| Literature DB >> 26757805 |
Ian Handel1, Kathryn A Watt2,3, Jill G Pilkington2, Josephine M Pemberton2, Alastair Macrae1, Philip Scott1, Tom N McNeilly4, Jacqueline L Berry5, Dylan N Clements1, Daniel H Nussey2,3, Richard J Mellanby1.
Abstract
Vitamin D deficiency has been associated with the development of many human diseases, and with poor reproductive performance in laboratory rodents. We currently have no idea how natural selection directly acts on variation in vitamin D metabolism due to a total lack of studies in wild animals. Here, we measured serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations in female Soay sheep that were part of a long-term field study on St Kilda. We found that total 25(OH)D was strongly influenced by age, and that light coloured sheep had higher 25(OH)D3 (but not 25(OH)D2) concentrations than dark sheep. The coat colour polymorphism in Soay sheep is controlled by a single locus, suggesting vitamin D status is heritable in this population. We also observed a very strong relationship between total 25(OH)D concentrations in summer and a ewe's fecundity the following spring. This resulted in a positive association between total 25(OH)D and the number of lambs produced that survived their first year of life, an important component of female reproductive fitness. Our study provides the first insight into naturally-occurring variation in vitamin D metabolites, and offers the first evidence that vitamin D status is both heritable and under natural selection in the wild.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26757805 PMCID: PMC4725927 DOI: 10.1038/srep18986
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Dark and light coated Soay sheep in the Village Bay area of St Kilda (photo credit Arpat Ozgul).
Figure 2Annual population size of Soay sheep population in August in Village Bay area on the island of Hirta, with year of sample collection in this study highlighted as a black diamond.
Figure 3Scatterplot showing relationship between 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3
Figure 4Association between age and serum concentrations of total 25(OH)D, 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3.
Individual results are shown as dots. Fitted general additive model shown as dotted line.
Figure 5Association between 25(OH)D concentration, age and coat colour.
Black points show mean with 95% confidence interval.
Results of regression models of 25(OH)D components including likelihood ratio test (LRT) p-values, estimates and standard error of estimate in brackets.
| Total 25(OH)D | 25(OH)D2 | 25(OH)D3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final model | Coat colour (light vs dark) | P = 0.014 9.744 (4.008) | – | P = 0.014 8.112 (3.323) |
| IgE | P = 0.022 38.848 (12.764) | P = 0.003 8.755 (2.964) | – | |
| IgG | P = 0.043 −18.679 (9.460) | – | ||
| Weight | – | P = 0.046 0.451 (0.229) | – | |
| Age Group (adult vs lamb) (geriatric vs lamb) | p < 0.001 36.706 (4.787) 25.937 (6.263) | p < 0.001 3.093 (2.592) -4.563 (3.518) | p < 0.001 29.250 (3.681) 27.002 (4.799) | |
| Dropped terms | Coat colour | – | P = 0.680 | – |
| IgE | – | — | P = 0.080 | |
| IgG | – | P = 0.227 | P = 0.792 | |
| Weight | P = 0.870 | – | P = 0.545 | |
| Addition of FEC to model using only Age Group | P = 0.123 | P = 0.224 | P = 0.161 |
LRT of addition of previous dropped terms and addition of faecal egg count to a model using only age group are shown in the lower sections.
Figure 6Association between fecundity (number of lambs born), Birthweight, Lamb survival to 4 months of age (conditional on birth) and Annual reproductive success and serum concentrations of total 25(OH)D, 25(OH)D2 and 25(OH)D3.
Points are randomly ‘jittered’ on the horizontal axis, to separate points, for all variables except for birth weight.
Results from regression models of fecundity, annual reproductive success, lamb birthweight and lamb over winter survival showing LRT p-values, estimates and (standard errors).
| Fecundity | Annual reproductive success | Birthweight | Lamb survival | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Final model | Age group | p = 0.008 Adult: 1.41 (0.56) Geri: 0.16 (0.72) | P < 0.001 Adult: 0.755 (0.152) | ||
| IgETc | p = 0.009 3.03 (1.19) | ||||
| Lamb sex | p = 0.016 Female: 0.187 (0.078) | ||||
| Twin | P < 0.001 Twin: −0.661 (0.080) | ||||
| Birthweight | p = 0.002 1.606 (0.571) | ||||
| Dropped terms | Age group | p = 0.073 | p = 0.936 | ||
| Weight | p = 0.122 | p = 0.091 | |||
| Coat colour | p = 0.287 | p = 0.797 | p = 0.875 | ||
| IgETc | - | p = 0.368 | |||
| IgGTc | p = 0.292 | p = 0.345 | |||
| Lamb sex | p = 0.423 | ||||
| Twin | p = 0.489 | ||||
| Addition of 25(OH)D | 25(OH)D2 | p = 0.007 0.106 (0.040) | p = 0.245 | p = 0.670 | p = 0.403 |
| 25(OH)D3 | P < 0.001 0.066 (0.017) | p = 0.033 0.026 (0.013) | p = 0.621 | p = 0.893 | |
| Total 25(OH)D | P < 0.001 0.058 (0.014) | p = 0.045 0.020 (0.010) | p = 0.570 | p = 0.880 |
Lower sections show dropped terms from models (LRT p-values) and effect of adding 25(OH)D components to models (LRT p-values). Fecundity, lamb survival and annual reproductive success estimates are log odds ratios. Birth weight estimates are linear model coefficients.