| Literature DB >> 26757744 |
Mingjie Lu1, Jun Li1, Zebo Huang1, Yiping Du1, Shidai Jin1, Jian Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the expression level of maspin mRNA in pulmonary adenocarcinoma and to clarify its clinical significance in prediction of prognosis. MATERIAL/Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26757744 PMCID: PMC4716712 DOI: 10.12659/msm.894995
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
The relationship between Maspin expression and clinicopathologic parameters.
| Characteristics | No. of patients | High expression | Low expression | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 0.527 | |||
| ≤60 | 74 | 39 (52.7%) | 35 (47.3%) | |
| >60 | 37 | 20 (54.1%) | 17 (45.9%) | |
| Gender | 0.512 | |||
| Male | 50 | 27 (54.0%) | 23 (46.0%) | |
| Female | 61 | 32 (52.5%) | 29 (47.5%) | |
| Tumor size (cm) | 0.106 | |||
| ≤3 | 76 | 45 (59.2%) | 31 (40.8%) | |
| >3 | 35 | 21 (60.0%) | 14 (40.0%) | |
| T stage | 0.179 | |||
| I | 49 | 29 (59.2%) | 20 (11.8%) | |
| II | 52 | 26 (50.0%) | 26 (42.3%) | |
| III | 6 | 1 (16.7%) | 5 (16.7%) | |
| IV | 4 | 3 (75.0%) | 1 (25.0%) | |
| N stage | 0.045 | |||
| N0 | 60 | 36 (60.0%) | 24 (40.0%) | |
| N1 | 17 | 9 (52.9%) | 8 (47.1%) | |
| N2 | 33 | 14 (42.4%) | 19 (57.6%) | |
| N3 | 1 | 1 (100%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
| TNM stage | 0.309 | |||
| I | 52 | 31 (59.6%) | 21 (40.4%) | |
| II | 22 | 12 (54.5%) | 10 (45.5%) | |
| III | 37 | 16 (43.2%) | 21 (56.8%) |
P<0.05.
Figure 1Detection of relative maspin mRNA expression in human AC tissues. (A) qRT-PCR was performed to detect the relative maspin expression in 30 pairs of AC tissues (AC) and corresponding noncancerous lung tissues (ANT). The mean expression level of maspin in AC tissues was significantly higher than that in ANT (P<0.001) (B). High maspin expression levels were observed in AC tissues in 20 (66.7%) cases. GAPDH was used as an internal control.
Figure 2High levels of maspin mRNA are correlated with progression in AC. (A) AC patients with lymphatic metastasis displayed significantly higher maspin expression levels (P=0.034). (B) AC patients with advanced TNM stage (III) displayed significantly higher maspin expression levels (P=0.038).
Figure 3Prognostic value of maspin mRNA in AC patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis shows that the DFS rates in the maspin low-expression group (n=59) were significantly higher than those of patients in the maspin high-expression group (n=52) (P=0.007).
Univariate and multivariate analysis of different prognostic factors for disease-free survival in 111 patients with AC.
| Prognostic factors | HR | 95% CI | HR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (≤60/>60) | 0.995 | 0.959–1.034 | 0.814 | |||
| Gender (male/female) | 1.010 | 0.221–1.476 | 0.489 | |||
| Smoking status (yes/no) | 1.211 | 0.936–1.933 | 0.673 | |||
| Tumor size (≤3 cm/>3 cm) | 0.489 | 0.284–0.844 | 0.010 | |||
| T stage | 2.110 | 1.537–2.898 | 0.000 | 1.602 | 1.148–2.234 | 0.006 |
| N stage | 1.839 | 1.379–2.453 | 0.000 | |||
| TNM stage (I–II/III) | 2.096 | 1.535–2.862 | 0.000 | 1.836 | 1.312–2.570 | 0.000 |
| Maspin (low/high) | 1.391 | 1.094–1.768 | 0.007 | 1.563 | 1.325–1.975 | 0.040 |
HR – hazard ratio; CI – confidence interval.
P<0.05.