Literature DB >> 26757867

[Follow-up of patients with good exercise capacity in stress test with myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)].

Javiera González, Hernán Prat, Eduardo Swett, Isabel Berrocal, René Fernández, Juan Pablo Zhindon, Ariel Castro, Teresa Massardo.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) can be performed with stress test and myocardial SPECT tomography. AIM: To assess the predictive value of myocardial SPECT using stress test for cardiovascular events in patients with good exercise capacity.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 102 males aged 56 ± 10 years and 19 females aged 52 ± 10 years, all able to achieve 10 METs and ≥ 85% of the theoretical maximum heart rate and at least 8 min in their stress test with gated 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT. Eighty two percent of patients were followed clinically for 33 ± 17 months.
RESULTS: Sixty seven percent of patients were studied for CAD screening and the rest for known disease assessment. Treadmill stress test was negative in 75.4%; 37% of patients with moderate to severe Duke Score presented ischemia. Normal myocardial perfusion SPECT was observed in 70.2%. Reversible defects appeared in 24.8% of cases, which were of moderate or severe degree (> 10% left ventricular extension) in 56.6%. Only seven cases had coronary events after the SPECT. Two major (myocardial infarction and emergency coronary revascularization) and 5 minor events (elective revascularization) ere observed in the follow-up. In a multivariate analysis, SPECT ischemia was the only statistically significant parameter that increased the probability of having a major or minor event.
CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a quarter of our patients with good exercise capacity demonstrated reversible defects in their myocardial perfusion SPECT. In the intermediate-term follow-up, a low rate of cardiac events was observed, being the isotopic ischemia the only significant predictive parameter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26757867     DOI: 10.4067/S0034-98872015001100008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Med Chil        ISSN: 0034-9887            Impact factor:   0.553


  1 in total

1.  Myocardial perfusion stress test: is it worth?

Authors:  Isidora Grozdic Milojevic; Marijana Tadic; Dragana Sobic-Saranovic; Bogomir Milojevic; Vera M Artiko
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.