Literature DB >> 26756755

Columnar Metaplasia in the Esophageal Remnant After Esophagectomy: A Common Occurrence and a Valuable Insight Into the Development of Barrett Esophagus.

Lorna J Dunn1, Alastair D Burt, Nicholas Hayes, S Michael Griffin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to establish the incidence of postesophagectomy columnar metaplasia and dysplasia, and the timescale over which it develops. It also aimed to assess if this epithelium is molecularly similar to sporadic Barrett esophagus, thereby confirming suitability as a research model.
BACKGROUND: Metaplasia in the esophageal remnant after esophagectomy is well described, but incidence and the potential for dysplasia are uncertain, and the clinical relevance unclear. Although proposed as a model for Barrett esophagus, no large studies have examined the molecular phenotype of postesophagectomy metaplasia.
METHODS: Patients underwent prospective endoscopic evaluation having previously undergone esophagectomy. The macroscopic appearance of the esophageal remnant was noted and biopsies taken. Specimens were stained using hematoxylin and eosin and by immunohistochemistry for cytokeratins 7 and 20, and Chromogranin A-proteins which have a well described expression pattern in sporadic Barrett esophagus.
RESULTS: Of the 126 eligible patients, 45 (36%) had evidence of metaplasia. There were no cases of dysplasia. Nonintestinalized columnar epithelium occurred earlier than specialized intestinal metaplasia (median 4.8 vs 8.1 yr; P = 0.025). Thirty-seven samples underwent immunohistochemical analysis. A classic cytokeratin 7/20 staining pattern was present in 23 cases (62%), within the prevalence range reported for sporadic Barrett.
CONCLUSIONS: Columnar metaplasia is common following esophagectomy, but the absence of dysplasia in this large cohort is reassuring. Presence of specialized intestinal metaplasia is associated with increased time from surgery, suggesting this represents later disease. Immunohistochemistry staining is similar to sporadic Barrett, suggesting that this group of patients represent an accurate human model for the development of Barrett.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26756755     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001591

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac Metaplasia: Follow, Treat, or Ignore?

Authors:  Stuart J Spechler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Pathogenesis and Cells of Origin of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Jianwen Que; Katherine S Garman; Rhonda F Souza; Stuart Jon Spechler
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  Mechanisms and pathophysiology of Barrett oesophagus.

Authors:  Rhonda F Souza; Stuart J Spechler
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 73.082

4.  Early identification of esophageal squamous neoplasm by hyperspectral endoscopic imaging.

Authors:  I-Chen Wu; Hao-Yi Syu; Chun-Ping Jen; Ming-Yen Lu; Yi-Ting Chen; Ming-Tsang Wu; Chie-Tong Kuo; Yu-Yuan Tsai; Hsiang-Chen Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Histologic Study of the Esophagogastric Junction of Organ Donors Reveals Novel Glandular Structures in Normal Esophageal and Gastric Mucosae.

Authors:  Robert Odze; Stuart J Spechler; Eitan Podgaetz; Anh Nguyen; Vani Konda; Rhonda F Souza
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.396

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.