mineral density did not change significantly during treatment. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence was low at 36 months. Age of > 60 years, cirrhosis, a low baseline platelet count and a high α-fetoprotein level at 12 months were significant predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma development.
CONCLUSIONS: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is effective and safe for NA-naïve and NA-experienced CHB patients and should be used cautiously in patients with comorbidities because of a renal dysfunction risk.
© 2016 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; entecavir; hepatitis B virus; liver stiffness measures; tenofovir

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26758501     DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13294

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  9 in total

1.  Real-World Experiences with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate: Is this the "B-Ticket"?

Authors:  Norah A Terrault
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Renal safety of tenofovir and/or entecavir in patients with chronic HBV monoinfection.

Authors:  Young-Mo Yang; Eun Joo Choi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.423

3.  Factors Related to Significant Improvement of Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Receiving Telbivudine Therapy.

Authors:  Te-Fu Lin; Ping-I Hsu; Kung-Hung Lin; Feng-Woei Tsay; Tzung-Jiun Tsai; Yan-Hua Chen; Hsien-Chung Yu
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 2.260

4.  Treatment Efficacy and Safety of Tenofovir-Based Therapy in Chronic Hepatitis B: A Real Life Cohort Study in Korea.

Authors:  Hyo Jun Ahn; Myeong Jun Song; Jeong Won Jang; Si Hyun Bae; Jong Young Choi; Seung Kew Yoon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The US Food and Drug Administration's tentative approval process and the global fight against HIV.

Authors:  Harinder Singh Chahal; Jeffrey S Murray; Martin Shimer; Peter Capella; Ryan Presto; Mary Lou Valdez; Peter G Lurie
Journal:  J Int AIDS Soc       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.396

6.  Sequential therapy from entecavir to tenofovir alafenamide versus continuous entecavir monotherapy for patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Norio Itokawa; Masanori Atsukawa; Akihito Tsubota; Koichi Takaguchi; Makoto Nakamuta; Atsushi Hiraoka; Keizo Kato; Hiroshi Abe; Shigeru Mikami; Noritomo Shimada; Makoto Chuma; Nozaki Akito; Haruki Uojima; Chikara Ogawa; Toru Asano; Joji Tani; Asahiro Morishita; Tomonori Senoh; Naoki Yamashita; Tsunekazu Oikawa; Yoshihiro Matsumoto; Mai Koeda; Yuji Yoshida; Tomohide Tanabe; Tomomi Okubo; Taeang Arai; Korenobu Hayama; Ai-Nakagawa Iwashita; Chisa Kondo; Toshifumi Tada; Hidenori Toyoda; Takashi Kumada; Katsuhiko Iwakiri
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2020-11-02

7.  Real World Experience of Telbivudine Versus Entecavir in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B, Including Long-Term Outcomes after Treatment Modification.

Authors:  Jong Won Choi; Se Hyun Kim; Jeong Hun Seo; Yong Suk Cho; Sun Young Won; Byung Kyu Park; Han Ho Jeon; Yong Kang Lee; Chun Kyon Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.759

8.  Combined effect of pegylated interferon α with adefovir on renal function in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Authors:  Qian Su; Yanyan Liu; Jiabin Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A 2-year prospective study.

Authors:  Shuqin Zheng; Longgen Liu; Jianchun Lu; Xiujun Zhang; Hongyu Shen; Hongyu Zhang; Yuan Xue; Lin Lin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.