Literature DB >> 26757047

The ecological and evolutionary stability of interspecific territoriality.

Neil Losin1, Jonathan P Drury1, Kathryn S Peiman1, Chaya Storch1, Gregory F Grether1.   

Abstract

Interspecific territoriality may play an important role in structuring ecological communities, but the causes of this widespread form of interference competition remain poorly understood. Here, we investigate the phenotypic, ecological and phylogenetic correlates of interspecific territoriality in wood warblers (Parulidae). Interspecifically territorial species have more recent common ancestors and are more similar phenotypically, and are more likely to hybridise, than sympatric, non-interspecifically territorial species. After phylogenetic corrections, however, similarity in plumage and territorial song are the only significant predictors of interspecific territoriality besides syntopy (fine-scale geographic overlap). Our results do not support the long-standing hypothesis that interspecific territoriality occurs only under circumstances in which niche divergence is restricted, which combined with the high incidence of interspecific territoriality in wood warblers (39% of species), suggests that this interspecific interaction is more stable, ecologically and evolutionarily, than commonly assumed.
© 2016 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  Birds; Parulidae; character displacement; competitor recognition; convergence; interference competition; niche conservatism; phylogenetic; species recognition; syntopy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26757047     DOI: 10.1111/ele.12561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  8 in total

Review 1.  Interspecific visual signalling in animals and plants: a functional classification.

Authors:  Tim Caro; William L Allen
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Competition and hybridization drive interspecific territoriality in birds.

Authors:  Jonathan P Drury; Madeline C Cowen; Gregory F Grether
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The outcomes of most aggressive interactions among closely related bird species are asymmetric.

Authors:  Paul R Martin; Cameron Freshwater; Cameron K Ghalambor
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Species partitioning in a temperate mountain chain: Segregation by habitat vs. interspecific competition.

Authors:  Giulia Bastianelli; Brendan A Wintle; Elizabeth H Martin; Javier Seoane; Paola Laiolo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-03-19       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Song playbacks demonstrate slower evolution of song discrimination in birds from Amazonia than from temperate North America.

Authors:  Jason T Weir; Trevor D Price
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Convergent morphology and divergent phenology promote the coexistence of Morpho butterfly species.

Authors:  Vincent Debat; Violaine Llaurens; Camille Le Roy; Camille Roux; Elisabeth Authier; Hugues Parrinello; Héloïse Bastide
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Contrasting impacts of competition on ecological and social trait evolution in songbirds.

Authors:  Jonathan P Drury; Joseph A Tobias; Kevin J Burns; Nicholas A Mason; Allison J Shultz; Hélène Morlon
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Home range size, vegetation density, and season influences prey use by coyotes (Canis latrans).

Authors:  Jennifer N Ward; Joseph W Hinton; Kristina L Johannsen; Melissa L Karlin; Karl V Miller; Michael J Chamberlain
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.