Literature DB >> 26756770

Rating the Raters: The Inconsistent Quality of Health Care Performance Measurement.

David M Shahian1, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Mark W Friedberg, Matthew M Hutter, Peter J Pronovost.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2016        PMID： 26756770     DOI： 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN： 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

1.  Commercial quality "awards" are not a strong indicator of quality surgical care.

Authors:  Adrienne N Cobb; Taylor R Erickson; Anai N Kothari; Emanuel Eguia; Sarah A Brownlee; Weiwei Yao; Hyunyou Choi; Victoria Greenberg; Joy Mboya; Michael Voss; Daniela Stan Raicu; Raffaella Settimi-Woods; Paul C Kuo
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 2.  Pelvic circumferential compression devices for prehospital management of suspected pelvic fractures: a rapid review and evidence summary for quality indicator evaluation.

Authors:  Robin Pap; Rachel McKeown; Craig Lockwood; Matthew Stephenson; Paul Simpson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  U.S. hospital performance methodologies: a scoping review to identify opportunities for crossing the quality chasm.

Authors:  Kelly J Thomas Craig; Mollie M McKillop; Hu T Huang; Judy George; Ekta S Punwani; Kyu B Rhee
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 4.  Steering by their own lights: Why regulators across Europe use different indicators to measure healthcare quality.

Authors:  Anne-Laure Beaussier; David Demeritt; Alex Griffiths; Henry Rothstein
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 2.980
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.