Literature DB >> 26758411

Calcium distribution patterns of the aortic valve as a risk factor for the need of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Buntaro Fujita1, Maximilian Kütting2, Moritz Seiffert3, Smita Scholtz4, Sandrine Egron2, Emir Prashovikj5, Jochen Börgermann5, Timm Schäfer5, Werner Scholtz4, Rainer Preuss6, Jan Gummert5, Ulrich Steinseifer2, Stephan M Ensminger5.   

Abstract

AIMS: New-onset conduction disturbances still represent a considerable problem after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to identify calcification patterns with an elevated risk for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after TAVI and investigate underlying mechanisms in an ex vivo setting. METHODS AND
RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients who underwent TAVI with the Edwards SAPIEN XT® or Medtronic CoreValve® at our institution were analysed. The calcium load of the device landing zone was quantified with 3mensio®, and calcium patterns with an elevated risk for PPI were identified. Ex vivo simulations of balloon valvuloplasty were performed in 3D-printed silicone annuli of patients matching the identified risk profile. Patients with a calcium load of the left coronary cusp (LCC) above 209 mm3 had a higher rate of PPI than patients below this threshold (16.7 vs. 2.6%, P = 0.003). Multivariate regression revealed pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) and increased LCC calcification as independent predictors for PPI. Simulation of the TAVI procedure in a silicone annulus revealed an off-centreline shift of the valvuloplasty balloon and transcatheter heart valve away from the LCC towards the commissure between right- and non-coronary cusp.
CONCLUSION: Pre-existing RBBB and elevated LCC calcification were identified as independent predictors for PPI. These two risk factors enabled us to distinguish between patients according to their risk for PPI after TAVI. Ex vivo simulations suggested an off-centreline shift of the balloon as a possible explanation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2016. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; calcium distribution; pacemaker; simulation; transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26758411     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jev343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  27 in total

1.  Transvascular transcatheter aortic valve implantation in 2017.

Authors:  Luise Gaede; Johannes Blumenstein; Christoph Liebetrau; Oliver Dörr; Won-Keun Kim; Holger Nef; Oliver Husser; Jan Gülker; Albrecht Elsässer; Christian W Hamm; Stephan Achenbach; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Outcomes with a latest generation self-expandable, intra-annular, re-sheathable transcatheter heart valve system: analysis of patients with impaired left ventricular function and determinants for pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Andreas Schaefer; Niklas Neumann; Matthias Linder; Niklas Schofer; Yvonne Schneeberger; Florian Deuschl; Gerhard Schoen; Stefan Blankenberg; Hermann Reichenspurner; Lenard Conradi; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Three-dimensional printing of an aortic model for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: possible clinical applications.

Authors:  Marco Hernández-Enríquez; Salvatore Brugaletta; David Andreu; Glòria Macià-Muñoz; Mariona Castrejón-Subirá; Silvia Fernández-Suelves; Mar Hernández-Obiols; Ana Paula Dantas; Xavier Freixa; Victoria Martin-Yuste; Oscar Camara; Manel Sabaté
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  The Impact of Size and Position of a Mechanical Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve: Novel Insights Through Computational Modelling and Simulation.

Authors:  Giorgia Rocatello; Nahid El Faquir; Ole de Backer; Martin J Swaans; Azeem Latib; Luca Vicentini; Patrick Segers; Matthieu De Beule; Peter de Jaegere; Peter Mortier
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.

Authors:  Birgid Gonska; Julia Seeger; Mirjam Keßler; Alexander von Keil; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  The Role of Multimodality Imaging in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Qi Liu; Rebecca T Hahn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Predictors of paravalvular regurgitation and permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVR with a next-generation self-expanding device.

Authors:  Victor Mauri; Florian Deuschl; Thomas Frohn; Niklas Schofer; Matthias Linder; Elmar Kuhn; Andreas Schaefer; Volker Rudolph; Navid Madershahian; Lenard Conradi; Tanja K Rudolph; Ulrich Schäfer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 8.  Applications of 3D printing in cardiovascular diseases.

Authors:  Andreas A Giannopoulos; Dimitris Mitsouras; Shi-Joon Yoo; Peter P Liu; Yiannis S Chatzizisis; Frank J Rybicki
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  3D Printing Applications for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Dmitry Levin; G Burkhard Mackensen; Mark Reisman; James M McCabe; Danny Dvir; Beth Ripley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Should All Low-risk Patients Now Be Considered for TAVR? Operative Risk, Clinical, and Anatomic Considerations.

Authors:  Saima Siddique; Hemal Gada; Mubashir A Mumtaz; Amit N Vora
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.